barouti wrote:I assume this would have already been posted:
denizaksulu wrote:barouti wrote:I assume this would have already been posted:
So any excuses for Turkeys 'Intervention' like 'saving the TC's' is utter
c--p.
barouti wrote:I assume this would have already been posted:
insan wrote:denizaksulu wrote:barouti wrote:I assume this would have already been posted:
So any excuses for Turkeys 'Intervention' like 'saving the TC's' is utter
c--p.
It's not an excuse, Deniz. Intervention was necessary and Turkey intervened... Why do u think it was an excuse?
Ps: Barouti, provide a link to the above document please.
denizaksulu wrote:insan wrote:denizaksulu wrote:barouti wrote:I assume this would have already been posted:
So any excuses for Turkeys 'Intervention' like 'saving the TC's' is utter
c--p.
It's not an excuse, Deniz. Intervention was necessary and Turkey intervened... Why do u think it was an excuse?
Ps: Barouti, provide a link to the above document please.
I am confident that NATO (in fact USA) had made their decision prior to the intervention.
Do you think I am wrong?
btw; I do believe the TCs were in danger from the Sampson regime.
insan wrote:denizaksulu wrote:insan wrote:denizaksulu wrote:barouti wrote:I assume this would have already been posted:
So any excuses for Turkeys 'Intervention' like 'saving the TC's' is utter
c--p.
It's not an excuse, Deniz. Intervention was necessary and Turkey intervened... Why do u think it was an excuse?
Ps: Barouti, provide a link to the above document please.
I am confident that NATO (in fact USA) had made their decision prior to the intervention.
Do you think I am wrong?
btw; I do believe the TCs were in danger from the Sampson regime.
How can NATO be infact USA, Deniz? Yes, I think u r wrong.
denizaksulu wrote:insan wrote:denizaksulu wrote:insan wrote:denizaksulu wrote:barouti wrote:I assume this would have already been posted:
So any excuses for Turkeys 'Intervention' like 'saving the TC's' is utter
c--p.
It's not an excuse, Deniz. Intervention was necessary and Turkey intervened... Why do u think it was an excuse?
Ps: Barouti, provide a link to the above document please.
I am confident that NATO (in fact USA) had made their decision prior to the intervention.
Do you think I am wrong?
btw; I do believe the TCs were in danger from the Sampson regime.
How can NATO be infact USA, Deniz? Yes, I think u r wrong.
NATO is the 'mouth piece ' of America. NATO is America's brainchild. Have you forotten why it was formed? Do you remember the USSR? The great big bear?
insan wrote:Oracle wrote:Sadly, Britain has a lot to answer for!
No more playing the "nice" guy!
You have proven to be as barbaric as Turks, but without the excuse that you are merely "backward"....
If the UK wants to hold her head up in world politics ever again, she has to REMOVE the Turks from Cyprus .....
Only EOKA-B, Junta and their backers have a lot to answer for! They were the only barbarians in Cyprus.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest