halil wrote:For using his property he is claming 2 Million euros compensation .
DT. wrote:There's a very simple solution to all this and a defense the govt uses. End the occupation by Turkey, give back people their homes and all can be restored.
Viewpoint wrote:DT. wrote:There's a very simple solution to all this and a defense the govt uses. End the occupation by Turkey, give back people their homes and all can be restored.
How naive do you think you can vacate all TCs land that easily? How about the refugees homes in Limasol on TC land, are you gonna throw all these people out?
wallace wrote:Viewpoint wrote:DT. wrote:There's a very simple solution to all this and a defense the govt uses. End the occupation by Turkey, give back people their homes and all can be restored.
How naive do you think you can vacate all TCs land that easily? How about the refugees homes in Limasol on TC land, are you gonna throw all these people out?
No....they will go back home if their houses and land isn't sold of that is and when the Turkish army fucks off from Cyprus.
bill cobbett wrote:If we believe in and support the property rights of this tissy, this chap's land is his. His to enjoy and do with as he likes in much the same way that Mr A should be able to do with his land in Lapithos.
This six month residency rule (although I can see the reasons for it) probably won't wash if it's tested at the ECHR cos, as it stands, it discriminates on ethnic grounds.
Regretfully, I have to say the gov of the Republic has to review it or face a PR setback on it's record.
Oracle wrote:bill cobbett wrote:If we believe in and support the property rights of this tissy, this chap's land is his. His to enjoy and do with as he likes in much the same way that Mr A should be able to do with his land in Lapithos.
This six month residency rule (although I can see the reasons for it) probably won't wash if it's tested at the ECHR cos, as it stands, it discriminates on ethnic grounds.
Regretfully, I have to say the gov of the Republic has to review it or face a PR setback on it's record.
It depends on the reasons for the six month rule. If it's to determine the validity of contesting the property, it's an administrative problem which is not discriminatory. The EU will understand how long such things take to prove.
The reality is that GCs have been arrested for even picking flowers from their own property! However, the RoC has set in motion legitimate ways of TCs returning ... even though the "abandonments" by TCs were not of the RoC's volition, but a consequence of the Turkish invasion/walkout .... something the RoC had no administrative jurisdiction over.
YFred wrote:Oracle wrote:bill cobbett wrote:If we believe in and support the property rights of this tissy, this chap's land is his. His to enjoy and do with as he likes in much the same way that Mr A should be able to do with his land in Lapithos.
This six month residency rule (although I can see the reasons for it) probably won't wash if it's tested at the ECHR cos, as it stands, it discriminates on ethnic grounds.
Regretfully, I have to say the gov of the Republic has to review it or face a PR setback on it's record.
It depends on the reasons for the six month rule. If it's to determine the validity of contesting the property, it's an administrative problem which is not discriminatory. The EU will understand how long such things take to prove.
The reality is that GCs have been arrested for even picking flowers from their own property! However, the RoC has set in motion legitimate ways of TCs returning ... even though the "abandonments" by TCs were not of the RoC's volition, but a consequence of the Turkish invasion/walkout .... something the RoC had no administrative jurisdiction over.
So why have they taken 3 years and still not confirmed Deniz's Kochans and give his land back. He is an EU citizen, left Cyprus in 64 so the 6 month rule should not even apply to him.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest