The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


take a third of the island but make it quick.

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby bill cobbett » Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:26 pm

eracles wrote:http://naa12.naa.gov.au/scripts/imagine.asp?B=588483&I=1&SE=1

The full folder is here - seems impossible to link to particular pages but i think there was a 2nd page to that document.


Bleedin' 'ell. There's 286 pages!!
User avatar
bill cobbett
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 15759
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Embargoed from Kyrenia by Jurkish Army and Genocided (many times) by Thieving, Brain-Washed Lordo

Postby Tim Drayton » Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:34 pm

insan wrote:
Tim Drayton wrote:This is powerful support for one of Brendan O'Malley and Ian Craig's main hypotheses in "The Cyprus Conspiracy".


It is not Tim. I recommend u to read 400 pages of CIA report that reveals the truth about why Britain did not want to join Turkey for an bilateral intervention. Though in above report it can also be seen in the first paragraph. Brits having the bitter experince of guerilla warfare with EOKA, were predicting a little chance of success, waging a guerilla warfare against EOKA-B. On the other hand US did not wish to internationalize the issue. There was nothing pre-planned. Everything developed under the then circumstances.

Please read all the details from CIA report:

http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.php?t=22700


I will try to find time to read this CIA report, but even at first glance I fail to undertsand how a report dated February 21, 1973 can provide any clear evidence about events that took place more than a year later.
User avatar
Tim Drayton
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8799
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:32 am
Location: Limassol/Lemesos

Postby insan » Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:36 pm

Tim Drayton wrote:
insan wrote:
Tim Drayton wrote:This is powerful support for one of Brendan O'Malley and Ian Craig's main hypotheses in "The Cyprus Conspiracy".


It is not Tim. I recommend u to read 400 pages of CIA report that reveals the truth about why Britain did not want to join Turkey for an bilateral intervention. Though in above report it can also be seen in the first paragraph. Brits having the bitter experince of guerilla warfare with EOKA, were predicting a little chance of success, waging a guerilla warfare against EOKA-B. On the other hand US did not wish to internationalize the issue. There was nothing pre-planned. Everything developed under the then circumstances.

Please read all the details from CIA report:

http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.php?t=22700


I will try to find time to read this CIA report, but even at first glance I fail to undertsand how a report dated February 21, 1973 can provide any clear evidence about events that took place more than a year later.


The report covers the years 1973-1976. Scroll down Tim. :wink:
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby Oracle » Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:37 pm

Tim Drayton wrote:
insan wrote:
Tim Drayton wrote:This is powerful support for one of Brendan O'Malley and Ian Craig's main hypotheses in "The Cyprus Conspiracy".


It is not Tim. I recommend u to read 400 pages of CIA report that reveals the truth about why Britain did not want to join Turkey for an bilateral intervention. Though in above report it can also be seen in the first paragraph. Brits having the bitter experince of guerilla warfare with EOKA, were predicting a little chance of success, waging a guerilla warfare against EOKA-B. On the other hand US did not wish to internationalize the issue. There was nothing pre-planned. Everything developed under the then circumstances.

Please read all the details from CIA report:

http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.php?t=22700


I will try to find time to read this CIA report, but even at first glance I fail to undertsand how a report dated February 21, 1973 can provide any clear evidence about events that took place more than a year later.


:lol:

You have to make allowances for insan ... he has been experimenting with psychedelic drugs for the best part of 3 decades .... :lol:
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Tim Drayton » Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:37 pm

insan wrote:
Tim Drayton wrote:
insan wrote:
Tim Drayton wrote:This is powerful support for one of Brendan O'Malley and Ian Craig's main hypotheses in "The Cyprus Conspiracy".


It is not Tim. I recommend u to read 400 pages of CIA report that reveals the truth about why Britain did not want to join Turkey for an bilateral intervention. Though in above report it can also be seen in the first paragraph. Brits having the bitter experince of guerilla warfare with EOKA, were predicting a little chance of success, waging a guerilla warfare against EOKA-B. On the other hand US did not wish to internationalize the issue. There was nothing pre-planned. Everything developed under the then circumstances.

Please read all the details from CIA report:

http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.php?t=22700


I will try to find time to read this CIA report, but even at first glance I fail to undertsand how a report dated February 21, 1973 can provide any clear evidence about events that took place more than a year later.


The report covers the years 1973-1976. Scroll down Tim. :wink:


OK
User avatar
Tim Drayton
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8799
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:32 am
Location: Limassol/Lemesos

Postby insan » Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:44 pm

Not only Turkey but USSR was unhappy at the c'oup too and concerned abt it's implications for the regime, particularly for Soviet interests. The USSR would have difficulties in supporting military action by Turkey.

http://naa16.naa.gov.au/rs_images/ShowI ... 83&S=8&T=R
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby YFred » Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:48 pm

insan wrote:Not only Turkey but USSR was unhappy at the c'oup too and concerned abt it's implications for the regime, particularly for Soviet interests. The USSR would have difficulties in supporting military action by Turkey.

http://naa16.naa.gov.au/rs_images/ShowI ... 83&S=8&T=R

Don't show this document to our friend Bafities and the rest of the Australian greeks, they will get very upset that all Australian soldiers were safely in the British bases instead of doing fighting.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby insan » Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:49 pm

Oracle wrote:
Tim Drayton wrote:
insan wrote:
Tim Drayton wrote:This is powerful support for one of Brendan O'Malley and Ian Craig's main hypotheses in "The Cyprus Conspiracy".


It is not Tim. I recommend u to read 400 pages of CIA report that reveals the truth about why Britain did not want to join Turkey for an bilateral intervention. Though in above report it can also be seen in the first paragraph. Brits having the bitter experince of guerilla warfare with EOKA, were predicting a little chance of success, waging a guerilla warfare against EOKA-B. On the other hand US did not wish to internationalize the issue. There was nothing pre-planned. Everything developed under the then circumstances.

Please read all the details from CIA report:

http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.php?t=22700


I will try to find time to read this CIA report, but even at first glance I fail to undertsand how a report dated February 21, 1973 can provide any clear evidence about events that took place more than a year later.


:lol:

You have to make allowances for insan ... he has been experimenting with psychedelic drugs for the best part of 3 decades .... :lol:


:roll: R u conscious dear? What's the relevance with what Tim said? I've told ya not to sniff those psychedelic plants too much. :lol:
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby insan » Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:53 pm

YFred wrote:
insan wrote:Not only Turkey but USSR was unhappy at the c'oup too and concerned abt it's implications for the regime, particularly for Soviet interests. The USSR would have difficulties in supporting military action by Turkey.

http://naa16.naa.gov.au/rs_images/ShowI ... 83&S=8&T=R

Don't show this document to our friend Bafities and the rest of the Australian greeks, they will get very upset that all Australian soldiers were safely in the British bases instead of doing fighting.
:lol: :lol: :lol:


Archbishop Seraphim called on Greeks "TO SETTLE THEIR FINAL ACCOUNT WITH TURKS" :lol: YFfred, do u remember any of our Head Imams called on Turks to do something to Greeks? Lemme check the report. :lol:

http://naa16.naa.gov.au/rs_images/ShowI ... 83&S=9&T=R
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby YFred » Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:00 am

insan wrote:
YFred wrote:
insan wrote:Not only Turkey but USSR was unhappy at the c'oup too and concerned abt it's implications for the regime, particularly for Soviet interests. The USSR would have difficulties in supporting military action by Turkey.

http://naa16.naa.gov.au/rs_images/ShowI ... 83&S=8&T=R

Don't show this document to our friend Bafities and the rest of the Australian greeks, they will get very upset that all Australian soldiers were safely in the British bases instead of doing fighting.
:lol: :lol: :lol:


Archbishop Seraphim called on Greeks "TO SETTLE THEIR FINAL ACCOUNT WITH TURKS" :lol: YFfred, do u remember any of our Head Imams called on Turks to do something to Greeks? Lemme check the report. :lol:

http://naa16.naa.gov.au/rs_images/ShowI ... 83&S=9&T=R

Ye, I never trusted the bishop types. They look a bit suspicious with those long black dresses they wear. Can't quite make their minds up whether they are men or women. :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests