The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


GC "Man with a mission" persecuted by GC

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Viewpoint » Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:02 pm

Kifeas
Who is this person Bananiot?


Mr Papadop
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby Kifeas » Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:15 pm

Viewpoint wrote:Kifeas
Who is this person Bananiot?


Mr Papadop


Viewpoint, I am asking who is the sucker that Bananiot is reffering to.

I prefer a reply from Bananiot himslef and not from his solicitor.
User avatar
Kifeas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4927
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Lapithos, Kyrenia, now Pafos; Cyprus.

Postby Bananiot » Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:19 pm

What about from the devil's advocate Kifeas. How come you are unable to understand who the sucker is kifeas? Read the thread more carefully, it's not difficult. I think you should concentrate on Defkalion, for the sake of historical truth.
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Postby Viewpoint » Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:29 pm

Kifeas
I prefer a reply from Bananiot himslef and not from his solicitor.


OK

and by the way im not a solicitor :lol:
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby Kifeas » Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:31 pm

Bananiot wrote:What about from the devil's advocate Kifeas. How come you are unable to understand who the sucker is kifeas? Read the thread more carefully, it's not difficult. I think you should concentrate on Defkalion, for the sake of historical truth.


Bananiot,
In your previous posting you were addressing me and /or Micatcyp. At the end, you called either both or one of the two, a sucker. I assume from your above posting that it is me you had in mind. Is that correct?
User avatar
Kifeas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4927
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Lapithos, Kyrenia, now Pafos; Cyprus.

Postby garbitsch » Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:33 pm

Viewpoint wrote:Kifeas
I prefer a reply from Bananiot himslef and not from his solicitor.


OK

and by the way im not a solicitor :lol:


If you have an opposite view, you are a sucker. If you share the same views with a sucker, then you are a solicitor. Still couldn't get this simple logic VP? :wink:
User avatar
garbitsch
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1158
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 2:21 am
Location: UK, but originally from Cyprus

Postby Bananiot » Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:37 pm

It is clear, but I will spell it out. I was referring to the one that thought I was swearing at. The one who suddenly discovered the high grounds of morality after he just about insulted everyone in this forum. The one that claims that I massacred innocent people. Was that so difficult to deduce? Yet you had no problem, Kifeas, in working out my party affiliations.
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Postby demetriou_74 » Mon Jun 20, 2005 9:01 pm

Ban your signature is ''thank god the greeks voted NO'' as a quote from denktash why is this a good thing? votign YES would of given the turks a sweet deal
User avatar
demetriou_74
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1615
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 7:06 pm
Location: London, Greek Cypriot

Postby Viewpoint » Mon Jun 20, 2005 9:06 pm

demetriou_74
as a quote from denktash why is this a good thing?


you made Denktas a very happy man, you gave him the biggest present ever a divided Cyprus, he said you guys would say no and then told us this is the GCs you want to unite and live with, they will never accept to share anything with us let alone a united Cyprus, dont fool yourselves.
Last edited by Viewpoint on Mon Jun 20, 2005 9:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby demetriou_74 » Mon Jun 20, 2005 9:08 pm

the reason why Cyprus voted No was because it would of meant that they pay themselves compensation and in most cases not get their homes back.
User avatar
demetriou_74
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1615
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 7:06 pm
Location: London, Greek Cypriot

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests