David Carter wrote:Dear Oracle
Let's take your points one at a time.
(1) To the best of my knowledge, my book, The Cyprus Tapes, was not sponsored by any one. If it was, then I did not know about it. The book itself explains why it came to be written and who suggested the idea in the first place. That person was the late Nancy Crawshaw, the author of The Cyprus Revolt, a book, I'm told has the respect of Greek and Turkish Cypriots alike.
(2) I repeat I am not involved with the current memorial project. I lobbied for 'a memorial' back in 2000 or thereabouts. I will not apologize or take responsibility for the actions of others.
(3) The choice of location is because those to be named on the memorial died in Cyprus. It is a tradition of the British Army - note there are British military cemeteries in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Gallipoli, Germany, France, Holland, Belgium et al. Some of these date back to the 19th century.
(4) Since when is land owned by the British in the North going back before the creation of the Republic of Cyprus and the events of 1974 become 'disputed'? If you are suggesting that British property can suddenly be taken over at whim of a Greek Cypriot like yourself, I suggest you are marching to a different tune to most of your countrymen. By the way, where do you live today?
(5) If the UK Government is not involved with the project, what's your beef about individual Members of Parliament and retired senior military officers from giving their private support? Just as I hope you are citizen with freedom to act as you see fit, within the law, why can't they? Just because you disagree with them, it's a tad arrogant to question their rights to act according to their conscience.
I know I may be causing you and others offense, but I must ask how you define 'terrorist' and 'terrorism'?
I choose my words carefully and hope the reader will read them carefully, too, understanding I speak only for myself and nobody else.
All the best
David - still retired, still relaxed.
Dear Mr. Carter,
If the government of the Republic of Cyprus has agreed to the siting of a memorial then that is one thing. If it has expressed its dissatisfaction with such a proposal then to over-ride its wishes and actively lobby for such a memorial in an area of its territory currently under occupation is insensitive to say the least. It makes no difference if the site under proposal is "sovereign British territory". The British are guests in Cyprus and the legacy of British involvement in recent Cypriot history is a hot issue and the cause of much ill-feeling. You do well to consider the sensitivities of the Cypriots in this matter. To dismiss the considered will of the sovereign government of the Republic of Cyprus will do nothing to ease the suspicion that British attitudes towards Cyprus have changed little in the intervening years.