Cyprus-Forum.com

[miltiades]

so how many times have they bitten your ass off milti

Are you talking about my dentures or VP's secretary ?

[boomerang]

so how many times have they bitten your ass off milti

Are you talking about my dentures or VP's secretary ?

Now that you've mentioned the secretary...both

[Viewpoint]

(LETTER SENT TO ECONOMIST)

My letter must have rattled VP for the propaganda machine to roll into action so quickly. Shame about the sloppy typos though.

Dear sir

I wish to congratulate your esteemed publication

I've already told you VP, no one likes an arse-licker.

The Economist and there analysis of the divided island of Cyprus (A Hawkish problem, April 23rd 2009). It clearly identifys

Need to get your spelling right. Simple errors weaken your case.

the issues currently at hand and the devlopments leading to the impass.

second spelling mistake... you rushed it, VP. One more and it's in the editor's bin.

The Greek Cypriots

Notice I didn't use the term Greek Cypriot or Turkish Cypriot once. I just focused on the people – the human beings – of the island as a whole. Because that's what matters to the rest of the world. They don't give a stuff about what they consider to be our pathetic internal tribal problems.

have worked very hard over the past 5 years to demonize the Annan Plan

As I pointed out in my letter, the plan was rejected by 75% of free and legitimate citizens. No more demonising is necessary.

as it did not give them what they desired a Greek Cypriot state over not 63% but 100% of the island reducing Turkish Cypriots to what they believe is their rightful place, minority status.

You've got this habit of talking on behalf of others which gives you no credibility on this forum and certainly no credibility in a letter to an editor, esp. when you're talking about what you're clearly presenting as your enemy. How would you know what they believe? the editor will be asking.

Now that they have wormed their way into the EU using Greece

too late VP.... Cyprus may have wormed, Greece may have helped but she's in now and you're crying over spilt airanin. And that's the problem the original article was trying but unable to address.

they hope the solution they demand will just drop out of the sky on a plate c/o of the EU.

Again talking on behalf of the enemy. The editor is giving a deep sigh.

To this end they feelthat using their newly found toy leverage over Turkey will get them what they so long for.

Again talking on behalf of the enemy. The editor is giving a deeper sigh. What constructive point is this incoherent illiterate actually trying to make? he's asking.

They naively forget that Turkey is a major power in the region

The editor is now losing his will to live. How could little Cyprus forget that Turkey is a regional power when 40,000 of its troops are parked on their land?

as acknowledged by the USA

Oh, well that's a good argument to use in relation to EU matters. The editor is googling a local restaurant to book lunch.

and will not stand for 700.000 GCs blocking their way into the EU if that was their current goal,

Threats? Is this your way of ingratiating yourself to the Economist and putting forward an alternative credible case?

which at the moment it is clearly not, if we take into account Turkeys

Third typo - no apostrophe on Turkey's. End of the road VP. Letter is in the bin.

stance on the ports issue and lack of progress in closing EU aquis chapters this clearly indicates that EU accession is on a back burner therefore nulifying GC leverage.

If that's the case why are you congratulating an article that states the "EU complicated matters hugely by letting Cyprus join". The editor thinks you're wasting his time.

Sanctions are a stadistic way for Greek Cypriots to make us pay for their loss of land and control over the North of the island which we must never forget also belongs to Turkish Cypriots, they conveniently forget our losses until 2004 continued to tell the world only their side of the story, never once admitting their wrongs towards the Turkish Cypriots.

Only concerned with the human rights of one side, not of all the people of Cyprus. Tit-for-tat. The world isn't interested in tit-for-tat. The editor is on twitter updating his status. "Save me from the monotony of my job."

The whole situaiton

Spelling isn't your strong point, is it VP? Attention to detail is valued in a letter writer. Your letter is being picked up by the recycling people and being made into loo roll.

has now changed due to our acceptence of the Annan plan, a UN brokered Comprehensive Solution backed by the world including Greece.

But not by the only people that matter. The people who would have had to live with its consequences. The Cypriot people taken as a whole.

Countries are now waking up to the fact that their are 2 sides and that Greek Cypriots

Now you're talking on behalf of other countries. An editor worth his salt would want evidence to back up this unsubstantiated claim.

have been peddling a one sided version of the story to gain their ultimate goal of exluding Turkish Cypriots and controling the whole island.

An expert once more on what the enemy is trying to do. The editor is googling the name of a psychiatrist to recommend to you.

One again I and many Turkish Cypriots thank you for your balanced article

Yes. Because you're their arse-licking spokesperson. The editor has cracked open a bottle of Scotch to numb the pain of his existence.

and seeing the realities which this island faces at the hands of a hostile and revenge seeking Greek Cypriot "majority".

The editor is thinking, how come this guy is such an expert on what the "majority" is thinking. He's also thinking why has he put the word majority in speech marks. Actually he's no longer thinking. He's just quietly getting drunk.

VP stands for VERY POOR. Please try again.

Pity you spent so much wasted time on the spelling mistakes which were corrected by my secretary and also mind boggingly thinking you were the editor, rather than addressing the contents. The GCs are the opposing side so expressing this is not incorrect, we TCs have to continue to put our viewpoints accross, of course you will try to ridicule us becuase you have no real arguements to counter the realities and feel uncomfortable with having our side of the story being put forward.

VP you mast admitt that youare leeter was a blady disgrase , no newspaper edidor would tace mach notise of a litter with so meny spelling misteiks !!

The Cypriot , I hereby swear on the finest bottle of Claret ever to grace my table , a Chateau Petrus 1982 , MIDSM , soon I hope , that I shall never ever call you a Plonker regardless of what you say or do. Your letter to the Economist was superb , watch out for mine which will contain Plonkerisms yet to be heard or written by anyone !!

Its the content thats important not the spelling which is an excuse always used when one does not want to address the real issues, thought you would have been better than that only proves you are no different from the other fanatical sarcastic empty headed GCs.