erolz3 wrote:I would be happy to meet you because through both common sense and from direct personal experience I know that the impression you have of me as an indivdual and me you fomed solely from text only discussions like these may well be extermely distorted and not everything that seems evident from such exchanges may actualy be the case..
Since you make me need to say this again .... I have no "impression" of you as an individual, nor do I care for one. You are merely one of the most skilled, forumers posting here and your VAST experience gleaned from countless fora, has no match.
Unlike some of us trying to come up to speed with the politics and future direction of our country, you argue for taking away our Rights like some word-magician. Unable to counter direct questioning, you snip and quote to misrepresent the argument you failed to conquer by fair means.
Clearly you have a (mythical) reputation you wish to foster; but I am not politically motivated like you, so I would rather be taken as text to be debated with sensibly, according to the limits of THIS medium.
So apologies if I have dented your standing, but if we are to derive some benefit from these exchanges, it may be for those other forumers with whom you would like to create a favourable impression, so that they view you as the LAMB and not the WOLF!
Now, carry on debating with those you want to impress. I do not expect any more replies from you but, as and when I have time, I will continue to object to your demands for more Rights for certain people, than others!