The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Dayanc Case -dayanc Davasi

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Dayanc Case -dayanc Davasi

Postby halil » Sun May 31, 2009 5:29 pm

Turkish Cypriot Lawer Dayanç opened a case about his property in Tahtakale .
According to daily Turkish Cypriot paper Mr. Dayanç claming back his home from the Greek Cypriot minister of education .

For using his property he is claming 2 Million euros compensation .

In daily kıbris paper he is showing his kochans and also picture of his home which is converted into a school since 1963. He wants compensation for his property and return back his property very soon .He has applied many times to minister of education he did not get any positive answer from the minister office . He says at Orams case İndividual is occupying the the property but here state is occupying my property since 1963 .He says he and his family were left the Tahtakale in 1963 . Also he says they have a properties in various part of the South Cyprus also shops in Ermu Street too . For a moment he is claming only from the State who is occuping his home . He says in North his family does not occupy any GC properties in North.

In one part of his saying he also says his father Fethi Ata has gone to see they are homes in 1967 when the Lokmaci gate was opened to civilians at that time and he was claim back rent from the ROC that time .He might get his rent from 1967-1972 but he is not sure about . In 2003 when the boarders opened solicitor Dayanç has seen his home and In 2005 he got certificates for they are place from larnaka land registery office . since than he is strugling to get back his home and compensation from the ROC .
halil
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8804
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: nicosia

Postby YFred » Sun May 31, 2009 5:47 pm

There is one slight difference Halil. Mr Dayanç is a TC so according to RoC policy he must wait until after the agreement. If he was a GC now that is another matter.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby halil » Sun May 31, 2009 5:55 pm

YFred wrote:There is one slight difference Halil. Mr Dayanç is a TC so according to RoC policy he must wait until after the agreement. If he was a GC now that is another matter.


Thats why he applied to ECHR now .

read rest of the story from Kıbrıs web online version of it :
Dayanç davası!

http://www.kibrisgazetesi.com/
halil
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8804
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: nicosia

Postby zan » Sun May 31, 2009 6:19 pm

Thats one 8) 8) 8) 8)
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby Jerry » Sun May 31, 2009 6:32 pm

Bloody thickos you lot!

Can't you see the difference between the ROC using TC property because there is a relative shortage of it in the south and the "trnc nice little earner" of flogging off "surplus" Greek Cypriot land to thieving Brits and others.
Jerry
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: UK

Postby axilleask » Sun May 31, 2009 6:32 pm

The answer is pretty simple!
And that applies to all Tc's. If you want your property back, come and stay in the areas controlled by the legitimate goverment of this island. Plain and simple.
Everything else is a pile of crap.
axilleask
Member
Member
 
Posts: 141
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:59 pm

Postby YFred » Sun May 31, 2009 6:47 pm

Jerry wrote:Bloody thickos you lot!

Can't you see the difference between the ROC using TC property because there is a relative shortage of it in the south and the "trnc nice little earner" of flogging off "surplus" Greek Cypriot land to thieving Brits and others.

Oh well that’s all right then. W e understand. Of course you can use TC lands and trade with the rest of the world legally. Don't think that we are not grateful for being allowed to breathe. You are Greek after all aren't you old boy?
Thought so, recognised the accent and the arrogance that comes with it
.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby Oracle » Sun May 31, 2009 6:57 pm

This is mindless waste of time to raise false hope ... and maybe some business for the 'lawyer'.

The RoC has a procedure in place whereby if any TCs wanted their property back, they only have to come across the buffer zone and apply, presumably so that validity checks can be carried out to avoid giving it to the wrong person ... something the "trnc" cares little about.

Contrast that with any GC returning, to even pick a flower from their rightful home, and see what would happen!
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby DT. » Sun May 31, 2009 6:58 pm

There's a very simple solution to all this and a defense the govt uses. End the occupation by Turkey, give back people their homes and all can be restored.
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby Jerry » Sun May 31, 2009 7:27 pm

YFred wrote:
Jerry wrote:Bloody thickos you lot!

Can't you see the difference between the ROC using TC property because there is a relative shortage of it in the south and the "trnc nice little earner" of flogging off "surplus" Greek Cypriot land to thieving Brits and others.

Oh well that’s all right then. W e understand. Of course you can use TC lands and trade with the rest of the world legally. Don't think that we are not grateful for being allowed to breathe. You are Greek after all aren't you old boy?
Thought so, recognised the accent and the arrogance that comes with it


.


Sometimes Fred, you talk like a real prat. I considered you to be a more sensible "northener". To respond to your puerile post in the order it was posted:-

We use TC land, you use GC land. That's fine as a temporary measure (35 years?) and ultimately subject to compensation or restitution but we do not make a business of "selling off" your land to outsiders.

We trade with the rest of the world because the world realises that someone has to be recognised as the legal State in Cyprus and it's only right that the 80% majority qualify not the minority. Your crummy little "state" was created by illegally armed force and is supported only by the invader.

We would be very grateful if we could breathe freely in Famagusta - why won't you let us?

Arrogance? What a bloody cheek - ethnic cleansing, illegal settlement of mainlanders, flags on mountains, defying UN resolutions, defying the EU, shooting unarmed protesters in front of the world's media, etc etc.

You have a military and territorial advantage on the island we have the legal, economic and moral advantage. Something has got to give and soon. I have a feeling that economics are going to force genuine concessions from Turkey, probably this year.
Jerry
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: UK

Next

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests