Oracle wrote:Piss off with your pseudo - quasi religious pretender secularists property-fortune making ventures.
Europe is not fooled .....
Money grabbing land stealing Turks out of Cyprus ...
End of!
The Cypriot wrote:Oracle wrote:Piss off with your pseudo - quasi religious pretender secularists property-fortune making ventures.
Europe is not fooled .....
Money grabbing land stealing Turks out of Cyprus ...
End of!
Why limit yourself to Turks? Money grabbing, stolen-land buying Brits (and other criminals) out of Cyprus too!
Cypriots ought not to discriminate. All foreigners exploiting the island and its people should also be targets of our bile.
Kifeas wrote:“Get Real,” I can assure you the last thing I care is to play anything with you, set aside what you suggested! The only thing I did was to correct the nonsense you and Paphitis keep repeating, namely that there is no such a thing as Evkaf land or properties in Cyprus, simply because the truth is that there is such land registered in the RoC land registry, even now as we speak! Now, if the case is as you describe it, i.e. that they are all in fact stolen properties, then you need to also explain to us why the British did not take all of the Evkaf properties with the law they passed in 1944, and instead only a portion of it. Furthermore, you need to explain to us why the RoC continues to this day to recognize the properties under Evkaf's name, as they were registered in the Land Registry it inherited from the British in 1960, if they were all stolen by the Ottomans properties. Is the RoC covering up theft too?
Since you claim you have researched the matter, would you care tell and enlighten us how the Ottomans stole and then justified their theft, and also what this 1944 British "immovable property law" says? Can you also explain to us, since you have researched the matter, what the status of property ownership in Cyprus was in 1571, when the Ottoman invaded? Can you also explain how the GO Church of Cyprus became the single biggest land owner in Cyprus? Can you please be specific and with quotes and sources if possible, so as to avoid being blamed by me or anybody else that you do not know what you are saying, and instead talk out of your bottom or make up things as you go?
YFred wrote:
Are you suggesting that because the TCs are secular, they do not deserve the Efkaf lands, so it should be left to the GCs?
Have you gone completely mental?
Oracle wrote:YFred wrote:
Are you suggesting that because the TCs are secular, they do not deserve the Efkaf lands, so it should be left to the GCs?
Have you gone completely mental?
Either you are with God or against God ... You cannot claim land for religious purposes when you pretend to be secular.
You pretend to be Cypriot to steal Cypriot land and you pretend to be Efkatish to steal Cypriot land ....
All in all you just want to steal Cypriot land!
So phoook fof stealing Turks!
Oracle wrote:Since TCs claim to be "secular" ... I claim all land set-aside for Mosques etc. ...... as common land!
Go on Phooking TCs ... admit you are Phooking Muslims!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests