Come on GR, you can do better than that. A very weak counter-argument.
"Seem" is defined as something that appears to exist. If something appears to exist, there is obviously evidence for it that goes beyond conjecture. So your only argument is, that it is not Minoan because the word "seem" is used. Where is your evidence that it is not Minoan?
No "seem" is used here:
"Parent Systems: Linear A - Cypro-Minoan"
"It has been established that the Cypriot Syllabary is derived from the Linear A script and most probably, the Minoan writing system. The most obvious change is the disappearance of ideograms, which were frequent and represented a significant part of Linear A. The earliest inscriptions of this script is found on clay tablets. Parallel to the evolution of cuneiform, the signs soon became simple patterns of lines. There are some evidence of a semitic influence due to trade, but this pattern seemed to have evolved as the result of habitual use".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cypriot_syllabary
There is clear evidence because of the similarity between the scripts amongst other things. You think this just happened by chance? It is well known that the Minoans were active in the region. I'm not implying anything is derived from Minoan, BUT THE EVIDENCE IS and therefore the experts are. That is why I provided the links!
There is mountains of evidence that Alexander the Great was Greek. Don't tell me you buy into Skopje's propaganda?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_the_Great
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic_f ... reat.shtml
http://www.macedonian-heritage.gr/Alexander.html
Even in the movie Alexander, he was unmistakably regarded as Greek; and this film used the expertise of Robin Lane Foxe - Oxford historian and premier Alexander expert. Which culture did Alexander spread? Which language? Why did Alexander's parents regard themselves as descendants of Achilles and Hercules, Greek heroes? The fact that Alexander was Greek is accepted by the vast majority of historians and experts.
With regards to the Byzantines, well they spoke Greek, followed Orthodoxy, and the majority of the population of the Empire regarded themselves as Greeks. The Empire is also known as 'Empire of the Greeks' and during this time, Cyprus always retained its uniquely Greek culture. Hence, Cypriots regarded themselves as Greek.
Just because Cyprus had a culture before the Greeks arrived does not in any way shape or form mean that it is not Greek today. Such a logic is ridiculous. Greeks colonised Cyprus and integrated with the locals, who adopted Greek culture, the Greek alphabet, religion etc. Like I said before, Crete had a great culture before the Greeks arrived, does that mean they are not Greek? Britain had a culture before the anglo-saxons arrived, does that mean the English are not anglo-saxons? You can go on forever like this. It doesn't prove anything.