The Cypriot wrote:Dear Baroness Ludford
British MEP slams Orams Cyprus ruling
I refer to the article in today's Famagusta Gazette (see link above) reporting on your press release on the Orams/Apostolides case. I am taking the liberty of copying this email to Lynne Featherstone MP who I voted for in the last election and who has a large number of other constituents of Cypriot origin in the hope that she might take this serious matter up with your party leadership.
As a firm believer in the principles I thought your party adhered to I was dismayed that a prominent MEP such as yourself should publicly declare that a decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) – one enabling a Cypriot refugee to seek recourse from the opportunist buyers of his stolen property – was strange.
I was even more dismayed that a Liberal Democrat politician, specialising in human rights and justice, should have such a flawed understanding of the admittedly complex Cyprus problem. I should like therefore to point out some fundamental misperceptions you appear to have about Cyprus which may have led to your 'strange' declaration.
EU law is suspended in the north of Cyprus not simply because of the 'division of the island' – as you claim – but because the legitimate government of the entire territory is unable to exercise effective control there. This is due to Turkey's huge military presence. Only aggressive might therefore prevents a court judgement from being enforced on the island and so there can be no justifiable reason why a refugee victim of such might should not pursue justice in another part of the EU, where Turkey's military does not interfere with the rule of law.
This being so the only parties the ECJ judgment is likely to 'bewilder', aside from yourself, are:
a) Turkey, together with its subordinate regime, which since 1974 has adhered to the entirely 'anti-liberal' philosophy of 'might-is-right' in the north of Cyprus and which has encouraged the sale of stolen property belonging to refugees who fled their homes in fear of their lives;
b) Unscrupulous buyers of these stolen properties – now rendered entirely worthless by the ECJ decision.
In regards to the Annan Plan – which you're still harking back to a full five years after the event – you really ought to consider why the overwhelming majority of the people of Cyprus, taken as a whole, exercised their democratic right to reject it. A plan suddenly presented to them, after decades of intransigence by Turkey, with the aim of exonerating this invading power for its crimes, just before Cyprus – having met all the accession criteria – joined the EU.
It was rejected because it sought to restrict the rights of Cypriots to have their property restored and to settle freely within their own homeland. It was rejected because it would have entrenched a repulsive system of apartheid on a tiny island and legitimised the presence of foreign occupation troops in perpetuity. No freedom-loving people in Europe, or the world, would have accepted such a settlement – except perhaps through desperation of a kind faced by Cypriots in the north, isolated from the world and dominated by a foreign military.
That over 75% of the electorate in the area of Cyprus free from Turkey's iron grip said "No" is an irrefutable indicator of the plan's merits as an equitable solution. It's time you let it go.
While I agree with you that it is very important that the EU finally weighs in to help push forward a political settlement on the island it can only work and will only be acceptable to the majority of Cypriots if it is fully in accordance with EU laws and democratic principles – not a rehash of the totally discredited Annan Plan.
Unfortunately, such a settlement, by Cypriots and for Cypriots, is unlikely ever to be acceptable to Turkey, or the settlers it has imported to the island (now outnumbering indigenous Cypriots by 2 to 1 in the north); settlers who have been given the right by Turkey's subordinate regime to vote on any such settlement plan.
This is why Cypriot refugees feel they have no option but to pursue justice through the only means available to them, the EU courts.
And if you were true to your principles as a Liberal Democrat MEP, specialising in human rights and justice, you would support them.
An illiterate response from the Lib 'nice but' Dims
Dear Mr Cypriot
Thank you for your email and for your support for the Liberal Democats.
I am soy you did not eceive a reply to you previous email and I can only
assume this was a simple error - Sarah Ludfford is usually very go about
responding to everyone.
I will foward your email to sarah again and also to our second placed
candidate, Jonathan Fryer whom I'm sure will respond!
Best wishes
Flick Rea
Regional Administrator
London Liberal Democrats