paliometoxo wrote:AWE wrote:yeah and it all started in 1974 as per the RoC PIO!
nooo way before 1974, it started whent he turks came to cyprus killing thousands of gcs and catholics, over 20,000 for what excuse do they have for that one?
vaughanwilliams wrote:It is quite true. There is no immigration from Anatolia to TRNC. There was, but there isn't any anymore. Mainland Turks need work and/or residency permits when they arrive and when these expire they must leave.
denizaksulu wrote:paliometoxo wrote:AWE wrote:yeah and it all started in 1974 as per the RoC PIO!
nooo way before 1974, it started whent he turks came to cyprus killing thousands of gcs and catholics, over 20,000 for what excuse do they have for that one?
To save you from the Papists and Selim II loved Cypiot wine.
OK?
AWE wrote:paliometoxo wrote:AWE wrote:yeah and it all started in 1974 as per the RoC PIO!
nooo way before 1974, it started whent he turks came to cyprus killing thousands of gcs and catholics, over 20,000 for what excuse do they have for that one?
My point being that if it is OK for the RoC PIO to deny the pain suffered by the TCs 63-74 then it is OK for Gul to tell an untruth as was originally claimed.
Imagine if the UK did not teach about the Highland clearances or what Cromwell did in Ireland? or the US not talk about slavery, Aus and Aborigines etc etc
There needs to be a less bias version of Cyprus history if the RoC want to convince 18% or so of it's population to trust it!
paliometoxo wrote:AWE wrote:paliometoxo wrote:AWE wrote:yeah and it all started in 1974 as per the RoC PIO!
nooo way before 1974, it started whent he turks came to cyprus killing thousands of gcs and catholics, over 20,000 for what excuse do they have for that one?
My point being that if it is OK for the RoC PIO to deny the pain suffered by the TCs 63-74 then it is OK for Gul to tell an untruth as was originally claimed.
Imagine if the UK did not teach about the Highland clearances or what Cromwell did in Ireland? or the US not talk about slavery, Aus and Aborigines etc etc
There needs to be a less bias version of Cyprus history if the RoC want to convince 18% or so of it's population to trust it!
he also said if we accepted annan plan there would be no troops left in cyprus turkish ones,, lie because the anan plan said they would have 650 left over, they like to use the anan as an excuse a plan that was totally turkish taylored.
denizaksulu wrote:paliometoxo wrote:AWE wrote:paliometoxo wrote:AWE wrote:yeah and it all started in 1974 as per the RoC PIO!
nooo way before 1974, it started whent he turks came to cyprus killing thousands of gcs and catholics, over 20,000 for what excuse do they have for that one?
My point being that if it is OK for the RoC PIO to deny the pain suffered by the TCs 63-74 then it is OK for Gul to tell an untruth as was originally claimed.
Imagine if the UK did not teach about the Highland clearances or what Cromwell did in Ireland? or the US not talk about slavery, Aus and Aborigines etc etc
There needs to be a less bias version of Cyprus history if the RoC want to convince 18% or so of it's population to trust it!
he also said if we accepted annan plan there would be no troops left in cyprus turkish ones,, lie because the anan plan said they would have 650 left over, they like to use the anan as an excuse a plan that was totally turkish taylored.
Turkish tailored!!....yet they cant even get into Europe, yet.
YFred wrote:denizaksulu wrote:paliometoxo wrote:AWE wrote:paliometoxo wrote:AWE wrote:yeah and it all started in 1974 as per the RoC PIO!
nooo way before 1974, it started whent he turks came to cyprus killing thousands of gcs and catholics, over 20,000 for what excuse do they have for that one?
My point being that if it is OK for the RoC PIO to deny the pain suffered by the TCs 63-74 then it is OK for Gul to tell an untruth as was originally claimed.
Imagine if the UK did not teach about the Highland clearances or what Cromwell did in Ireland? or the US not talk about slavery, Aus and Aborigines etc etc
There needs to be a less bias version of Cyprus history if the RoC want to convince 18% or so of it's population to trust it!
he also said if we accepted annan plan there would be no troops left in cyprus turkish ones,, lie because the anan plan said they would have 650 left over, they like to use the anan as an excuse a plan that was totally turkish taylored.
Turkish tailored!!....yet they cant even get into Europe, yet.
Deniz, are you insinuating that EU puts Turkey before Cyprus. You must wash your mouth with soap young man! Next time its double oruc for you for this sin alone.
denizaksulu wrote:YFred wrote:denizaksulu wrote:paliometoxo wrote:AWE wrote:paliometoxo wrote:AWE wrote:yeah and it all started in 1974 as per the RoC PIO!
nooo way before 1974, it started whent he turks came to cyprus killing thousands of gcs and catholics, over 20,000 for what excuse do they have for that one?
My point being that if it is OK for the RoC PIO to deny the pain suffered by the TCs 63-74 then it is OK for Gul to tell an untruth as was originally claimed.
Imagine if the UK did not teach about the Highland clearances or what Cromwell did in Ireland? or the US not talk about slavery, Aus and Aborigines etc etc
There needs to be a less bias version of Cyprus history if the RoC want to convince 18% or so of it's population to trust it!
he also said if we accepted annan plan there would be no troops left in cyprus turkish ones,, lie because the anan plan said they would have 650 left over, they like to use the anan as an excuse a plan that was totally turkish taylored.
Turkish tailored!!....yet they cant even get into Europe, yet.
Deniz, are you insinuating that EU puts Turkey before Cyprus. You must wash your mouth with soap young man! Next time its double oruc for you for this sin alone.
I could do with a 'tripple' oruç, never mind a double.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests