The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


take a third of the island but make it quick.

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Simon » Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:15 pm

Paphitis wrote:
B25 wrote:Paphiti, I respect many of the things you say, but I think you are the one being naive here if you believe for one minute that the US does not control NATO and the UN.

They are both there to print a 007 licence to kill for the US as it sees fit.

please tell me the difference between resolution 1441 against Iraq (that the US used as an excuse to attack) and the many resolutions against Turkey over Cyprus that they did nothing about?

There is your proof. Einai fos fanari, teleios kelptsia.


No I think you are being very naive for believing in America's absolute power within NATO and the UN, because you are basically saying that other countries such as UK, France, Germany, Canada etc etc have no say. There are at least 2 other superpower nations within NATO, and one thing is for sure, they are not there to simply just make up the numbers or be US subjects!

I am well aware that many Cypriots actually believe that NATO and US are synonymous, but that is simply not the case!


Paphitis, I would be interested to hear who you think the two other superpowers in NATO are?
User avatar
Simon
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1955
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 5:47 pm

Postby Paphitis » Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:19 pm

Simon wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
B25 wrote:Paphiti, I respect many of the things you say, but I think you are the one being naive here if you believe for one minute that the US does not control NATO and the UN.

They are both there to print a 007 licence to kill for the US as it sees fit.

please tell me the difference between resolution 1441 against Iraq (that the US used as an excuse to attack) and the many resolutions against Turkey over Cyprus that they did nothing about?

There is your proof. Einai fos fanari, teleios kelptsia.


No I think you are being very naive for believing in America's absolute power within NATO and the UN, because you are basically saying that other countries such as UK, France, Germany, Canada etc etc have no say. There are at least 2 other superpower nations within NATO, and one thing is for sure, they are not there to simply just make up the numbers or be US subjects!

I am well aware that many Cypriots actually believe that NATO and US are synonymous, but that is simply not the case!


Paphitis, I would be interested to hear who you think the two other superpowers in NATO are?


France and Germany! :lol:
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby Paphitis » Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:22 pm

Simon wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
B25 wrote:Paphiti, I respect many of the things you say, but I think you are the one being naive here if you believe for one minute that the US does not control NATO and the UN.

They are both there to print a 007 licence to kill for the US as it sees fit.

please tell me the difference between resolution 1441 against Iraq (that the US used as an excuse to attack) and the many resolutions against Turkey over Cyprus that they did nothing about?

There is your proof. Einai fos fanari, teleios kelptsia.


No I think you are being very naive for believing in America's absolute power within NATO and the UN, because you are basically saying that other countries such as UK, France, Germany, Canada etc etc have no say. There are at least 2 other superpower nations within NATO, and one thing is for sure, they are not there to simply just make up the numbers or be US subjects!

I am well aware that many Cypriots actually believe that NATO and US are synonymous, but that is simply not the case!


Paphitis, I would be interested to hear who you think the two other superpowers in NATO are?


BTW, don't think I have let you off the hook, because every single time you incompetent bozos get yourselves into a pickle, it is up to Australia and Canada to save your sorry arses... :lol:
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby Simon » Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:26 pm

Paphitis wrote:
Simon wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
B25 wrote:Paphiti, I respect many of the things you say, but I think you are the one being naive here if you believe for one minute that the US does not control NATO and the UN.

They are both there to print a 007 licence to kill for the US as it sees fit.

please tell me the difference between resolution 1441 against Iraq (that the US used as an excuse to attack) and the many resolutions against Turkey over Cyprus that they did nothing about?

There is your proof. Einai fos fanari, teleios kelptsia.


No I think you are being very naive for believing in America's absolute power within NATO and the UN, because you are basically saying that other countries such as UK, France, Germany, Canada etc etc have no say. There are at least 2 other superpower nations within NATO, and one thing is for sure, they are not there to simply just make up the numbers or be US subjects!

I am well aware that many Cypriots actually believe that NATO and US are synonymous, but that is simply not the case!


Paphitis, I would be interested to hear who you think the two other superpowers in NATO are?


France and Germany! :lol:


I thought so! :lol:

Let it be known that Paphitis regards Britain as a superpower, despite his earlier posts to me! :lol:
User avatar
Simon
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1955
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 5:47 pm

Postby Simon » Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:26 pm

Paphitis wrote:
Simon wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
B25 wrote:Paphiti, I respect many of the things you say, but I think you are the one being naive here if you believe for one minute that the US does not control NATO and the UN.

They are both there to print a 007 licence to kill for the US as it sees fit.

please tell me the difference between resolution 1441 against Iraq (that the US used as an excuse to attack) and the many resolutions against Turkey over Cyprus that they did nothing about?

There is your proof. Einai fos fanari, teleios kelptsia.


No I think you are being very naive for believing in America's absolute power within NATO and the UN, because you are basically saying that other countries such as UK, France, Germany, Canada etc etc have no say. There are at least 2 other superpower nations within NATO, and one thing is for sure, they are not there to simply just make up the numbers or be US subjects!

I am well aware that many Cypriots actually believe that NATO and US are synonymous, but that is simply not the case!


Paphitis, I would be interested to hear who you think the two other superpowers in NATO are?


BTW, don't think I have let you off the hook, because every single time you incompetent bozos get yourselves into a pickle, it is up to Australia and Canada to save your sorry arses... :lol:


I know you love us really! :lol:
User avatar
Simon
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1955
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 5:47 pm

Postby insan » Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:29 pm

insan wrote:
Marked "Secret UK Eyes A'" and entitled Re-instatement of President Makarios in Cyprus by means of British military support, the document warns of the dangers involved in such an operation.

"This paper considers the general forces level necessary to achieve this," it begins. "It does not address itself to the possibility [of intervention] by Greece, Turkey or another nation ... However, the attempted intervention by air or sea of Greek forces could be deterred by our own forces given about 10 days notice.

"The threat will not only consist of the Cyprus national guard, Greek national contingent, EOKA B [paramilitary Greek loyalists] ... there will be sizeable elements who will actively oppose us by resorting to guerrilla warfare."

The total strength of "Greek loyal forces" was estimated at 55,000, but "standards of training are poor".

The assessment concluded that three brigades - as many as 15,000 soldiers - would be needed.

Close air support would also be necessary, but added: "Bitter experience has shown us that even a small number of dedicated men from the local population can pin down an inordinately large force for an indefinite period and we might well end up by facing an open-ended and expensive situation, like in Northern Ireland.

"Our chances of ever fully subduing the island as a whole ... must be extremely low."

Up to 23,000 service families, UK citizens and friendly nationals would be vulnerable to hostage-taking but evacuating them before an intervention "would make our intentions plain", it said.

The government hesitated and events moved faster than anticipated.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2005/jan/0 ... larchives1



Tentative plans for a Cypriot intervention

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2005/jan/0 ... larchives1

Here's the link reh imbecile, Pafidi!
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby Paphitis » Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:33 pm

Simon wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
Simon wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
B25 wrote:Paphiti, I respect many of the things you say, but I think you are the one being naive here if you believe for one minute that the US does not control NATO and the UN.

They are both there to print a 007 licence to kill for the US as it sees fit.

please tell me the difference between resolution 1441 against Iraq (that the US used as an excuse to attack) and the many resolutions against Turkey over Cyprus that they did nothing about?

There is your proof. Einai fos fanari, teleios kelptsia.


No I think you are being very naive for believing in America's absolute power within NATO and the UN, because you are basically saying that other countries such as UK, France, Germany, Canada etc etc have no say. There are at least 2 other superpower nations within NATO, and one thing is for sure, they are not there to simply just make up the numbers or be US subjects!

I am well aware that many Cypriots actually believe that NATO and US are synonymous, but that is simply not the case!


Paphitis, I would be interested to hear who you think the two other superpowers in NATO are?


France and Germany! :lol:


I thought so! :lol:

Let it be known that Paphitis regards Britain as a superpower, despite his earlier posts to me! :lol:


Britain is a superpower? Hah! :lol:

How can they be a superpower when Britain always relies on us Aussies to save the day? :lol:
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby Paphitis » Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:35 pm

Simon wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
Simon wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
B25 wrote:Paphiti, I respect many of the things you say, but I think you are the one being naive here if you believe for one minute that the US does not control NATO and the UN.

They are both there to print a 007 licence to kill for the US as it sees fit.

please tell me the difference between resolution 1441 against Iraq (that the US used as an excuse to attack) and the many resolutions against Turkey over Cyprus that they did nothing about?

There is your proof. Einai fos fanari, teleios kelptsia.


No I think you are being very naive for believing in America's absolute power within NATO and the UN, because you are basically saying that other countries such as UK, France, Germany, Canada etc etc have no say. There are at least 2 other superpower nations within NATO, and one thing is for sure, they are not there to simply just make up the numbers or be US subjects!

I am well aware that many Cypriots actually believe that NATO and US are synonymous, but that is simply not the case!


Paphitis, I would be interested to hear who you think the two other superpowers in NATO are?


BTW, don't think I have let you off the hook, because every single time you incompetent bozos get yourselves into a pickle, it is up to Australia and Canada to save your sorry arses... :lol:


I know you love us really! :lol:


Not since mother Britain is purely responsible for the biggest military blunders in modern history, resulting in thousands of Aussie casualties. :roll:
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby London » Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:36 pm

Paphitis wrote:
Simon wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
Simon wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
B25 wrote:Paphiti, I respect many of the things you say, but I think you are the one being naive here if you believe for one minute that the US does not control NATO and the UN.

They are both there to print a 007 licence to kill for the US as it sees fit.

please tell me the difference between resolution 1441 against Iraq (that the US used as an excuse to attack) and the many resolutions against Turkey over Cyprus that they did nothing about?

There is your proof. Einai fos fanari, teleios kelptsia.


No I think you are being very naive for believing in America's absolute power within NATO and the UN, because you are basically saying that other countries such as UK, France, Germany, Canada etc etc have no say. There are at least 2 other superpower nations within NATO, and one thing is for sure, they are not there to simply just make up the numbers or be US subjects!

I am well aware that many Cypriots actually believe that NATO and US are synonymous, but that is simply not the case!


Paphitis, I would be interested to hear who you think the two other superpowers in NATO are?


BTW, don't think I have let you off the hook, because every single time you incompetent bozos get yourselves into a pickle, it is up to Australia and Canada to save your sorry arses... :lol:


I know you love us really! :lol:


Not since mother Britain is purely responsible for the biggest military blunders in modern history, resulting in thousands of Aussie casualties. :roll:


Which events are you talking about?
London
Member
Member
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:08 am

Postby Simon » Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:40 pm

Paphitis wrote:
Simon wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
Simon wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
B25 wrote:Paphiti, I respect many of the things you say, but I think you are the one being naive here if you believe for one minute that the US does not control NATO and the UN.

They are both there to print a 007 licence to kill for the US as it sees fit.

please tell me the difference between resolution 1441 against Iraq (that the US used as an excuse to attack) and the many resolutions against Turkey over Cyprus that they did nothing about?

There is your proof. Einai fos fanari, teleios kelptsia.


No I think you are being very naive for believing in America's absolute power within NATO and the UN, because you are basically saying that other countries such as UK, France, Germany, Canada etc etc have no say. There are at least 2 other superpower nations within NATO, and one thing is for sure, they are not there to simply just make up the numbers or be US subjects!

I am well aware that many Cypriots actually believe that NATO and US are synonymous, but that is simply not the case!


Paphitis, I would be interested to hear who you think the two other superpowers in NATO are?


France and Germany! :lol:


I thought so! :lol:

Let it be known that Paphitis regards Britain as a superpower, despite his earlier posts to me! :lol:


Britain is a superpower? Hah! :lol:

How can they be a superpower when Britain always relies on us Aussies to save the day? :lol:


That is part of our superpower appeal. We can call upon the Anglosphere when necessary! :lol:
User avatar
Simon
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1955
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 5:47 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests