It has been reported from the occupied by Turkey areas of Cyprus that TC leader Talat has called upon the international community to prepare a solution proposal by the end of the year. It seems that Talat has gotten used and spoiled by the luxury of been served solution proposals in his favor -akin the Annan plan IV- that is why he is opting and counting on this possibility. Quite understandable I must say, however, what I do not understand is why the Greek Cypriot side and Christofias do not pick up on his desire for an imported solution, and declare that we are also ready to welcome, put to a referendum and support a solution proposal from the international community, provided that such a proposal is well placed within certain very legitimate parameters.
What are these parameters?
The settlement proposal should be within the UN framework, something which the Turkish side has so many times declared that it also accepts. What this UN framework entails, of course, is that the solution proposal should adhere to the UN resolutions on Cyprus, the UN Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and international law in general. Furthermore, the solution proposal should also take into consideration the fact that Cyprus is now a full member of the EU, and therefore its values, principles and laws should be observed.
The GC side should declare that if the international community’s settlement proposal falls within the above parameters, we are ready to endorse and accept it; should it not, we will not even bother to put it down to a referendum. What are we afraid of? I also believe that the above preconditions should have been set up in 2004, when Kofi Annan got us to accept giving him a blank check in doing his “arbitration,” prior to Annan plan VI.