RichardB wrote:Ahhh Natassha
anagram 'Has Satan'
now I'm worried GR
There goes my scandal!
Get Real! wrote:It should be read as it was intended to Oracle…
“MANUFACTURING AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL THESIS”
She presents nothing noteworthy? Oracle, if I were to cut & paste all the sections that debunk the Greek myths we would end up with a whole booklet!
Anyway, I'm not going to waste any more time about this here with those living in denial, because this is valuable time that I could spend liaising with Natassha!
Oracle wrote:Get Real! wrote:It should be read as it was intended to Oracle…
“MANUFACTURING AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL THESIS”
She presents nothing noteworthy? Oracle, if I were to cut & paste all the sections that debunk the Greek myths we would end up with a whole booklet!
Anyway, I'm not going to waste any more time about this here with those living in denial, because this is valuable time that I could spend liaising with Natassha!
Natasha is Greek! ... and she would take you for an uneducated fool (which I know you are not) due to your inability to understand how a neutral academic dissertation is presented ... with evidence in support of one or other case .... and then a conclusion to be drawn.
Get Real! wrote:Oracle wrote:Get Real! wrote:It should be read as it was intended to Oracle…
“MANUFACTURING AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL THESIS”
She presents nothing noteworthy? Oracle, if I were to cut & paste all the sections that debunk the Greek myths we would end up with a whole booklet!
Anyway, I'm not going to waste any more time about this here with those living in denial, because this is valuable time that I could spend liaising with Natassha!
Natasha is Greek! ... and she would take you for an uneducated fool (which I know you are not) due to your inability to understand how a neutral academic dissertation is presented ... with evidence in support of one or other case .... and then a conclusion to be drawn.
I will NEVER allow you to come in between me and Natassha!
Paphitis wrote:boomerang wrote:Paphitis wrote:boomerang wrote:Paphitis wrote:boomerang wrote:Paphitis wrote:Just because there were Aboriginal tribes in Australia does not mean that Australians are direct descendants of these people and the same applies to Modern Cypriots.
Australians are the direct descendants of European settlers as Cypriots are also mostly the descendants of predominantly Mycenaean and Arcadian settlers.
yes mate today you can say this...but here comes the but...what will history say in 3000 years?...
I like how you say mostly...whaty makes you say mostly...any figures perhaps, or you going by what someone says in the 19th century?
assimilation is assimilation either way you see it...mostly means there were others...perhaps the true cypriots...
In 3,000 years, Cyprus will be mostly Sri Lankan and Indian for all we know.
well atleast we will know what history has installed for us...
Are you denying the fact that Australia is now mostly European and Cyprus is mostly Hellenic?
no i do not deny it that both were through assimilation...do accept it...NO...
So are you an assimilated Aboriginal?
Only 0.54% of Australia's population claims Aboriginal Ancestry and the remaining are predominately European.
So most Australians are not Aboriginal but are from many nations and predominantly from Europe. The same thing applies to Cyprus because 80% of the population is Hellenic.
Oracle wrote:Get Real! wrote:Oracle wrote:Get Real! wrote:It should be read as it was intended to Oracle…
“MANUFACTURING AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL THESIS”
She presents nothing noteworthy? Oracle, if I were to cut & paste all the sections that debunk the Greek myths we would end up with a whole booklet!
Anyway, I'm not going to waste any more time about this here with those living in denial, because this is valuable time that I could spend liaising with Natassha!
Natasha is Greek! ... and she would take you for an uneducated fool (which I know you are not) due to your inability to understand how a neutral academic dissertation is presented ... with evidence in support of one or other case .... and then a conclusion to be drawn.
I will NEVER allow you to come in between me and Natassha!
I'm sure she would view you as another of those Cypriot artifacts which are unclassifiable then assimilate you too, as all good Greeks have previously assimilated Choirokitians .....
The Hellenisation of GR! by Natasha.
The Cypriot wrote:Notice the remarkable similarities between the facial features of an alien and a Cypriot; in particularly the nose and mouth.
Get Real! wrote:Oracle wrote:Get Real! wrote:Oracle wrote:Get Real! wrote:It should be read as it was intended to Oracle…
“MANUFACTURING AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL THESIS”
She presents nothing noteworthy? Oracle, if I were to cut & paste all the sections that debunk the Greek myths we would end up with a whole booklet!
Anyway, I'm not going to waste any more time about this here with those living in denial, because this is valuable time that I could spend liaising with Natassha!
Natasha is Greek! ... and she would take you for an uneducated fool (which I know you are not) due to your inability to understand how a neutral academic dissertation is presented ... with evidence in support of one or other case .... and then a conclusion to be drawn.
I will NEVER allow you to come in between me and Natassha!
I'm sure she would view you as another of those Cypriot artifacts which are unclassifiable then assimilate you too, as all good Greeks have previously assimilated Choirokitians .....
The Hellenisation of GR! by Natasha.
Oh, I don't know who is going to assimilate who... I can be quite a charmer...
Oracle wrote:I think the extra-terrestrial looks more like Talat
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests