The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Varosa built on Evkaf land

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Viewpoint » Sun May 24, 2009 11:23 pm

Kifeas wrote:
YFred wrote:
halil wrote:Again, as one would expect, the Turkish Cypriot estimates of Turkish Cypriot-owned land on either side of the island are much higher than the Greek Cypriot estimates: 33.1% of privately owned land in the north, and 22.8% of privately owned land in the south (corresponding Greek Cypriot figures are 21.1% and 13.9%, respectively). What is more important is the percentage of Greek Cypriot private property in the north. The Turkish Cypriot side estimates this at 1,228,838 donums, which is equivalent to 63.8% of all privately owned land in the north. Although significantly lower than the corresponding Greek Cypriot estimate (1,463,382 donums or 78.5%), this is still a remarkably high percentage.


God knows what will happen at the table :!: :?: :idea:

Mr X will have to invite a pole dancer to distract Talat from these figures.


It is not up to what the TC side or Talat say, but what the international community accept, which is basically what the RoC land registry records say. The RoC land registry records are always open to inspection for anyone wishing to see each property's history records. Nevertheless, this is also what the CoE and the ECtHRs accept in all the property cases of Cyprus.


International experts can solve this once and for all taking into account all documenttion and the decision will have to be accepted by both sides.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby Kifeas » Sun May 24, 2009 11:28 pm

YFred wrote:
halil wrote:
YFred wrote:
halil wrote:Again, as one would expect, the Turkish Cypriot estimates of Turkish Cypriot-owned land on either side of the island are much higher than the Greek Cypriot estimates: 33.1% of privately owned land in the north, and 22.8% of privately owned land in the south (corresponding Greek Cypriot figures are 21.1% and 13.9%, respectively). What is more important is the percentage of Greek Cypriot private property in the north. The Turkish Cypriot side estimates this at 1,228,838 donums, which is equivalent to 63.8% of all privately owned land in the north. Although significantly lower than the corresponding Greek Cypriot estimate (1,463,382 donums or 78.5%), this is still a remarkably high percentage.


God knows what will happen at the table :!: :?: :idea:

Mr X will have to invite a pole dancer to distract Talat from these figures.


old Cypriots habit Bargaining (Pazarlık ,bazarliki ) not popular in these days ....... :!: :?: :idea:

It's not just the actual areas but complicated by the land price differences between the north and the south.


And what is this supposed to mean? That because the north was illegally occupied by Turkey and thus remained outside the legal property market framework, the GC properties in the north should be devaluated and the TC properties in the south should remain appreciated? Does your mother have more cleverish sons like yourself, or are you just her only one?
User avatar
Kifeas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4927
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Lapithos, Kyrenia, now Pafos; Cyprus.

Postby Viewpoint » Sun May 24, 2009 11:35 pm

Kifeas wrote:
YFred wrote:
halil wrote:
YFred wrote:
halil wrote:Again, as one would expect, the Turkish Cypriot estimates of Turkish Cypriot-owned land on either side of the island are much higher than the Greek Cypriot estimates: 33.1% of privately owned land in the north, and 22.8% of privately owned land in the south (corresponding Greek Cypriot figures are 21.1% and 13.9%, respectively). What is more important is the percentage of Greek Cypriot private property in the north. The Turkish Cypriot side estimates this at 1,228,838 donums, which is equivalent to 63.8% of all privately owned land in the north. Although significantly lower than the corresponding Greek Cypriot estimate (1,463,382 donums or 78.5%), this is still a remarkably high percentage.


God knows what will happen at the table :!: :?: :idea:

Mr X will have to invite a pole dancer to distract Talat from these figures.


old Cypriots habit Bargaining (Pazarlık ,bazarliki ) not popular in these days ....... :!: :?: :idea:

It's not just the actual areas but complicated by the land price differences between the north and the south.


And what is this supposed to mean? That because the north was illegally occupied by Turkey and thus remained outside the legal property market framework, the GC properties in the north should be devaluated and the TC properties in the south should remain appreciated? Does your mother have more cleverish sons like yourself, or are you just her only one?


refugees on both sides should get full market value for their property including land taken by the "RoC" or alternatively a choice of land in the south or north.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby halil » Mon May 25, 2009 7:58 am

Viewpoint wrote:
Kifeas wrote:
YFred wrote:
halil wrote:Again, as one would expect, the Turkish Cypriot estimates of Turkish Cypriot-owned land on either side of the island are much higher than the Greek Cypriot estimates: 33.1% of privately owned land in the north, and 22.8% of privately owned land in the south (corresponding Greek Cypriot figures are 21.1% and 13.9%, respectively). What is more important is the percentage of Greek Cypriot private property in the north. The Turkish Cypriot side estimates this at 1,228,838 donums, which is equivalent to 63.8% of all privately owned land in the north. Although significantly lower than the corresponding Greek Cypriot estimate (1,463,382 donums or 78.5%), this is still a remarkably high percentage.


God knows what will happen at the table :!: :?: :idea:

Mr X will have to invite a pole dancer to distract Talat from these figures.


It is not up to what the TC side or Talat say, but what the international community accept, which is basically what the RoC land registry records say. The RoC land registry records are always open to inspection for anyone wishing to see each property's history records. Nevertheless, this is also what the CoE and the ECtHRs accept in all the property cases of Cyprus.


International experts can solve this once and for all taking into account all documenttion and the decision will have to be accepted by both sides.


I agree on this .International experts will investigate the claims of both sides and desicions have to be accepted by both sides ...... Show your kochan ......not just playing with figures or percentages ....got to be proved !!!!!!

who ever has mouth speaks ! I can say whole world belongs to me !
Do ı have kotchans of it ...... No ...... but still i can say .... it is mine .

claims are in Cyprus look like this ..... Only international investigations and researches will end this claims .... not what i or they says !!!!!!
halil
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8804
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: nicosia

Postby Get Real! » Mon May 25, 2009 8:21 am

halil wrote:I agree on this .International experts will investigate the claims of both sides and desicions have to be accepted by both sides ...... Show your kochan ......not just playing with figures or percentages ....got to be proved !!!!!!

who ever has mouth speaks ! I can say whole world belongs to me !
Do ı have kotchans of it ...... No ...... but still i can say .... it is mine .

claims are in Cyprus look like this ..... Only international investigations and researches will end this claims .... not what i or they says !!!!!!

And what if they find that you actually own less than anyone ever thought? Will you accept that as FINAL or will you be crying that they made a mistake and/or call it “propaganda”?

Everyone knows TCs can be so full of shit... :lol:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby halil » Mon May 25, 2009 9:35 am

Get Real! wrote:
halil wrote:I agree on this .International experts will investigate the claims of both sides and desicions have to be accepted by both sides ...... Show your kochan ......not just playing with figures or percentages ....got to be proved !!!!!!

who ever has mouth speaks ! I can say whole world belongs to me !
Do ı have kotchans of it ...... No ...... but still i can say .... it is mine .

claims are in Cyprus look like this ..... Only international investigations and researches will end this claims .... not what i or they says !!!!!!

And what if they find that you actually own less than anyone ever thought? Will you accept that as FINAL or will you be crying that they made a mistake and/or call it “propaganda”?

Everyone knows TCs can be so full of shit... :lol:


GR .... I don't know what to say about your mind . What is the point calling to people XXXXX it shows how low is your profile Sir .....

Of-course i will accept what the Kochans are says . I would not mind in the Bi-zonal ,Bi-communal solution even we have 10% mate . What i believe is Cyprus problem did not started from the properties problem.
halil
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8804
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: nicosia

Postby umit07 » Mon May 25, 2009 10:05 am

Paphitis wrote:
YFred wrote:GCs can't have it both ways, on one side to wish for every one to have their land back and the other none if it belonged to Efkaf. Yeah right.


But there is absolutely no such thing as Efkaf Land registered under the 1960 Zurich Agreements or Cyprus Land Reigistry..... :lol:


Yes there is :lol: . Most of the land my grandparents cultivated on was rented land from the Evkaf this continued until 74.
User avatar
umit07
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2075
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:02 pm

Postby YFred » Mon May 25, 2009 11:42 am

umit07 wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
YFred wrote:GCs can't have it both ways, on one side to wish for every one to have their land back and the other none if it belonged to Efkaf. Yeah right.


But there is absolutely no such thing as Efkaf Land registered under the 1960 Zurich Agreements or Cyprus Land Reigistry..... :lol:


Yes there is :lol: . Most of the land my grandparents cultivated on was rented land from the Evkaf this continued until 74.

Umit, please don't demoralise Bafidis, he was having a nice dream and you woke him up. Bit more info for him. Efkaf land apparently belongs to god, and hence can never be sold. This from the horse’s mouth.

It seems the disease is catching. The real feeling some of our forumers are coming out. Not that just because it wasn’t said, it wasn’t noticed before.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby boomerang » Mon May 25, 2009 1:28 pm

when a new colonial power comes the old rules are thrown out and new ones take their place...yes the ottoboys made rules but these rules were turfed when a new colonial power came along...

look at the land registry for clarification...

The land didn't belong to the ottoboys in the first place...they just grabeed it...then the british grabbed it...nothing new...

not accepting this then you need to accept the land didn't belong to the ottoboys in the firts place...

allah wasn't in Cyprus before the ottoboys landed...
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

Postby EPSILON » Mon May 25, 2009 1:33 pm

kurupetos wrote:Hi Halil,

I was just thinking, is the nearby ancient city-state of Salamis on Evkaf land as well? :wink:

Image

Image


This is very wrong, the pictured area is very new and created by Mustafa Kemal!!!
User avatar
EPSILON
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2851
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: ATHENS

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests