The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


A MATTER OF PRINCIPLE.

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Viewpoint » Mon May 25, 2009 8:27 pm

So would it be OK with everyone if I put as my signature "a good GC is a raped one"? how would GCs feel about this?
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby polis » Mon May 25, 2009 8:59 pm

As long as the Turkish Army continues to occupy Cyprus, the only good Turk is a dead Turk.
Last edited by polis on Mon May 25, 2009 9:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
polis
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 390
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:44 pm
Location: Cyprus

Postby Oracle » Mon May 25, 2009 9:01 pm

Viewpoint wrote:So would it be OK with everyone if I put as my signature "a good GC is a raped one"? how would GCs feel about this?


It's no worse than what you usually say in every one of your posts ...

So go ahead ... you know you want to!

Sick prick!
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Get Real! » Mon May 25, 2009 9:06 pm

Viewpoint wrote:So would it be OK with everyone if I put as my signature "a good GC is a raped one"? how would GCs feel about this?

Then I would modify mine from Turk to TC... :lol:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Talisker » Mon May 25, 2009 9:08 pm

Viewpoint wrote:So would it be OK with everyone if I put as my signature "a good GC is a raped one"? how would GCs feel about this?

It would only reflect (extremely) badly on you. As your post has just done. Idiot.
User avatar
Talisker
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1029
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:41 pm
Location: UK

Postby miltiades » Mon May 25, 2009 9:14 pm

Oracle wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:So would it be OK with everyone if I put as my signature "a good GC is a raped one"? how would GCs feel about this?


It's no worse than what you usually say in every one of your posts ...

So go ahead ... you know you want to!

Sick prick!

I do not see eye to eye with VP on a myriad of issues concerning the Cyprob but I will say one thing for VP and that is he would never stoop so low as to use such vulgar signatures. I would also say that despite my disagreements on the way forward he has never been rude to me , on the contrary he has been mostly polite.
An old woman tells me to F..Off , this same old woman presents herself as a learned scientist , she tells me to F..OFF because I have challenged , as I always do , inflammatory hateful and vulgar sentiments which she happens to share , now she has the audacity to admonish VP!!
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Postby polis » Mon May 25, 2009 9:17 pm

Here's an interesting one from http://www.trivia-library.com/b/origins-of-sayings-the-only-good-indian-is-a-dead-indian.htm:

Origins of Sayings - The Only Good Indian is a Dead Indian
Abuot the history and origins behind the famous saying the only good indian is a dead indian.

Stories behind Famous Sayings

The Saying: THE ONLY GOOD INDIAN IS A DEAD INDIAN.

Who Said It: Gen. Philip Sheridan

When: 1869

The Story behind It: In January, 1869, General Sheridan held a conference with 50 Indian chiefs at Fort Cobb in the so-called Indian Territory (later part of Oklahoma). At that time, Sheridan, who had gained recognition as a Union officer in the Civil War, was in charge of the Dept. of the Missouri. One of his duties was to oversee the Indian Territory, making sure that the Indians remained on their reservations and did not harass the white settlers. When Comanche chief Toch-a-way was introduced to Sheridan at the conference, the Indian said, "Me Toch-a-way, me good Indian." Sheridan reportedly smirked and replied, "The only good Indians I ever saw were dead." Later on, the remark became "The only good Indian is a dead Indian."

© 1975 - 1981 by David Wallechinsky & Irving Wallace
Reproduced with permission from "The People's Almanac" series of books.
All rights reserved.
polis
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 390
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:44 pm
Location: Cyprus

Postby Oracle » Mon May 25, 2009 9:26 pm

miltiades wrote:
Oracle wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:So would it be OK with everyone if I put as my signature "a good GC is a raped one"? how would GCs feel about this?


It's no worse than what you usually say in every one of your posts ...

So go ahead ... you know you want to!

Sick prick!

I do not see eye to eye with VP on a myriad of issues concerning the Cyprob but I will say one thing for VP and that is he would never stoop so low as to use such vulgar signatures. I would also say that despite my disagreements on the way forward he has never been rude to me , on the contrary he has been mostly polite.


VP would never disagree with you because you do the Turks propaganda for them.

If you think VP has not stooped so low, you have missed a great number of his posts ... quite a few deleted by morning time if I may add.


An old woman tells me to F..Off , this same old woman presents herself as a learned scientist , she tells me to F..OFF because I have challenged , as I always do , inflammatory hateful and vulgar sentiments which she happens to share , now she has the audacity to admonish VP!!


I do not present myself as anything ... if others have posted I was a scientist, they are way behind the times. I have moved on and on and on!

You told me not to use fancy words ... so I offered you vernacular ... and then you could not stomach it.

I admonished VP, as others have, because if you, dear turkophile, cannot see how his statement is worse than any others ... you are a fucking degraded son of a Turk!
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Viewpoint » Mon May 25, 2009 9:34 pm

miltiades wrote:
Oracle wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:So would it be OK with everyone if I put as my signature "a good GC is a raped one"? how would GCs feel about this?


It's no worse than what you usually say in every one of your posts ...

So go ahead ... you know you want to!

Sick prick!

I do not see eye to eye with VP on a myriad of issues concerning the Cyprob but I will say one thing for VP and that is he would never stoop so low as to use such vulgar signatures. I would also say that despite my disagreements on the way forward he has never been rude to me , on the contrary he has been mostly polite.
An old woman tells me to F..Off , this same old woman presents herself as a learned scientist , she tells me to F..OFF because I have challenged , as I always do , inflammatory hateful and vulgar sentiments which she happens to share , now she has the audacity to admonish VP!!


Thanks Miltiades I have a lotof respect for your opinions although they can be utopiand and very dangerous for us TCs. I was trying to make a point with the above post I think you have understood what I was trying to get at.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby humanist » Mon May 25, 2009 9:37 pm

I am with Miltiades on this one. I found the signature offensive also and chose not to participate in telling someone what their signature should read. However as I find some of the TC and Turk comments offensive, I feel I have the right to say that the signature is offensive to some users.

Despite the fact that the TC's choose to violate our human rights along with Turkey not all TC's and I am sure the everyday Turk here and there are good people also.
User avatar
humanist
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6585
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:46 am

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests