Cyprus-Forum.com

[GeorgeV97qaue]

This is powerful support for one of Brendan O'Malley and Ian Craig's main hypotheses in "The Cyprus Conspiracy".

It is not Tim. I recommend u to read 400 pages of CIA report that reveals the truth about why Britain did not want to join Turkey for an bilateral intervention. Though in above report it can also be seen in the first paragraph. Brits having the bitter experince of guerilla warfare with EOKA, were predicting a little chance of success, waging a guerilla warfare against EOKA-B. On the other hand US did not wish to internationalize the issue. There was nothing pre-planned. Everything developed under the then circumstances.

Please read all the details from CIA report:

http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.php?t=22700

Of course it was pre planned. How did the british press know where the turkish troops were being parachuted. They had their cameras at the right place at the right time. Turkey, US and UK were all in on it.

[Paphitis]

I assume this would have already been posted:

So any excuses for Turkeys 'Intervention' like 'saving the TC's' is utter
c--p.

It's not an excuse, Deniz. Intervention was necessary and Turkey intervened... Why do u think it was an excuse?

Ps: Barouti, provide a link to the above document please.

I am confident that NATO (in fact USA) had made their decision prior to the intervention.

Do you think I am wrong?


btw; I do believe the TCs were in danger from the Sampson regime.

How can NATO be infact USA, Deniz? Yes, I think u r wrong.

NATO is the 'mouth piece ' of America. NATO is America's brainchild. Have you forotten why it was formed? Do you remember the USSR? The great big bear?

Yes, I won't deny the strong influence of US in NATO but don't forget that there r many sovereign and strong European countries which r members of NATO, too... if NATO approved Turkish intervention in 1974 it was because they believed that was right not because of just US pressure...

Insan, you have to be the biggest idiot on this forum!

If some NATO countries approved of the invasion, then why don't those nations actually recognise the "trnc"? They don't recognise you, because they know that the Turkish invasion was wrong!

NATO, and the US knew from the outset that the invasion was illegal, so their support had to be covert.

What is your IQ again?

[GeorgeV97qaue]

I assume this would have already been posted:

So any excuses for Turkeys 'Intervention' like 'saving the TC's' is utter
c--p.

It's not an excuse, Deniz. Intervention was necessary and Turkey intervened... Why do u think it was an excuse?

Ps: Barouti, provide a link to the above document please.

I am confident that NATO (in fact USA) had made their decision prior to the intervention.

Do you think I am wrong?


btw; I do believe the TCs were in danger from the Sampson regime.

How can NATO be infact USA, Deniz? Yes, I think u r wrong.

NATO is the 'mouth piece ' of America. NATO is America's brainchild. Have you forotten why it was formed? Do you remember the USSR? The great big bear?

Yes, I won't deny the strong influence of US in NATO but don't forget that there r many sovereign and strong European countries which r members of NATO, too... if NATO approved Turkish intervention in 1974 it was because they believed that was right not because of just US pressure...

You do talk crap insan. Nato is america. Why are you so stupid. I guess because you dont want to give back what you stole.

[insan]

Sadly, Britain has a lot to answer for!

No more playing the "nice" guy!

You have proven to be as barbaric as Turks, but without the excuse that you are merely "backward"....

If the UK wants to hold her head up in world politics ever again, she has to REMOVE the Turks from Cyprus .....

Only EOKA-B, Junta and their backers have a lot to answer for! They were the only barbarians in Cyprus.

No No No how about your TMT dont forget them.

It is true that there were some extreme right wingers in TMT too but there weren't much similarities between EOKA-B and TMT. TMT was more like EOKA-A.

Had there been a lot of extreme right wingers in TMT, it would have been established in 1968 when Denktash began negotiating a solution to Cyprus problem or in 1970 when the first TC left wing party CTP was founded... There's no any fascist group in TC community which acted like EOKA-B.

[insan]

I assume this would have already been posted:

So any excuses for Turkeys 'Intervention' like 'saving the TC's' is utter
c--p.

It's not an excuse, Deniz. Intervention was necessary and Turkey intervened... Why do u think it was an excuse?

Ps: Barouti, provide a link to the above document please.

I am confident that NATO (in fact USA) had made their decision prior to the intervention.

Do you think I am wrong?


btw; I do believe the TCs were in danger from the Sampson regime.

How can NATO be infact USA, Deniz? Yes, I think u r wrong.

NATO is the 'mouth piece ' of America. NATO is America's brainchild. Have you forotten why it was formed? Do you remember the USSR? The great big bear?

Yes, I won't deny the strong influence of US in NATO but don't forget that there r many sovereign and strong European countries which r members of NATO, too... if NATO approved Turkish intervention in 1974 it was because they believed that was right not because of just US pressure...

You do talk crap insan. Nato is america. Why are you so stupid. I guess because you dont want to give back what you stole.

Don't talk crap, George! if NATO is US, what is Greece and all other NATO members job there?

And, btw; what's the relation between my acceptance of NATO being US and not giving back what we supposedly stole?

[GeorgeV97qaue]

Sadly, Britain has a lot to answer for!

No more playing the "nice" guy!

You have proven to be as barbaric as Turks, but without the excuse that you are merely "backward"....

If the UK wants to hold her head up in world politics ever again, she has to REMOVE the Turks from Cyprus .....

Only EOKA-B, Junta and their backers have a lot to answer for! They were the only barbarians in Cyprus.

No No No how about your TMT dont forget them.

It is true that there were some extreme right wingers in TMT too but there weren't much similarities between EOKA-B and TMT. TMT was more like EOKA-A.

Had there been a lot of extreme right wingers in TMT, it would have been established in 1968 when Denktash began negotiating a solution to Cyprus problem or in 1970 when the first TC left wing party CTP was founded... There's no any fascist group in TC community which acted like EOKA-B.

TMT were not fascist. What a load of crap. They were killing their own people to make them hate the GC's.

[GeorgeV97qaue]

I assume this would have already been posted:

So any excuses for Turkeys 'Intervention' like 'saving the TC's' is utter
c--p.

It's not an excuse, Deniz. Intervention was necessary and Turkey intervened... Why do u think it was an excuse?

Ps: Barouti, provide a link to the above document please.

I am confident that NATO (in fact USA) had made their decision prior to the intervention.

Do you think I am wrong?


btw; I do believe the TCs were in danger from the Sampson regime.

How can NATO be infact USA, Deniz? Yes, I think u r wrong.

NATO is the 'mouth piece ' of America. NATO is America's brainchild. Have you forotten why it was formed? Do you remember the USSR? The great big bear?

Yes, I won't deny the strong influence of US in NATO but don't forget that there r many sovereign and strong European countries which r members of NATO, too... if NATO approved Turkish intervention in 1974 it was because they believed that was right not because of just US pressure...

You do talk crap insan. Nato is america. Why are you so stupid. I guess because you dont want to give back what you stole.

Don't talk crap, George! if NATO is US, what is Greece and all other NATO members job there?

And, btw; what's the relation between my acceptance of NATO being US and not giving back what we supposedly stole?

I'm affraid it's you that is talking crap. Are you telling me Greece, France & Germany gave the go ahead for the invasion of Cyprus. It was Kissinger and America who did that with UK's help. You seem to forget it was at the height of the Cold War so america had to lick turkeys arse if they wanted to keep their bases. Nothing to do with it being right or anything else.

[insan]

I assume this would have already been posted:

So any excuses for Turkeys 'Intervention' like 'saving the TC's' is utter
c--p.

It's not an excuse, Deniz. Intervention was necessary and Turkey intervened... Why do u think it was an excuse?

Ps: Barouti, provide a link to the above document please.

I am confident that NATO (in fact USA) had made their decision prior to the intervention.

Do you think I am wrong?


btw; I do believe the TCs were in danger from the Sampson regime.

How can NATO be infact USA, Deniz? Yes, I think u r wrong.

NATO is the 'mouth piece ' of America. NATO is America's brainchild. Have you forotten why it was formed? Do you remember the USSR? The great big bear?

Yes, I won't deny the strong influence of US in NATO but don't forget that there r many sovereign and strong European countries which r members of NATO, too... if NATO approved Turkish intervention in 1974 it was because they believed that was right not because of just US pressure...

Insan, you have to be the biggest idiot on this forum!

If some NATO countries approved of the invasion, then why don't those nations actually recognise the "trnc"? They don't recognise you, because they know that the Turkish invasion was wrong!

NATO, and the US knew from the outset that the invasion was illegal, so their support had to be covert.

What is your IQ again?

The extreme idiot, Bafidi; i said IF NATO approved... it is the first time I hear that NATO approved Turkish intervention to Cyprus, in 1974. I googled abt that document and found out that it was published by only a several Hellenic propaganda websites, for a purpose most probably feed the anti-NATO sentiments of GCs and/or put the blame on US, Britain and Turkey with an aim whitewashing the actions of Greece, Junta, GC national front and EOKA-B that all primarily contributed to the Cyprus tragedy.

[insan]

I assume this would have already been posted:

So any excuses for Turkeys 'Intervention' like 'saving the TC's' is utter
c--p.

It's not an excuse, Deniz. Intervention was necessary and Turkey intervened... Why do u think it was an excuse?

Ps: Barouti, provide a link to the above document please.

I am confident that NATO (in fact USA) had made their decision prior to the intervention.

Do you think I am wrong?


btw; I do believe the TCs were in danger from the Sampson regime.

How can NATO be infact USA, Deniz? Yes, I think u r wrong.

NATO is the 'mouth piece ' of America. NATO is America's brainchild. Have you forotten why it was formed? Do you remember the USSR? The great big bear?

Yes, I won't deny the strong influence of US in NATO but don't forget that there r many sovereign and strong European countries which r members of NATO, too... if NATO approved Turkish intervention in 1974 it was because they believed that was right not because of just US pressure...

You do talk crap insan. Nato is america. Why are you so stupid. I guess because you dont want to give back what you stole.

Don't talk crap, George! if NATO is US, what is Greece and all other NATO members job there?

And, btw; what's the relation between my acceptance of NATO being US and not giving back what we supposedly stole?

I'm affraid it's you that is talking crap. Are you telling me Greece, France & Germany gave the go ahead for the invasion of Cyprus. It was Kissinger and America who did that with UK's help. You seem to forget it was at the height of the Cold War so america had to lick turkeys arse if they wanted to keep their bases. Nothing to do with it being right or anything else.

It's u r talking crap! It was Barudi's and Hellenic propaganda website's claim that NATO approved Turkish intervention. Go tell ur Hellenic propaganda websites how crap they talk!

[Paphitis]

I assume this would have already been posted:

So any excuses for Turkeys 'Intervention' like 'saving the TC's' is utter
c--p.

It's not an excuse, Deniz. Intervention was necessary and Turkey intervened... Why do u think it was an excuse?

Ps: Barouti, provide a link to the above document please.

I am confident that NATO (in fact USA) had made their decision prior to the intervention.

Do you think I am wrong?


btw; I do believe the TCs were in danger from the Sampson regime.

How can NATO be infact USA, Deniz? Yes, I think u r wrong.

NATO is the 'mouth piece ' of America. NATO is America's brainchild. Have you forotten why it was formed? Do you remember the USSR? The great big bear?

Yes, I won't deny the strong influence of US in NATO but don't forget that there r many sovereign and strong European countries which r members of NATO, too... if NATO approved Turkish intervention in 1974 it was because they believed that was right not because of just US pressure...

Insan, you have to be the biggest idiot on this forum!

If some NATO countries approved of the invasion, then why don't those nations actually recognise the "trnc"? They don't recognise you, because they know that the Turkish invasion was wrong!

NATO, and the US knew from the outset that the invasion was illegal, so their support had to be covert.

What is your IQ again?

The extreme idiot, Bafidi; i said IF NATO approved... it is the first time I hear that NATO approved Turkish intervention to Cyprus, in 1974. I googled abt that document and found out that it was published by only a several Hellenic propaganda websites, for a purpose most probably feed the anti-NATO sentiments of GCs and/or put the blame on US, Britain and Turkey with an aim whitewashing the actions of Greece, Junta, GC national front and EOKA-B that all primarily contributed to the Cyprus tragedy.

If NATO did not approve the invasion, then it would not have taken place you gollywog!