miltiades wrote:Get Real! wrote:George Galloway is not the topic of this thread but his wise comments cannot be disputed…
“An election held under foreign military occupation is always, by definition, utterly flawed."
“The facts are that it is simply impossible to hold an election when there is a full-scale war going on between the occupying armies and the resistance forces.”
Galloway is just as wise as ....you !! A bloody fool !
What fucking resistance is he talking about mate , the fucking savages who blow themselves up in public places , on buses , at funeral processions , in mosques ? Get a life stupid !
Disregarding the fact that George Galloway made the statement which YOU find so foolish, are you advocating that a fair election CAN be conducted under the conditions described ?.
Bearing in mind of course, that the significant points outlined in the statement are, that the nation being either forced or cajoled into holding an election, is likely to be under severe duress precisely because of the military presence that created an atmosphere of civil unrest in the first place.
Kindly answer (or at least attempt to) the question without your usual tirade of abuse, it is most unbecoming for a man of your age that you are so prone to rely on such filthy language in order to press a point, also, it denotes utter ignorance that you should HAVE to when writing.
God only knows what base levels of filth your foul tongue is able to descend to in general conversation, I thought you mentioned that you are a Grandparent (God Help the Children).
