The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Gul: NATO row criticism is dangerous

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Gul: NATO row criticism is dangerous

Postby RAFAELLA » Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:29 am

Turkey's Gul says NATO row criticism is dangerous

LONDON, April 8 (Reuters) - Turkish President Abdullah Gul said criticism of his country over its objections to the appointment of NATO's new chief was dangerous, in an interview published in Thursday's Financial Times.

Turkey had put itself at odds with its European allies after threatening to veto Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen as NATO head because of his handling of a 2006 crisis over cartoons of the Prophet Mohammad in a Danish newspaper.

France and Germany had strongly backed Rasmussen and the FT said Olli Rehn, European Union enlargement commissioner, and Bernard Kouchner, French foreign minister, had criticised Turkey's brinkmanship.

Turkey, a EU candidate, only backed down after U.S. President Barack Obama offered promises one of Rasmussen's deputies would be a Turk.

Gul said the criticism worried him. "It's very dangerous and it's making us disturbed," he said.

"We neither engaged in blackmail nor did we have an irrational request. We acted in a rational logical and in a modern way within the compromise which is a European culture .

"And indeed in the end we came to an understanding. Therefore I am surprised to see comments of that nature coming from certain countries. I don't find it terribly in line with the European spirit
."


Turkey's objections to Rasmussen had threatened the image of unity NATO had sought to present at the military alliance's 60th anniversary summit. (Reporting by Tim Castle; Editing by Matthew Jones)
http://www.kyivpost.com/world/39230

Image

:shock: Turks never stop to amaze you ...rational logical, modern way, compromise, European culture, European spirit.
They are still candidates and they behave like this, if they ever became members how would they behave?
User avatar
RAFAELLA
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 750
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 4:17 pm
Location: Refugee from Famagusta - Turkish invasion '74

Postby paliometoxo » Thu Apr 09, 2009 12:18 pm

exactly the same if not worse... just with memebership they would have the power to do something about it... imagine in their term in eu presidency what they would do, they would destroy eu in a term.
User avatar
paliometoxo
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8837
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 3:55 pm
Location: Nicosia, paliometocho

Postby RAFAELLA » Thu Apr 09, 2009 2:54 pm

paliometoxo wrote:exactly the same if not worse... just with memebership they would have the power to do something about it... imagine in their term in eu presidency what they would do, they would destroy eu in a term.


The good thing is that they do not have the ability to hide their true colours. Slowly slowly the EU will understand with whom they are dealing with and this is the good part.
User avatar
RAFAELLA
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 750
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 4:17 pm
Location: Refugee from Famagusta - Turkish invasion '74

Postby paliometoxo » Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:14 pm

yes Rafaella they will just like their neighbouring countries can see how they really are in their actions and how they behave. turkeyu just keeps giving more reasons not to allow them in eu
User avatar
paliometoxo
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8837
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 3:55 pm
Location: Nicosia, paliometocho


Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests