insan wrote:miltiades wrote:insan wrote:miltiades wrote:insan wrote:Miltiades wrote:By 1958 the number of Cypriot police had risen to 5475 of which G/Cs were 930, T/Cs 3832 British 657 , others 56.
Its clear here that the notorious British dogma of divide and rule was in full swing.
Why divide and rule, Miltiades? EOKA began struggling for Enosis in 1955. TCs were against Enosis, beside a Greek-GC ruled Cyprus. Right? Under such circumstances, what's wrong with Brits recruiting TCs as police auxilaries? What's wrong with TCs who accepted to join British Police force to struggle against EOKA? What's wrong with establishment of TMT as a counter organization to EOKA?
Had there been no armed struggle between 2 underground organizations(I wish it didn't happen) and no Enosis/Taksim demands; there would have been still a problem.
As I always stated the essential of the problem is power sharing in Cyprus. TCs want equal power sharing on legislative and judicial bodies because all Turks and TCs r aware of that Hellenes haven't forgotten and forgiven 1453, 1571, 1974.
Our common past kills every possibility for TCs voluntarily accepting minority status or with ur words "equal citizenship" in Cyprus.
Keep considering ur EOKA fighters how u wish but don't forget that the leader of both EOKAs was the same man; even most probably vast majority of EOKA-B members were EOKA members.
Anyway, I hope at least u r aware of that no TCs accept EOKA as liberation fighters of Cyprus but maybe Kikapu and his like minded TCs; I'm not sre.
Miltiades wrote:The T/Cs are at the moment ruled and dictated to right now by a foreign country , I doubt whether they will remain oblivious to their graduial assimilation , or rather extinction by Turkey.Sooner or later they will rebel , take it from me its a matter of time before more and more voices are raised against the Turkish occupation.
This is ur and ur leadership only dream; a part of Akritas plan. Fabian Tactics: "Economically isolate them till they rebel against our enemies and help us free our country from Turks." Keep pursuing the same policy. Vast majority of TCs emigrated because of economic difficulties they faced in Northern Cyprus not because they were against Turkey and the so-called occupation army. Those TCs r angry with GC-Greek leadership and ur foreign backers.
If u reckon that ur foreign backers give support to ur cause and demands bcz of u r the rightful side; u r mistaken. They abuse one of ur weaknesses for their own interests. It is a fact that GC-Greek leadership like this mutual interests game. Do they care abt the GC refugees? No of course.
All Cypriots as far as I'm concerned are the majority. The minute that a Cypriot becomes a Turk and a Greek , Armenian or Latin then of course one has to look as to the numbers that make up those who call themselves Greek , Turkish , Armenian etc. It looks as if the G/Cs are then the overwhelming majority , the T/Cs a size able minority and the rest a tiny minority. If you believe that the T/Cs are Turks first and then Cypriots then they are by definition based on numerical realities a minority and the Armenians and other an even smaller minority.
If however you are a Cypriot as I'm first and foremost and believes that my motherland is Cyprus then you are most certainly in the majority.
To hell with majorities , we are all Cypriots .
As far as the Brits using the T/Cs to fight against the EOKA movement , what would you say if the GERMANS DURING WORLD WAR TWO , used the minorities in the various countries that they occupied to fight those that were engaged in their liberation struggle , in France for instance they could have used the small minority of Algerians or even Jews .
Milti,
TCs r TCs, GCs r GCs. We r all Cypriots not as a nation but as people born in Cyprus and having a unique to us Cypriot life style, tarditions and culture. Our Cypriotness stops there. The GC-Greek leadership and political interest groups of Greece and GCs have always collaborated and cooperated for their own common national interests and causes. Just a few days ago they reaffirmed this, during the visit of Karamanalis. The TC-Turkey leadership and political interest groups of TCs and Turkey have almsot same or similar relations. Why u pretending that u r not aware of these facts?
I'm VERY aware of these events and I'm saddened that we have not as yet become mature enough to stand on our own two feet and proudly declare our Independent Cypriotness . I understand that the 40 thousand Turkish occupying troops have something to do with our insecurities and I also understand that such events also cause the T/Cs to become more attached to the occupiers. I only wish I could encourage the Cypriot government to launch a programme designed to remove foreign influences surrounding our efforts to find a solution , there again I wish I could encourage Turkey to allow the T/Cs a voice that can be heard not as I beleive silenced by the settlers and the Turkish army.
Not long ago we learned of the T/C youths arrested for having the audacity ... to demand the removal of the occupying army from Cyprus .
Let me tell you something you can change historical names like the names of towns and villages but you can never change history , another thing I would like to remind Turkey off .
A several TC youngsters who were either really against the existence of Turkish troops in North or paid/decieved by some political groups to demonstrate against Turkish troops; only represent themselves. You r tending to take those type of TCs as a reference for yourself but rejecting to take reference vast majority of TC youngsters who wishes the existence of Turkish troops in North.
As I told u Milti, if u were right vast majority of TCs would have asked refuge from the so-called RoC...
As for the names of the villages and towns... Milti, even pre-74, most of the villages in Cyprus had one TC name and one GC name. Others who had one name were pronounced and written slighltly different by the people of 2 communities, respectively.
Here's a few examples:
1- Mari - Tatlısu
2- Lefkosia - Lefkoşa
3- Lemessos - Leymosun or Limasol
4- Varosha - Marash
5- Famagusta - Mağusa
Still today, TCs call most of the villages and towns in South with their Turkish names or pronounciations. For example u say Paphos, we say Baf. Maybe Ottomanized? Halil should be more knowledged abt the Turkish and Greek names of the villages in whole Cyprus.
At this occassion I'd like to ask Halil whether those 112 Turkish villages in South Cyprus were established by Ottomans or they were ex-catholic villages... Which villages were built by Ottomans from scratch during the Ottoman rule? Any ideas Milti?
Insan, for many years I have studied medieval maps of Cyprus. Studied their names/derivation of names and locations. I doubt if there were any solely Ottoman built villages at all. I'd like to think that I am wrong but there is no evidence to support this. I doubt if anyone could give a definitive answer.
I have close links with two wholly TC villages (pre-1974). Namely Civisil/Kivisili/Cevizli and Copno/Kophinou/Kofunye/Gecitkale in the Larnaka district. In the middle of Kivisili/Civisil there is a lovely small Byzantine church. Used (in peace time) once a year for the annual Panagiri. In Aşağı Köfünye/Lower Kophinou there were remnants of an old chapel - sıgn of an old Byzantıne church IMO. That was in 1958. I was too young to ask questions as to where are all the inhabitants of these villages. However in my village of Anglissidhes, there was a GC farmer, known as Gofunyodis/ Kophiniote. His ancestors had obviously lived in Kophinou. A nice man he was with a lovely daughter with red cheeks.