Cyprus-Forum.com

[Kikapu]

No deal' this maybe viable if total seperation were being negotiated by if a 2 state BBF solution then no chance.

I'm only going by with your own reasoning, and as soon as your reasoning is shown to have gone out to lunch somewhere, you resort to "blackmailing", because you know very well, that 40% of the GC's refugees will not be coming to the north to live with you when they can have their land to be part of the south state. If there were offers made to have a 2-state partition solution, I doubt the GC’s will offer you more than 10% of total land and that’s with NO TC’s wanting to live in the south as a EU member country, but remain in the north and be part of Asia..! If many TC’s want to remain in the south, your share will be down to 5%.!

[Viewpoint]

No deal' this maybe viable if total seperation were being negotiated by if a 2 state BBF solution then no chance.

I'm only going by with your own reasoning, and as soon as your reasoning is shown to have gone out to lunch somewhere, you resort to "blackmailing", because you know very well, that 40% of the GC's refugees will not be coming to the north to live with you when they can have their land to be part of the south state. If there were offers made to have a 2-state partition solution, I doubt the GC’s will offer you more than 10% of total land and that’s with NO TC’s wanting to live in the south as a EU member country, but remain in the north and be part of Asia..! If many TC’s want to remain in the south, your share will be down to 5%.!

Rejected, you dont know what the hell you are talking about and are just pulling numbers out of your arse.

[Kikapu]

No deal' this maybe viable if total seperation were being negotiated by if a 2 state BBF solution then no chance.

I'm only going by with your own reasoning, and as soon as your reasoning is shown to have gone out to lunch somewhere, you resort to "blackmailing", because you know very well, that 40% of the GC's refugees will not be coming to the north to live with you when they can have their land to be part of the south state. If there were offers made to have a 2-state partition solution, I doubt the GC’s will offer you more than 10% of total land and that’s with NO TC’s wanting to live in the south as a EU member country, but remain in the north and be part of Asia..! If many TC’s want to remain in the south, your share will be down to 5%.!

Rejected, you dont know what the hell you are talking about and are just pulling numbers out of your arse.

And you get your figures from a "horses mouth" who claimed to have been on the AP negotiations, as if that carries any prestige with me.!

Are you sure it was his mouth you were getting your figures from and not the other end under his tail.!

Why am I even asking you this question, as if you can even tell the difference between the two ends, specially of someone who claims to have worked on the AP negotiations. Didn't the fool (horses mouth) realise, that such figures would help get a OXI vote from the GC's. Perhaps he thought no body would notice if he added 2+2 = 5.!

[YFred]

No deal' this maybe viable if total seperation were being negotiated by if a 2 state BBF solution then no chance.

I'm only going by with your own reasoning, and as soon as your reasoning is shown to have gone out to lunch somewhere, you resort to "blackmailing", because you know very well, that 40% of the GC's refugees will not be coming to the north to live with you when they can have their land to be part of the south state. If there were offers made to have a 2-state partition solution, I doubt the GC’s will offer you more than 10% of total land and that’s with NO TC’s wanting to live in the south as a EU member country, but remain in the north and be part of Asia..! If many TC’s want to remain in the south, your share will be down to 5%.!

Rejected, you dont know what the hell you are talking about and are just pulling numbers out of your arse.

And you get your figures from a "horses mouth" who claimed to have been on the AP negotiations, as if that carries any prestige with me.!

Are you sure it was his mouth you were getting your figures from and not the other end under his tail.!

Why am I even asking you this question, as if you can even tell the difference between the two ends, specially of someone who claims to have worked on the AP negotiations. Didn't the fool (horses mouth) realise, that such figures would help get a OXI vote from the GC's. Perhaps he thought no body would notice if he added 2+2 = 5.!

Kiks, have you any idea how much Christofias has offered in these talks?

[boomerang]

No deal' this maybe viable if total seperation were being negotiated by if a 2 state BBF solution then no chance.

I'm only going by with your own reasoning, and as soon as your reasoning is shown to have gone out to lunch somewhere, you resort to "blackmailing", because you know very well, that 40% of the GC's refugees will not be coming to the north to live with you when they can have their land to be part of the south state. If there were offers made to have a 2-state partition solution, I doubt the GC’s will offer you more than 10% of total land and that’s with NO TC’s wanting to live in the south as a EU member country, but remain in the north and be part of Asia..! If many TC’s want to remain in the south, your share will be down to 5%.!

Rejected, you dont know what the hell you are talking about and are just pulling numbers out of your arse.

And you get your figures from a "horses mouth" who claimed to have been on the AP negotiations, as if that carries any prestige with me.!

Are you sure it was his mouth you were getting your figures from and not the other end under his tail.!

Why am I even asking you this question, as if you can even tell the difference between the two ends, specially of someone who claims to have worked on the AP negotiations. Didn't the fool (horses mouth) realise, that such figures would help get a OXI vote from the GC's. Perhaps he thought no body would notice if he added 2+2 = 5.!

Kiks, have you any idea how much Christofias has offered in these talks?

You don't get it do you knucklehead?

This ruling has changed the "might is right" policy...

A new dawn for a new era...is what this ruling set knucklehead...

[YFred]

No deal' this maybe viable if total seperation were being negotiated by if a 2 state BBF solution then no chance.

I'm only going by with your own reasoning, and as soon as your reasoning is shown to have gone out to lunch somewhere, you resort to "blackmailing", because you know very well, that 40% of the GC's refugees will not be coming to the north to live with you when they can have their land to be part of the south state. If there were offers made to have a 2-state partition solution, I doubt the GC’s will offer you more than 10% of total land and that’s with NO TC’s wanting to live in the south as a EU member country, but remain in the north and be part of Asia..! If many TC’s want to remain in the south, your share will be down to 5%.!

Rejected, you dont know what the hell you are talking about and are just pulling numbers out of your arse.

And you get your figures from a "horses mouth" who claimed to have been on the AP negotiations, as if that carries any prestige with me.!

Are you sure it was his mouth you were getting your figures from and not the other end under his tail.!

Why am I even asking you this question, as if you can even tell the difference between the two ends, specially of someone who claims to have worked on the AP negotiations. Didn't the fool (horses mouth) realise, that such figures would help get a OXI vote from the GC's. Perhaps he thought no body would notice if he added 2+2 = 5.!

Kiks, have you any idea how much Christofias has offered in these talks?

You don't get it do you knucklehead?

This ruling has changed the "might is right" policy...

A new dawn for a new era...is what this ruling set knucklehead...

You see I knew you were kiks all along. You just forgot to switch your user name:lol:

[boomerang]

No deal' this maybe viable if total seperation were being negotiated by if a 2 state BBF solution then no chance.

I'm only going by with your own reasoning, and as soon as your reasoning is shown to have gone out to lunch somewhere, you resort to "blackmailing", because you know very well, that 40% of the GC's refugees will not be coming to the north to live with you when they can have their land to be part of the south state. If there were offers made to have a 2-state partition solution, I doubt the GC’s will offer you more than 10% of total land and that’s with NO TC’s wanting to live in the south as a EU member country, but remain in the north and be part of Asia..! If many TC’s want to remain in the south, your share will be down to 5%.!

Rejected, you dont know what the hell you are talking about and are just pulling numbers out of your arse.

And you get your figures from a "horses mouth" who claimed to have been on the AP negotiations, as if that carries any prestige with me.!

Are you sure it was his mouth you were getting your figures from and not the other end under his tail.!

Why am I even asking you this question, as if you can even tell the difference between the two ends, specially of someone who claims to have worked on the AP negotiations. Didn't the fool (horses mouth) realise, that such figures would help get a OXI vote from the GC's. Perhaps he thought no body would notice if he added 2+2 = 5.!

Kiks, have you any idea how much Christofias has offered in these talks?

You don't get it do you knucklehead?

This ruling has changed the "might is right" policy...

A new dawn for a new era...is what this ruling set knucklehead...

You see I knew you were kiks all along. You just forgot to switch your user name:lol:

might be but you will always be the knucklehead regardless what sign you use...

[YFred]

No deal' this maybe viable if total seperation were being negotiated by if a 2 state BBF solution then no chance.

I'm only going by with your own reasoning, and as soon as your reasoning is shown to have gone out to lunch somewhere, you resort to "blackmailing", because you know very well, that 40% of the GC's refugees will not be coming to the north to live with you when they can have their land to be part of the south state. If there were offers made to have a 2-state partition solution, I doubt the GC’s will offer you more than 10% of total land and that’s with NO TC’s wanting to live in the south as a EU member country, but remain in the north and be part of Asia..! If many TC’s want to remain in the south, your share will be down to 5%.!

Rejected, you dont know what the hell you are talking about and are just pulling numbers out of your arse.

And you get your figures from a "horses mouth" who claimed to have been on the AP negotiations, as if that carries any prestige with me.!

Are you sure it was his mouth you were getting your figures from and not the other end under his tail.!

Why am I even asking you this question, as if you can even tell the difference between the two ends, specially of someone who claims to have worked on the AP negotiations. Didn't the fool (horses mouth) realise, that such figures would help get a OXI vote from the GC's. Perhaps he thought no body would notice if he added 2+2 = 5.!

Kiks, have you any idea how much Christofias has offered in these talks?

You don't get it do you knucklehead?

This ruling has changed the "might is right" policy...

A new dawn for a new era...is what this ruling set knucklehead...

You see I knew you were kiks all along. You just forgot to switch your user name:lol:

might be but you will always be the knucklehead regardless what sign you use...

There is no might its only in the ter

[boomerang]

No deal' this maybe viable if total seperation were being negotiated by if a 2 state BBF solution then no chance.

I'm only going by with your own reasoning, and as soon as your reasoning is shown to have gone out to lunch somewhere, you resort to "blackmailing", because you know very well, that 40% of the GC's refugees will not be coming to the north to live with you when they can have their land to be part of the south state. If there were offers made to have a 2-state partition solution, I doubt the GC’s will offer you more than 10% of total land and that’s with NO TC’s wanting to live in the south as a EU member country, but remain in the north and be part of Asia..! If many TC’s want to remain in the south, your share will be down to 5%.!

Rejected, you dont know what the hell you are talking about and are just pulling numbers out of your arse.

And you get your figures from a "horses mouth" who claimed to have been on the AP negotiations, as if that carries any prestige with me.!

Are you sure it was his mouth you were getting your figures from and not the other end under his tail.!

Why am I even asking you this question, as if you can even tell the difference between the two ends, specially of someone who claims to have worked on the AP negotiations. Didn't the fool (horses mouth) realise, that such figures would help get a OXI vote from the GC's. Perhaps he thought no body would notice if he added 2+2 = 5.!

Kiks, have you any idea how much Christofias has offered in these talks?

You don't get it do you knucklehead?

This ruling has changed the "might is right" policy...

A new dawn for a new era...is what this ruling set knucklehead...

You see I knew you were kiks all along. You just forgot to switch your user name:lol:

might be but you will always be the knucklehead regardless what sign you use...

There is no might its only in the ter

ok who the hell put a stop to knucklehead's reality check...who?... huh?......

[YFred]

No deal' this maybe viable if total seperation were being negotiated by if a 2 state BBF solution then no chance.

I'm only going by with your own reasoning, and as soon as your reasoning is shown to have gone out to lunch somewhere, you resort to "blackmailing", because you know very well, that 40% of the GC's refugees will not be coming to the north to live with you when they can have their land to be part of the south state. If there were offers made to have a 2-state partition solution, I doubt the GC’s will offer you more than 10% of total land and that’s with NO TC’s wanting to live in the south as a EU member country, but remain in the north and be part of Asia..! If many TC’s want to remain in the south, your share will be down to 5%.!

Rejected, you dont know what the hell you are talking about and are just pulling numbers out of your arse.

And you get your figures from a "horses mouth" who claimed to have been on the AP negotiations, as if that carries any prestige with me.!

Are you sure it was his mouth you were getting your figures from and not the other end under his tail.!

Why am I even asking you this question, as if you can even tell the difference between the two ends, specially of someone who claims to have worked on the AP negotiations. Didn't the fool (horses mouth) realise, that such figures would help get a OXI vote from the GC's. Perhaps he thought no body would notice if he added 2+2 = 5.!

Kiks, have you any idea how much Christofias has offered in these talks?

You don't get it do you knucklehead?

This ruling has changed the "might is right" policy...

A new dawn for a new era...is what this ruling set knucklehead...

You see I knew you were kiks all along. You just forgot to switch your user name:lol:

might be but you will always be the knucklehead regardless what sign you use...

There is no might its only in the ter

ok who the hell put a stop to knucklehead's reality check...who?... huh?......

Do I have to explain? don't you get it? ol chap