miltiades wrote:Where have you been since Jan 2006 ?
Probably working for the Cyprus Mail? Sounds like this guy:
http://www.cyprus-mail.com/news/main.ph ... 9&cat_id=1
Take a look how clueless some people from the Cyprus Mail are....and i am starting to see a pattern here from you silly British Cyps.
The author states:
- Code: Select all
They should have made the English language obligatory for everyone from 1878;
What a clueless twit. Why would you impose this on the local population? Here is why:
I was born in London of Greek Cypriot parents and returned to live in Cyprus five years ago.
You havent a clue about Cyprus. Go back, just go back.
Some of you (not all) British Cypriots keep screaming about uniqueness and in the same breathe have the audacity to drivel on about recreating Cyprus in Britain's image.
Now here, on the other hand, is a wonderful article that explains a lot about why some Brits think the way they do on Cyprus:
The nature of those involved with the Friends of Cyprus is revealed if we consider the career of Stephen Twigg, formerly Labour MP for Enfield, a marginal constituency in North London with a large Greek Cypriot population. As an MP, Twigg was an outspoken supporter of Cyprus; but when he lost his seat in 2005 he became director of the Foreign Policy Centre, a Blairite think tank, whose most high-profile intervention so far has been its ‘Turkey belongs in Europe’ campaign, which strongly advocates Turkey’s membership of the EU. Indeed, when the FPC launched its Turkey in Europe pamphlet last year, Twigg did the rounds of TV news studios and so on strongly promoting Turkey and its EU bid. From supporter of Cyprus to cheerleader for Turkey. So much for the Friends of Cyprus.
2. Since landing on Cyprus in 1878, the British strategy has been to dehellenise the island in order to control it better. The English wanted to create another Malta and a population that looked towards London, not Athens. Britain’s aim during the colonial period was to foster among Cypriots (though not the Muslim minority, who were encouraged to feel Turkish) an exclusively Cypriot identity stripped of its Hellenic essence and to persuade Cypriots ‘of the moral and material benefits of the Commonwealth connection’ and contrast this to the political and economic disadvantages of union with Greece.
To retain its influence and interests in Cyprus, the British continue to support the dehellenisation of the island.
3. Allies, whether they like it or not, of British dehellenisation of Cyprus are the Cypriot communists, who've always believed that the Cyprus problem is one of alien and externally-imposed nationalisms and that a peaceful Cyprus is one in which Greek and Turkish Cypriots reject the identities and influence from their mother countries in order to construct a common Cypriot identity.
Communists in Cyprus would remove anything symbolising Greece from the island – national flag, anthem, holidays – and construct a history of the island that stresses the common struggles of the Greek and Turkish Cypriots – such as the resistance of peasants to high taxation under the Ottomans. The communists believe the Cypriot dialect is a national language in its own right, separate to Greek; and that even if Cypriots do share certain cultural characteristics with Helladic Greeks, this is no more significant than the shared cultural characteristics between Britons and Australians.
Browse for the full article here....
http://hellenicantidote.blogspot.com/