The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


interview with erdogan on euronews

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby paliometoxo » Tue Mar 31, 2009 2:23 pm

they wouldent have withdrawn there would of been 650 of the f ers left
User avatar
paliometoxo
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8837
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 3:55 pm
Location: Nicosia, paliometocho

Postby vaughanwilliams » Tue Mar 31, 2009 2:50 pm

It is quite true. There is no immigration from Anatolia to TRNC. There was, but there isn't any anymore. Mainland Turks need work and/or residency permits when they arrive and when these expire they must leave.
User avatar
vaughanwilliams
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1331
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:54 pm

Postby AWE » Tue Mar 31, 2009 2:59 pm

paliometoxo wrote:
AWE wrote:yeah and it all started in 1974 as per the RoC PIO!



nooo way before 1974, it started whent he turks came to cyprus killing thousands of gcs and catholics, over 20,000 for what excuse do they have for that one?


My point being that if it is OK for the RoC PIO to deny the pain suffered by the TCs 63-74 then it is OK for Gul to tell an untruth as was originally claimed.

Imagine if the UK did not teach about the Highland clearances or what Cromwell did in Ireland? or the US not talk about slavery, Aus and Aborigines etc etc

There needs to be a less bias version of Cyprus history if the RoC want to convince 18% or so of it's population to trust it!
User avatar
AWE
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 569
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:50 pm
Location: Can't say - GPS has died!

Postby wallace » Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:00 pm

vaughanwilliams wrote:It is quite true. There is no immigration from Anatolia to TRNC. There was, but there isn't any anymore. Mainland Turks need work and/or residency permits when they arrive and when these expire they must leave.


Really???? How many settlers are there in the occupied area?
User avatar
wallace
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:52 am
Location: Far Away

Postby paliometoxo » Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:10 pm

denizaksulu wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:
AWE wrote:yeah and it all started in 1974 as per the RoC PIO!



nooo way before 1974, it started whent he turks came to cyprus killing thousands of gcs and catholics, over 20,000 for what excuse do they have for that one?



To save you from the Papists and Selim II loved Cypiot wine. :lol: :lol:


OK?


hehe i like that one.. i am comign to save you by killing 20,000 of you look at us saving youuu DIEEE DIEEE guns fired killing stabbing hjowever they murderd them... we are saving you damn it.. LOL

is that how turks save people by killing them off?:P
User avatar
paliometoxo
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8837
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 3:55 pm
Location: Nicosia, paliometocho

Postby paliometoxo » Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:13 pm

AWE wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:
AWE wrote:yeah and it all started in 1974 as per the RoC PIO!



nooo way before 1974, it started whent he turks came to cyprus killing thousands of gcs and catholics, over 20,000 for what excuse do they have for that one?


My point being that if it is OK for the RoC PIO to deny the pain suffered by the TCs 63-74 then it is OK for Gul to tell an untruth as was originally claimed.

Imagine if the UK did not teach about the Highland clearances or what Cromwell did in Ireland? or the US not talk about slavery, Aus and Aborigines etc etc

There needs to be a less bias version of Cyprus history if the RoC want to convince 18% or so of it's population to trust it!


he also said if we accepted annan plan there would be no troops left in cyprus turkish ones,, lie because the anan plan said they would have 650 left over, they like to use the anan as an excuse a plan that was totally turkish taylored.
User avatar
paliometoxo
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8837
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 3:55 pm
Location: Nicosia, paliometocho

Postby denizaksulu » Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:17 pm

paliometoxo wrote:
AWE wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:
AWE wrote:yeah and it all started in 1974 as per the RoC PIO!



nooo way before 1974, it started whent he turks came to cyprus killing thousands of gcs and catholics, over 20,000 for what excuse do they have for that one?


My point being that if it is OK for the RoC PIO to deny the pain suffered by the TCs 63-74 then it is OK for Gul to tell an untruth as was originally claimed.

Imagine if the UK did not teach about the Highland clearances or what Cromwell did in Ireland? or the US not talk about slavery, Aus and Aborigines etc etc

There needs to be a less bias version of Cyprus history if the RoC want to convince 18% or so of it's population to trust it!


he also said if we accepted annan plan there would be no troops left in cyprus turkish ones,, lie because the anan plan said they would have 650 left over, they like to use the anan as an excuse a plan that was totally turkish taylored.




Turkish tailored!!....yet they cant even get into Europe, yet.
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby YFred » Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:32 pm

denizaksulu wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:
AWE wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:
AWE wrote:yeah and it all started in 1974 as per the RoC PIO!



nooo way before 1974, it started whent he turks came to cyprus killing thousands of gcs and catholics, over 20,000 for what excuse do they have for that one?


My point being that if it is OK for the RoC PIO to deny the pain suffered by the TCs 63-74 then it is OK for Gul to tell an untruth as was originally claimed.

Imagine if the UK did not teach about the Highland clearances or what Cromwell did in Ireland? or the US not talk about slavery, Aus and Aborigines etc etc

There needs to be a less bias version of Cyprus history if the RoC want to convince 18% or so of it's population to trust it!


he also said if we accepted annan plan there would be no troops left in cyprus turkish ones,, lie because the anan plan said they would have 650 left over, they like to use the anan as an excuse a plan that was totally turkish taylored.




Turkish tailored!!....yet they cant even get into Europe, yet.

Deniz, are you insinuating that EU puts Turkey before Cyprus. You must wash your mouth with soap young man! Next time its double oruc for you for this sin alone. :lol: :lol:
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby denizaksulu » Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:37 pm

YFred wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:
AWE wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:
AWE wrote:yeah and it all started in 1974 as per the RoC PIO!



nooo way before 1974, it started whent he turks came to cyprus killing thousands of gcs and catholics, over 20,000 for what excuse do they have for that one?


My point being that if it is OK for the RoC PIO to deny the pain suffered by the TCs 63-74 then it is OK for Gul to tell an untruth as was originally claimed.

Imagine if the UK did not teach about the Highland clearances or what Cromwell did in Ireland? or the US not talk about slavery, Aus and Aborigines etc etc

There needs to be a less bias version of Cyprus history if the RoC want to convince 18% or so of it's population to trust it!


he also said if we accepted annan plan there would be no troops left in cyprus turkish ones,, lie because the anan plan said they would have 650 left over, they like to use the anan as an excuse a plan that was totally turkish taylored.




Turkish tailored!!....yet they cant even get into Europe, yet.

Deniz, are you insinuating that EU puts Turkey before Cyprus. You must wash your mouth with soap young man! Next time its double oruc for you for this sin alone. :lol: :lol:



I could do with a 'tripple' oruç, never mind a double. :lol:
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby YFred » Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:41 pm

denizaksulu wrote:
YFred wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:
AWE wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:
AWE wrote:yeah and it all started in 1974 as per the RoC PIO!



nooo way before 1974, it started whent he turks came to cyprus killing thousands of gcs and catholics, over 20,000 for what excuse do they have for that one?


My point being that if it is OK for the RoC PIO to deny the pain suffered by the TCs 63-74 then it is OK for Gul to tell an untruth as was originally claimed.

Imagine if the UK did not teach about the Highland clearances or what Cromwell did in Ireland? or the US not talk about slavery, Aus and Aborigines etc etc

There needs to be a less bias version of Cyprus history if the RoC want to convince 18% or so of it's population to trust it!


he also said if we accepted annan plan there would be no troops left in cyprus turkish ones,, lie because the anan plan said they would have 650 left over, they like to use the anan as an excuse a plan that was totally turkish taylored.




Turkish tailored!!....yet they cant even get into Europe, yet.

Deniz, are you insinuating that EU puts Turkey before Cyprus. You must wash your mouth with soap young man! Next time its double oruc for you for this sin alone. :lol: :lol:



I could do with a 'tripple' oruç, never mind a double. :lol:

Deniz, you can't lose weight by oruc. It has to be a proper non-sea food diet. When you see it, just don't eat it. Lots of Carrot and Celery for you.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests