Cyprus-Forum.com

[Oracle]

A challenge I relish, but you've posted nothing but an unfounded conspiracy theory, with no evidence.

which unfounded conspiracy theory have I posted?

OK ... Do you want to move into the realms of "memes" ... because I made a pact with myself not to waste my time trying to discuss them on the forum. You have something to say about memes ... let me hear it!

You're an authority in stereotyping

I say, 'statistically', evolution can't take place only at a single selected individual, provided there is more than one individual at a given time, facing the exact circumstances.

And I add, if you claim it did, you have to come up with the evidence that belongs to the same era, from other sites, or with the evidence to support the so_called migration - do you read this one?

There I was feeding you all that information to pay for some reward of a nugget of something NEW and you give me NOTHING in return!

I'm challenging the hypothesis you defend. Until you have a widely accepted theory, stop distributing creationist b.s.

Aaaahh ... Here we go again! Another person who has read those fine books and thinks he understands Evolution

So I deduct, you've personally evolved in order to understand evolution Although clearly I suspect that from the way you behave...

OK ... I am now 100% sure you do not have a clue about genetics/evolution!

If you think I was promoting Creationism, then you're so intent on appearing "knowledgeable" in this field of anti-creationism (it is in vogue, after all) that you are unable to assimilate the science which provides the evidence for Evolution ...

It's not enough to simply accept a theory, you have to know why it is sound/otherwise. As I said, I came to my own conclusions/re-affirmation about the soundness of Evolution and not because I was unable to weigh up the pros and cons and simply accepted what was fashionable at the time.

Now, I don't expect you to re-invent the wheel, but equally I do not want to waste my time on someone who is so unable to draw meaningful conclusions, because he cannot juggle evidence, since he would rather believe what is fashionable without question such as Evolution ... (even though it happens to be correct) than critically evaluate just why the Theory of Evolution is so STRONG!

Unlike you, I know enough to accept the Theory of Evolution as true, because I have evaluated the evidence, and tested a few things myself ... It's why it does not bother me that the 'Out of Africa' hypothesis has been sabotaged by the "Creationist" camp .... there are many, many pieces of evidence to trash Creationism. And distorting some scientific evidence, or being selective about it because it does not fit in with the White Supremacists' views of themselves, is not something I would endorse.

You can't have it both ways coremax ... pretending you accept the Theory of Evolution and then complain when it comes up with something which you don't like .. such as the 'Out of Africa' evidence. It's similar to the moans Darwin faced when people had to accept they evolved along the same branch as Chimps ..... Get used to our 'dirty' roots! The Out of Africa hypothesis is sound, not because it 'coincidentally' fits in with a molded biblical account, but because it has a weight of indisputable evidence to back it up ... and it fits perfectly with the Theory of Evolution also (coincidentally ).