Cyprus-Forum.com

[Oracle]

You haven't really answered my question.

GR! doesn't do "answers"

[bill cobbett]

You haven't really answered my question.

GR! doesn't do "answers"

GR = VP !!!!

[T_C]

If we were created by a higher being do you really think the rules of life down here would also apply "up there", to the creator itself?

If we were to go back to my analogy, it would be like a super computer we've created trying to work out what human life is like through the use of "execute.exe" or "000000000000000000000000000".

Saying "if God created the universe then who created God" is no different to the analogy I've given above...since you're using the basis of our lives (birth) and somehow trying to answer that of your creators...

[Get Real!]

My question is: if we accept (A), then what entity created the entity that created the Cosmos?

Did you honestly think your question was so spectacular that it had to be repeated and expanded?

Reversing the question is not an answer.

No, not spectacular, just logical. Expanded in order to facilitate discussion by showing the self-referencing nature of your argument. Does that bother you? Meant to delete the first version as a double post, I hope it did not cause any inconvenience.

You haven't really answered my question.

The corollary of my comment is that the agnostic view is the most logically consistent one thus far.

Someone has beaten you to it... read the whole thread.

I love cut & paste!

[miltiades]

What , me with my ..imaginary girlfriends and GR with his imaginary Creator , oh Boy !!

[Get Real!]

What , me with my ..imaginary girlfriends and GR with his imaginary Creator , oh Boy !!

Did you say you're 63? Can't be that long before you meet him...

[Hatter]

My question is: if we accept (A), then what entity created the entity that created the Cosmos?

Did you honestly think your question was so spectacular that it had to be repeated and expanded?

Reversing the question is not an answer.

No, not spectacular, just logical. Expanded in order to facilitate discussion by showing the self-referencing nature of your argument. Does that bother you? Meant to delete the first version as a double post, I hope it did not cause any inconvenience.

You haven't really answered my question.

The corollary of my comment is that the agnostic view is the most logically consistent one thus far.

Someone has beaten you to it... read the whole thread.

I love cut & paste!

Well, it beats giving proper answers, doesn't it GR?

[miltiades]

What , me with my ..imaginary girlfriends and GR with his imaginary Creator , oh Boy !!

Did you say you're 63? Can't be that long before you meet him...

I hope and ... pray that I meet him well before you do GR , you have a young family and mine are grown up , just the little ones one but they have their mummy and daddy to take care of them.Of course I shall meet him before you and I shall kick his ass for being such a male chauvinist cruel inconsiderate show off selfish Plonker ! Bit like you !

[Get Real!]

Of course I shall meet him before you and I shall kick his ass for being such a male chauvinist cruel inconsiderate show off selfish Plonker ! Bit like you !

I am his son after all...

[T_C]

Is there a history behind this picture?