the Anglo-american-canadian plan
can you give us some details of this plan you keep mentioning
Get Real! wrote:The Cypriot wrote:Thanks for your wonderfully dignified post, BOF. My respects to you.
http://www.britishcyprusmemorial.org/in ... hoarethey/
Viewpoint wrote:Didnt the Brits and TCs fight EOKA, only fitting their memorial is in the north with their ally not their enemy.
The Cypriot wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Didnt the Brits and TCs fight EOKA, only fitting their memorial is in the north with their ally not their enemy.
No one likes an arse licker, VP. Especially not the Brits.
Bananiot wrote:Kifeas, I accepted the Annan Plan as the best option under the circumstances. Of course it would have been much better had Papadopoulos negotiated a little bit but this is another story. What the plan catered for and what Christofias accepted is that 50 K settlers will stay after solution. Thus, about 35 000 will cast their vote in elections there after. I consider this to be realistic but if you think that it is possible to repatriate every single settler (even those born here), please tell us how, since you consider yourself to be a realist.
The above is mere detail really. My main argument was that despite getting numerous favourable resolutions, in practice we are asked to make a compromise by the same institutions that have called for Turkey to withdraw her troops and for all the refugees to return to their homes. Furthermore, the rsolutions also speak about a solution that is accepted to both communities. What does this tell you Kifeas? What will we do when the north is inhabited by one million people and we are still asked to negotiate with the other side in order to find a compromise solution? You do understand what compromise is, Kifeas?
In 1978 we came close to solving the issue and at the time there were only 5 000 settlers but the main argument then, by those that rejected the Anglo-american-canadian plan, was the number of settlers that would stay. It is nice to use the patriotic jargon (especially when it does not cost anything) but those who objected to Makarios's long-term struggle policy, were quickly branded traitors and were sidelined or forced to go along with him.
Now, things are very difficult of course and frustration causes people to become very weird. Take yourself for example. Only a year ago you told us that the only solution is partition which we should negotiate and get the best we can. Some coastline, some land and a partition along the 80% to 20% would have made you very happy, you said. Just as a matter of interest, are you still thinking like this, especially after the rise of Eroglu?
Viewpoint wrote:The Cypriot wrote:No one likes an arse licker, VP. Especially not the Brits.
Whats arse licking about dieing together?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests