Cyprus-Forum.com

[Get Real!]

US actors, intellectuals protest Obama 'crimes'

US actors and liberal intellectuals joined a list to be published Friday of nearly 2,000 people accusing President Barack Obama of allowing human rights violations and war crimes.

"Crimes are crimes, no matter who does them," the statement reads over pictures of Obama and his predecessor George W. Bush due to appear in the New York Review of Books.

The statement, published as a paid advertisement, accuses Obama, who was elected in 2008 with the enthusiastic support of US liberals, of continuing Bush's controversial approach to human rights in Iraq and Afghanistan, and in domestic security.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id ... _article=1

[miltiades]

Another bunch of birdbrained" liberals " Al Qaeda supporters and all without exemption first class Plonkers , a bit like you mate !

[Lit]

Another bunch of birdbrained" liberals " Al Qaeda supporters and all without exemption first class Plonkers , a bit like you mate !

Well said, Milti.

[Get Real!]

Afghans believe US is funding Taliban

Intellectuals and respected Afghan professionals are convinced the west is prolonging conflict to maintain influence in the region

It's near-impossible to find anyone in Afghanistan who doesn't believe the US are funding the Taliban: and it's the highly educated Afghan professionals, those employed by ISAF, USAID, international media organisations – and even advising US diplomats – who seem the most convinced.

One Afghan friend, who speaks flawless English and likes to quote Charles Dickens, Bertolt Brecht and Anton Chekhov, says the reason is clear. "The US has an interest in prolonging the conflict so as to stay in Afghanistan for the long term."

The continuing violence between coalition forces and the Taliban is simple proof in itself.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... ments=true

[miltiades]

Afghans believe US is funding Taliban

Intellectuals and respected Afghan professionals are convinced the west is prolonging conflict to maintain influence in the region

It's near-impossible to find anyone in Afghanistan who doesn't believe the US are funding the Taliban: and it's the highly educated Afghan professionals, those employed by ISAF, USAID, international media organisations – and even advising US diplomats – who seem the most convinced.

One Afghan friend, who speaks flawless English and likes to quote Charles Dickens, Bertolt Brecht and Anton Chekhov, says the reason is clear. "The US has an interest in prolonging the conflict so as to stay in Afghanistan for the long term."

The continuing violence between coalition forces and the Taliban is simple proof in itself.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... ments=true

Never have I ever read such absolute shit , anyone that believes these rubbish is obviously mentally deranged so if you believe that you also believe this crap.
" His arguments are reasoned, although he slightly ruins the effect by explaining to me that no Jews died in the Twin Towers. "

[Lit]

Afghans believe US is funding Taliban

Oh, of course you silly conspiracist.

Here is another news flash for you. Your human rights will never be guaranteed without the help of the sole remaining superpower.

Despite what you think, Cherikidia can not liberate the occupied land on its own.

[Get Real!]

Afghans believe US is funding Taliban

Oh, of course you silly conspiracist.

Here is another news flash for you. Your human rights will never be guaranteed without the help of the sole remaining superpower.

Despite what you think, Cherikidia can not liberate the occupied land on its own.

So when have you arranged for that to take place? Taking awfully long…

[Get Real!]

Senate Approves Nearly $60 Billion for Wars

WASHINGTON — The Senate on Thursday approved a nearly $60 billion measure to pay for continuing military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq as House Democrats struggled to round up votes for a major package of business tax breaks and safety-net programs for the long-term unemployed.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/28/us/po ... ?ref=world

[Get Real!]

Int'l Court nations to ponder crimes of aggression

International Court states to discuss how to prosecute illegal attacks by one state on another

The 111 member nations of the International Criminal Court hope to finally agree on how to prosecute illegal attacks by one state on another when they meet next week in Uganda, the conference's leader said Thursday.

http://wire.antiwar.com/2010/05/27/intl ... ggression/

[Get Real!]

Is there still anyone out there who wonders who the arch-terrorist is?


U.S. blocks Security Council criticism of Israeli raid

Israel faced heavy criticism in an emergency session of the United Nations Security Council on Monday in response to its deadly attack on an aid flotilla trying to breach the Gaza blockade, but attempts to issue a formal statement stalled after the United States rejected the strong condemnation sought by Turkey.

http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_15200395