The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Direct flights to North Cyprus will be heard in High Court

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Direct flights to North Cyprus will be heard in High Court

Postby halil » Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:24 pm

Challenge to ban on direct flights to North Cyprus will be heard in High Court :!: :!: :!:

There is an ongoing ban on direct flights between UK airports and North Cyprus. The ban, which has lasted 35 years, has caused considerable inconvenience to those travelling between the two countries on family, business, or holiday visits.
Cyprus Turkish Airlines (CTA) and its UK tour operator, CTA Holidays Limited, have launched a legal challenge to the UK government's refusal of permission to operate direct flights between the two countries. The case will be heard in the Administrative Court, a division of the High Court, in the week beginning 18 May 2009.
Currently, CTA, together with all other airlines, must land in Turkey en route both to and from northern Cyprus. This increases flight times and costs, but has absolutely no operational justification.
The UK Government has repeatedly said that it is in favour of direct flights if permitting them is consistent with its obligations in international law. The Government, however, has refused all Cyprus Turkish Airlines' applications, claiming that direct flights would be contrary to the 1944 Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation.
CTA's position is that the Government has misunderstood the Chicago Convention or its impact on the legality of direct flights, and that the Government should therefore grant their applications. As it is, the legal requirement for passengers to land in Turkey en route to northern Cyprus:
- Results in higher air fares for travellers
- Places unfair restrictions on Turkish Cypriot individuals and companies
wishing to travel and conduct business with the EU and the rest of the
world
- Extends the distance and thus makes the journey longer.
- Results in substantial additional carbon emissions from the unnecessary
take-offs and landings.
CTA already flies around 100,000 visitors from the UK to northern Cyprus each year, but the lack of direct flights deters tourists and places it at a competitive disadvantage. Northern Cyprus is an attractive destination because of its climate, beaches, unspoilt natural beauty and historical sites and has great potential as a tourist destination. The country also has a low cost of living which is a boon to British holiday-makers and expatriates.
CTA believes the ban on direct flights to and from northern Cyprus - currently imposed by Britain's CAA (Civil Aviation Authority) - is both unlawful and unjust. By challenging it in the High Court, CTA is hoping to increase northern Cyprus's growing potential as a Mediterranean holiday venue.
The implementation of the direct flights ban to and from northern Cyprus and the resulting isolation and inconvenience has long been a contentious issue. As Prime Minister, Tony Blair re-stated the Government's position on direct flights during his visit to Turkey on 18th May 2004, when he said: "I think it is important, that we end the isolation of northern Cyprus.....That means lifting the embargoes in respect to trade, and in respect to air travel."
However, since this statement was made, no progress has been achieved in restoring them.
To sum up this isolation and the embargoes:
1. Turkish Cypriots have been isolated by most of the international community since 1963 and deprived of direct flights since 1974. A UN plan for reunification was put to a referendum in 2004. The Turkish Cypriots voted 'Yes', with 65% in favour. Unfortunately, the Greek Cypriots rejected the settlement plan by a 76% majority. Following the referendum, the then Secretary-General, Kofi Annan, called for an end to the isolation of northern Cyprus. This would have included the resumption of direct flights.
2. The Court is unlikely to give judgment at or immediately after the hearing. A decision might still be a matter of months away, thus causing further delays and frustration for those planning to visit the country for their summer holidays or to see their relations.
halil
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8804
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: nicosia

Re: Direct flights to North Cyprus will be heard in High Cou

Postby DT. » Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:29 pm

halil wrote:Challenge to ban on direct flights to North Cyprus will be heard in High Court :!: :!: :!:

There is an ongoing ban on direct flights between UK airports and North Cyprus. The ban, which has lasted 35 years, has caused considerable inconvenience to those travelling between the two countries on family, business, or holiday visits.
Cyprus Turkish Airlines (CTA) and its UK tour operator, CTA Holidays Limited, have launched a legal challenge to the UK government's refusal of permission to operate direct flights between the two countries. The case will be heard in the Administrative Court, a division of the High Court, in the week beginning 18 May 2009.
Currently, CTA, together with all other airlines, must land in Turkey en route both to and from northern Cyprus. This increases flight times and costs, but has absolutely no operational justification.
The UK Government has repeatedly said that it is in favour of direct flights if permitting them is consistent with its obligations in international law. The Government, however, has refused all Cyprus Turkish Airlines' applications, claiming that direct flights would be contrary to the 1944 Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation.
CTA's position is that the Government has misunderstood the Chicago Convention or its impact on the legality of direct flights, and that the Government should therefore grant their applications. As it is, the legal requirement for passengers to land in Turkey en route to northern Cyprus:
- Results in higher air fares for travellers
- Places unfair restrictions on Turkish Cypriot individuals and companies
wishing to travel and conduct business with the EU and the rest of the
world
- Extends the distance and thus makes the journey longer.
- Results in substantial additional carbon emissions from the unnecessary
take-offs and landings.
CTA already flies around 100,000 visitors from the UK to northern Cyprus each year, but the lack of direct flights deters tourists and places it at a competitive disadvantage. Northern Cyprus is an attractive destination because of its climate, beaches, unspoilt natural beauty and historical sites and has great potential as a tourist destination. The country also has a low cost of living which is a boon to British holiday-makers and expatriates.
CTA believes the ban on direct flights to and from northern Cyprus - currently imposed by Britain's CAA (Civil Aviation Authority) - is both unlawful and unjust. By challenging it in the High Court, CTA is hoping to increase northern Cyprus's growing potential as a Mediterranean holiday venue.
The implementation of the direct flights ban to and from northern Cyprus and the resulting isolation and inconvenience has long been a contentious issue. As Prime Minister, Tony Blair re-stated the Government's position on direct flights during his visit to Turkey on 18th May 2004, when he said: "I think it is important, that we end the isolation of northern Cyprus.....That means lifting the embargoes in respect to trade, and in respect to air travel."
However, since this statement was made, no progress has been achieved in restoring them.
To sum up this isolation and the embargoes:
1. Turkish Cypriots have been isolated by most of the international community since 1963 and deprived of direct flights since 1974. A UN plan for reunification was put to a referendum in 2004. The Turkish Cypriots voted 'Yes', with 65% in favour. Unfortunately, the Greek Cypriots rejected the settlement plan by a 76% majority. Following the referendum, the then Secretary-General, Kofi Annan, called for an end to the isolation of northern Cyprus. This would have included the resumption of direct flights.
2. The Court is unlikely to give judgment at or immediately after the hearing. A decision might still be a matter of months away, thus causing further delays and frustration for those planning to visit the country for their summer holidays or to see their relations.


And there you have it,
By challenging it in the High Court, CTA is hoping to increase northern Cyprus's growing potential as a Mediterranean holiday venue.

Its a publicity stunt which couldn't even be heard in the High court but an administrative court on which its merits as a case will be judged (if that). Unless you think Mehmet & Mehmet solicitors of the Seven Sisters Rd have a better idea of whats legal in the UK than the UK Attorney General.
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Re: Direct flights to North Cyprus will be heard in High Cou

Postby Get Real! » Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:31 pm

halil wrote:Cyprus Turkish Airlines (CTA) and its UK tour operator, CTA Holidays Limited, have launched a legal challenge to the UK government's refusal of permission to operate direct flights between the two countries.

They should start reading my articles and save themselves the unnecessary costs... :lol:

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle18.htm
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Re: Direct flights to North Cyprus will be heard in High Cou

Postby EPSILON » Fri Apr 24, 2009 3:03 pm

halil wrote:Challenge to ban on direct flights to North Cyprus will be heard in High Court :!: :!: :!:

There is an ongoing ban on direct flights between UK airports and North Cyprus. The ban, which has lasted 35 years, has caused considerable inconvenience to those travelling between the two countries on family, business, or holiday visits.
Cyprus Turkish Airlines (CTA) and its UK tour operator, CTA Holidays Limited, have launched a legal challenge to the UK government's refusal of permission to operate direct flights between the two countries. The case will be heard in the Administrative Court, a division of the High Court, in the week beginning 18 May 2009.
Currently, CTA, together with all other airlines, must land in Turkey en route both to and from northern Cyprus. This increases flight times and costs, but has absolutely no operational justification.
The UK Government has repeatedly said that it is in favour of direct flights if permitting them is consistent with its obligations in international law. The Government, however, has refused all Cyprus Turkish Airlines' applications, claiming that direct flights would be contrary to the 1944 Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation.
CTA's position is that the Government has misunderstood the Chicago Convention or its impact on the legality of direct flights, and that the Government should therefore grant their applications. As it is, the legal requirement for passengers to land in Turkey en route to northern Cyprus:
- Results in higher air fares for travellers
- Places unfair restrictions on Turkish Cypriot individuals and companies
wishing to travel and conduct business with the EU and the rest of the
world
- Extends the distance and thus makes the journey longer.
- Results in substantial additional carbon emissions from the unnecessary
take-offs and landings.
CTA already flies around 100,000 visitors from the UK to northern Cyprus each year, but the lack of direct flights deters tourists and places it at a competitive disadvantage. Northern Cyprus is an attractive destination because of its climate, beaches, unspoilt natural beauty and historical sites and has great potential as a tourist destination. The country also has a low cost of living which is a boon to British holiday-makers and expatriates.
CTA believes the ban on direct flights to and from northern Cyprus - currently imposed by Britain's CAA (Civil Aviation Authority) - is both unlawful and unjust. By challenging it in the High Court, CTA is hoping to increase northern Cyprus's growing potential as a Mediterranean holiday venue.
The implementation of the direct flights ban to and from northern Cyprus and the resulting isolation and inconvenience has long been a contentious issue. As Prime Minister, Tony Blair re-stated the Government's position on direct flights during his visit to Turkey on 18th May 2004, when he said: "I think it is important, that we end the isolation of northern Cyprus.....That means lifting the embargoes in respect to trade, and in respect to air travel."
However, since this statement was made, no progress has been achieved in restoring them.
To sum up this isolation and the embargoes:
1. Turkish Cypriots have been isolated by most of the international community since 1963 and deprived of direct flights since 1974. A UN plan for reunification was put to a referendum in 2004. The Turkish Cypriots voted 'Yes', with 65% in favour. Unfortunately, the Greek Cypriots rejected the settlement plan by a 76% majority. Following the referendum, the then Secretary-General, Kofi Annan, called for an end to the isolation of northern Cyprus. This would have included the resumption of direct flights.
2. The Court is unlikely to give judgment at or immediately after the hearing. A decision might still be a matter of months away, thus causing further delays and frustration for those planning to visit the country for their summer holidays or to see their relations.


This case is very simple to be solved. Give the control of the airport to the official government of the ROC and direct flights will start immdly,not only from UK but from all interested countries/airlines.

NOTE to exercise your mind: Even you find some "good friends" in UK high court their possible favourable decision will be rejected by IATA and EU council.

Now i realize that i have something to exercise my mind also: how Turkish airlines fly to North Cyprus?do they have IATA's permission to do so or in a case of an accident neither insurance or IATA will recognize passengers rights!!!!
User avatar
EPSILON
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2851
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: ATHENS

Postby EPSILON » Fri Apr 24, 2009 3:16 pm

Eurocontrol concerned about illegal airport in occupied Cyprus

The existence of the illegally operating airport in Turkish-occupied Cyprus creates problems in air safety, notes Eurocontrol, calling for an international meeting to take place in order to end practices applied by Turkey and the illegal airport authorities.

In statements to CNA Thursday, on the sidelines of an International Seminar on air safety, Eurocontrol Deputy Director of ATM Strategies, Lex
Hendriks, stressed that the airline industry and the pilots express concern over the existence of the illegal airport (Ercan), which confuses pilots and threatens air safety.

"I am a pilot myself and very often I fly through this region. The airline industry and the pilots are very concerned about the inadequate interfaces between Cyprus and its northern neighbour Turkey, because of the introduction of an ATC service (in occupied Cyprus) that is not recognized by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)", he said.

The Eurocontrol official said that no matter how politically sensitive this issue is, it
must be resolved since "it is a potentially unsafe situation".

''We cannot leave this hanging, it has to be resolved, it is a potentially unsafe situation and I know it is politically very sensitive but we should address it and resolve it'', Hendriks told a seminar on air safety Thursday.

Answering questions by CNA, he explained that Turkey requests from all aircraft flying from Turkey to the airspace of Cyprus to call the illegal airport in the Turkish occupied areas of Cyprus for further instructions.

Most pilots, he said, are well aware of the situation with the illegal airport and ask for instructions from the internationally recognized airport of Larnaca, but there are others who do not know enough about the situation.

"It is very unsafe to have two different radios in Cyprus", he warned.
Hendriks called for "an international seminar to take place on the highest level so that a solution is found to stop Turkey's and Ercan's practices".

He told CNA that the whole situation is causing great concern among pilots.
Answering a question, Hendriks said that although Turkey refuses to recognize the Republic of Cyprus, the issue needs to be addressed, since air traffic in Cyprus will increase year by year.

Since 1974 the Republic of Cyprus is divided by Turkish troops, which occupy one third of the island's territory.

Turkey, a country aspiring to enter the EU, is refusing to recognize Cyprus.
In November 1983 Turkey proclaimed a self-styled regime in the northern occupied areas, which only Ankara recognizes.
User avatar
EPSILON
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2851
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: ATHENS

Postby EPSILON » Fri Apr 24, 2009 3:19 pm

Use of Illegal Airports “ERCAN” (TYMBOU)


1. “ERCAN” (TYMBOU) is a closed airport situated in the occupied part of the Republic of Cyprus, which the Government of Cyprus, as the sole legitimate and internationally recognized authority on the island, has declared since 1974 as an illegal point of entry into and exit from the Republic of Cyprus, for the reason of not being able to exercise control over the occupied part of its territory, as a result of the continuing Turkish military occupation. Under International law the Republic of Cyprus is the sole sovereign authority with exclusive jurisdiction to determine which of its airports on its territory are open and functioning, as well as the terms of their operation.

2. It is also important to note that “ERCAN” is located on property belonging to a significant number of Greek Cypriot refugees who were forcibly expelled from their properties by the invasion forces. These refugees still remain the legal owners of their properties and they have never consented for the construction of the airport and its use as such. In that regard reference is made to the cases of Loizidou vs Turkey and Xenides-Arestis vs Turkey in which the European Court of Human Rights held that the applicants remain the legal owners of their property in the occupied areas and that Turkey continues to be in breach of Article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

3. The so-called “ERCAN” airport is not recognized by ICAO, which is the highest international authority on legal issues relating to civil aviation in general. ICAO’s policy on matters relating to Cyprus is in conformity with that of the United Nations and the international community. Consequently, ICAO recognizes only the Republic of Cyprus and its Government as the sole representative of the whole island. It should also be stressed that according to ICAO decisions of 1974, 1975 and 1977, a country not exercising temporarily effective control over its territory by reason of military occupation, does not lose its sovereign rights over such territory and the airspace above it.

4. Furthermore, Turkey, in violation of the Chicago Convention on the International Civil Aviation, the constitutional instrument of ICAO, and its Annexes, to which 188 countries, including the Republic of Cyprus and Turkey, are States-Parties to and following a number of illegal acts after the Turkish invasion, proclaimed the establishment of “Ercan advisory service” which lies in the northern part of Nicosia FIR. The illegal operation of the unrecognized “ERCAN advisory service” causes serious risks over safety, flight efficiency and airspace development in the region and in particular increased workload and inconvenience both for aircrews and Nicosia ACC Controllers and leads to misunderstandings due to the intervention in the provision of Air Traffic Control Services. Ankara ACC should be called upon to adopt standard ICAO procedures and transfer southbound traffic to the contiguous Nicosia control and to take practical steps for the restoration of the voice link between Ankara and Nicosia ACC's.

5. Any possible use by international traffic, of the illegally operating airports, such as “ERCAN” (TYMPOU), violates International law, U.N. Security Council resolutions, E.U. positions and contravenes the ICAO and the EUROCONTROL Conventions, and their respective norms, standards, procedures and recommended practices.
User avatar
EPSILON
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2851
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: ATHENS

Postby DT. » Fri Apr 24, 2009 3:19 pm

removed due to EPsilon's faster mouse.
Last edited by DT. on Fri Apr 24, 2009 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby halil » Fri Apr 24, 2009 3:20 pm

halil
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8804
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: nicosia

Postby EPSILON » Fri Apr 24, 2009 3:20 pm

[quote="DT."]Use of Illegal Airports “ERCAN” (TYMBOU)

removed
Last edited by EPSILON on Fri Apr 24, 2009 3:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
EPSILON
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2851
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: ATHENS

Postby EPSILON » Fri Apr 24, 2009 3:22 pm

halil wrote:http://www.kthy.net/kthyen/index.html


Good but unsave!!!International bodies are not recognize this airline-ALL PASSENGERS ARE TRAVELLING AT THEIR RISK!!!
User avatar
EPSILON
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2851
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: ATHENS

Next

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests