It’s official then – The GC policy of RETURN of pre-owned 1974 property has now been reverted to “Compensation and Exchange”?
What does this ECJ court really mean, and what is it a pretext for? Has anyone actually sat down (any Greek Cypriot that is) and thought about the consequences of this method of resolving the Property issue of the Cyprus problem. Well, for those of you who may have missed the news lately, the EU Commission, of those that I have spoken to of course, have said that that this process of resolving the property issue (and its complete backing by the Greek Cypriots) clearly proves that they do not want to RETURN to their former properties but prefer to be compensated (financially) – Thus, setting the stage for a Two State resolution.
I guess we’ll soon have a “Velvet” agreement on the Cyprus matter.
Thanks!