humanist wrote:it is still their ancestral homes and perhaps that is the difference between family oriented societies and capitalist careless ones
GorillaGal wrote:humanist wrote:it is still their ancestral homes and perhaps that is the difference between family oriented societies and capitalist careless ones
ok, that i do not understand at all.
and i think you are referring to myself/my culture as the capitalistic one? if a house burns down you can't rebuilt it to the exact. life happens. go with the flow. would it not be disrespectful to walk away from the last 35 years? wouldn't that be the capitalistic attitude? -- "i want it all, i want the past and i want the future, i want it all."???
The Cypriot wrote:I don't understand how someone who has the Statue of Liberty as their avatar can be encouraging Cypriots to give up on the right to decide what is done to land they legally own; give up on their freedom to return and reclaim it if they so wish.
When Martin Luther King had a dream in the 60's he got shot. Should members of the Civil Rights Movement have gone with the flow? Accepted the situation? After all, life (and death) happens. It was a long time ago. Or should they have continued the struggle against segregation and injustice? Until, decades later, a man of colour could be elected as president; and take up residence in a White House previously only ever occupied by white incumbents.
Piratis wrote:GorillaGal wrote:humanist wrote:it is still their ancestral homes and perhaps that is the difference between family oriented societies and capitalist careless ones
ok, that i do not understand at all.
and i think you are referring to myself/my culture as the capitalistic one? if a house burns down you can't rebuilt it to the exact. life happens. go with the flow. would it not be disrespectful to walk away from the last 35 years? wouldn't that be the capitalistic attitude? -- "i want it all, i want the past and i want the future, i want it all."???
We want nothing more than what is ours. The greedy ones are those who invade foreign countries in order to exploit them. Like the Turks with their invasion of Cyprus, or the Americans with their invasion of Iraq (for the oil).
34 years is absolutely nothing compared to the 1000s of years we have been on this island. Many foreign invaders came, but nobody managed to take Cyprus permanently from its native people.
GorillaGal wrote:Piratis wrote:GorillaGal wrote:humanist wrote:it is still their ancestral homes and perhaps that is the difference between family oriented societies and capitalist careless ones
ok, that i do not understand at all.
and i think you are referring to myself/my culture as the capitalistic one? if a house burns down you can't rebuilt it to the exact. life happens. go with the flow. would it not be disrespectful to walk away from the last 35 years? wouldn't that be the capitalistic attitude? -- "i want it all, i want the past and i want the future, i want it all."???
We want nothing more than what is ours. The greedy ones are those who invade foreign countries in order to exploit them. Like the Turks with their invasion of Cyprus, or the Americans with their invasion of Iraq (for the oil).
34 years is absolutely nothing compared to the 1000s of years we have been on this island. Many foreign invaders came, but nobody managed to take Cyprus permanently from its native people.
who are those "native people"?
are they greeks?
are they turks?
are they cypriots?
denizaksulu wrote:Hi Gorilla Gal; nice to have you back in full force.
Piratis'' last statement is best ignored as it has no relevance to todays issues. First settlers the Greeks indeed. He never gives up. Next he will be claiming all Greeks are derived from Cyprus.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests