The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


TALAT DEMANDS A MORE ACTIVE ROLE FROM BAN (United Nations)

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Lit » Sat Apr 04, 2009 12:57 am

Viewpoint wrote:
Lit wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:Well done President Talat, the UN shoudl play a more active role rather than the onlooker position the GC side has reduced them to...of course they didnt get what they wanted so they cut that intermediary out, then they have the nerve to support their resolutions, Kikapu admitted that they can back and produce undemocratic and inhuman resolutions/decisions/plans. GCs rejected the AP and we rejected biased one sided resolutions.


It was our democratic right to reject the AP. Its not the same as violating UN resolutions you bone head.

Arent you the one who supports an independent "TRNC"? You never backpedaled from that position. Ever.

And your for an active role by the UN ehh? Ohh, gee, i wonder why?

Furk off.


Didnt the UN produce and back both the resolutions and AP? You seem to want to pick and choose what suits you.


What are you talking about? Idiot, was it our democratic right to reject the AP plan.......yes or no?

Why did we have the referendum? Was it all a show? Come on, go whine about your so called securities to some one who cares.
Lit
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2293
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:32 am
Location: Right behind ya

Postby Viewpoint » Sat Apr 04, 2009 1:02 am

Lit wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
Lit wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:Well done President Talat, the UN shoudl play a more active role rather than the onlooker position the GC side has reduced them to...of course they didnt get what they wanted so they cut that intermediary out, then they have the nerve to support their resolutions, Kikapu admitted that they can back and produce undemocratic and inhuman resolutions/decisions/plans. GCs rejected the AP and we rejected biased one sided resolutions.


It was our democratic right to reject the AP. Its not the same as violating UN resolutions you bone head.

Arent you the one who supports an independent "TRNC"? You never backpedaled from that position. Ever.

And your for an active role by the UN ehh? Ohh, gee, i wonder why?

Furk off.


Didnt the UN produce and back both the resolutions and AP? You seem to want to pick and choose what suits you.


What are you talking about? Idiot, was it our democratic right to reject the AP plan.......yes or no?

Why did we have the referendum? Was it all a show? Come on, go whine about your so called securities to some one who cares.


Please try and be a bit more civil I to can resort to insults, YES you had the right to vote but you lost the only opportunity you had to get rid of the Turkish Army, Settlers, Land return, Unify Cyprus and share power but of course these are not things that you wanted enough to take that step.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby boomerang » Sat Apr 04, 2009 1:03 am

Turkish Cypriots want a bi-zonal and bi-communal federation set up by two founder states that had equal status and two nations who would enjoy political equality, Talat added. "This is federation, not confederation," he was quoted as saying by the agency.


http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/english/world/11229147.asp?gid=244


Wet dreams...again :lol:

Image
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

Postby Lit » Sat Apr 04, 2009 1:11 am

Viewpoint wrote:
Lit wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
Lit wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:Well done President Talat, the UN shoudl play a more active role rather than the onlooker position the GC side has reduced them to...of course they didnt get what they wanted so they cut that intermediary out, then they have the nerve to support their resolutions, Kikapu admitted that they can back and produce undemocratic and inhuman resolutions/decisions/plans. GCs rejected the AP and we rejected biased one sided resolutions.


It was our democratic right to reject the AP. Its not the same as violating UN resolutions you bone head.

Arent you the one who supports an independent "TRNC"? You never backpedaled from that position. Ever.

And your for an active role by the UN ehh? Ohh, gee, i wonder why?

Furk off.


Didnt the UN produce and back both the resolutions and AP? You seem to want to pick and choose what suits you.


What are you talking about? Idiot, was it our democratic right to reject the AP plan.......yes or no?

Why did we have the referendum? Was it all a show? Come on, go whine about your so called securities to some one who cares.


Please try and be a bit more civil I to can resort to insults, YES you had the right to vote but you lost the only opportunity you had to get rid of the Turkish Army, Settlers, Land return, Unify Cyprus and share power but of course these are not things that you wanted enough to take that step.


I am sorry for my rudeness but i feel like the GCs have been lectured enough from the likes of you. No need to explain to me what the AP offered. The fact that a known partitionist such as yourself endorses it speaks volumes.

So, it was our right to reject the AP plan and its NOT the same as violating UN resolutions. Thank you. That was the only point i was trying to make.

Signing off.
Lit
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2293
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:32 am
Location: Right behind ya

Postby wyoming cowboy » Sat Apr 04, 2009 2:52 am

what a bunch bullshit the annan plan was a gimmick to get the Turks out of the doghouse. reject or not your hear the Gc rejected a peace plan...Noone who is free and used to living in a democracy would accept the annan plan, the tc who were living under denktash and the occupation army took it because of 3 decades of turkish oppression..
User avatar
wyoming cowboy
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1756
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:15 am

Postby Piratis » Sat Apr 04, 2009 6:24 am

DT is right. Issuing a UN resolutions is almost the most active thing the UN can do. The only thing that is more active than that is to implement their resolutions by force when countries like Turkey refuse to obey them. Is this what they Turks want?
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby Viewpoint » Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:10 pm

Lit wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
Lit wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
Lit wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:Well done President Talat, the UN shoudl play a more active role rather than the onlooker position the GC side has reduced them to...of course they didnt get what they wanted so they cut that intermediary out, then they have the nerve to support their resolutions, Kikapu admitted that they can back and produce undemocratic and inhuman resolutions/decisions/plans. GCs rejected the AP and we rejected biased one sided resolutions.


It was our democratic right to reject the AP. Its not the same as violating UN resolutions you bone head.

Arent you the one who supports an independent "TRNC"? You never backpedaled from that position. Ever.

And your for an active role by the UN ehh? Ohh, gee, i wonder why?

Furk off.


Didnt the UN produce and back both the resolutions and AP? You seem to want to pick and choose what suits you.


What are you talking about? Idiot, was it our democratic right to reject the AP plan.......yes or no?

Why did we have the referendum? Was it all a show? Come on, go whine about your so called securities to some one who cares.


Please try and be a bit more civil I to can resort to insults, YES you had the right to vote but you lost the only opportunity you had to get rid of the Turkish Army, Settlers, Land return, Unify Cyprus and share power but of course these are not things that you wanted enough to take that step.


I am sorry for my rudeness but i feel like the GCs have been lectured enough from the likes of you. No need to explain to me what the AP offered. The fact that a known partitionist such as yourself endorses it speaks volumes.

So, it was our right to reject the AP plan and its NOT the same as violating UN resolutions. Thank you. That was the only point i was trying to make.

Signing off.


Thank you for being more civilized with your response.

You are contradicting yourself as you appear to pick and choose what suıts you not that you trust what the UN put forward but because it supports your demands. The plan was their take on how a solution could be achieved as it did not suit your goal you rejected it but we will not apologise for accepting something that suits us and we always strive to get as many of our demands met just as you do for your own sideç
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby Viewpoint » Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:13 pm

Piratis wrote:DT is right. Issuing a UN resolutions is almost the most active thing the UN can do. The only thing that is more active than that is to implement their resolutions by force when countries like Turkey refuse to obey them. Is this what they Turks want?


Feel free to try but isnt 35 years enough evidence that the UN would never take such a step, or they would have done so many years ago.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Previous

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests