DT. wrote:observer wrote:Nikitas wrote:"and there are a whole lot of new Balkan states where people have not got theirs back either, all of which have been recognised by most of the world. "
Obviously inaccurate statement! Except for Kossovo where the property issue is under review, can you name ONE Balkan state where there has been losso of property for individual owners?
Actually, I can name 4 quite easily, and not just my view, but that of the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre:
Bosnia & Herzegovina – over 78,000 refugees originating from Bosnia & Herzegovina as of June 2008.
http://www.internal-displacement.org/80 ... pCountries)/C8DEEFACFF6821AD802570A7004C6A42?OpenDocument
Croatia – over 100,000 refugees originating from Croatia as of June 2008.
http://www.internal-displacement.org/80 ... pCountries)/7928D486A14C897D802570A7004C7215?OpenDocument
Macedonia – over 8,000 refugees originating from Macedonia as of June 2008
http://www.internal-displacement.org/80 ... pCountries)/64A4EC2CB5C0F210802570A7004C8BD8?OpenDocument
Serbia - over 165,000 refugees originating from Serbia as of June 2008
http://www.internal-displacement.org/80 ... pCountries)/A6A36317DA8D29A1802570A7004CAB90?OpenDocument
The pages give additional information as to why people are still refugees, principally property and ethnic discrimination.
SO basically what you guys are saying is that, the Serbs and Croats massacred and cleansed all these people from Bosnia so the Turks should also get away with it when they did it to the GC's?
You have become quite an expert at taking things out of context and arriving at conclusions that suits your argument.
All the above does is shows that Nikitas’s argument is not correct which what it intended to do.
What it also says is that there is alternative solutions rather than just everyone back to their homes which is pissing in the wind.
