Get Real! wrote:Oracle wrote:Get Real! wrote:Simon wrote:You are right GR, the thousands of pieces of evidence and magnificient architecture etc, testifying to the magnificent ancient Greek civilisation is all just a figment of everyone's imagination.
Five or ten thousand years from now, archeologists will be uncovering fragments of F22-Raptors buried all over Afghanistan and will be forgiven for surmising that the ancient Afghanis of the 21st century were at the forefront of technology!
What you find under ground doesn’t always tell the true story…
No one uses one piece of "credible evidence" to draw up thousands of years of history!
The limits of your inability to grasp the holistics of history and anthropology are breathless in their inanity ...
Admit it GR! ... you are a merely a militant and not an academic.
When we take into consideration (1)
who writes the history of any given place, (2)
how much of it is convenient speculation, and (3) how much more was
lost as a result of successive rulers removing traces of their beaten enemies… you start to realize that what we’ve got in our history books today is a nice Greek salad! (pun intended)
So what evidence do you have that the Greeks build their Greek civilisation in Greece and around Greece, on some unknown predecessors whom they beat up, eradicated completely, and set themselves up in their place?
Yes reputations of warriors and such like are prone to interpretation, like the Romans' attempts to nullify Cleopatra's Greek descendancy to justify their attack ... but
whole civilisations, completely made, up as you are suggesting!
I would buy it ... if there was an ounce of evidence, instead of you just behaving like Bananiot to re-write history, because you are too afraid to face the Turks any longer!