The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


The bankrupt policy of ‘all or nothing’

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby insan » Tue Mar 17, 2009 4:21 pm

boomerang wrote:
insan wrote:
DT. wrote:
Bananiot wrote:DT, what do you find offensive in utu´s comment?

Turkey has more than its fair share of blame, but as long as the Greek Cypriots blame solely Turkey and the Greek military Junta, there is not going to be any real solution.

I think it is very fair and balanced. Can we agree on this?


I didn't even comment on utu's post. I'm all for recognising our mistakes. The only people in denial here are a few tc's and turks who claim turkey came here to "save" them.

I recognise Makarios's mistakes, Clerides's mistakes, Vasiiliou's mistakes, Kyprianou's mistakes and now I am starting to recognise Christofias's mistakes.

There is no point in your friend YFred recognising or admitting to the mistakes the turkish side committed (not that he ever would), because they were'nt mistakes they were crimes still being committed to this day Bananiot!


If not accepting minority status was/is a mistake, TCs and Turkey had/has a mistake. What other mistakes did Turkey and TCs? Don't tell what inevitable was a mistake.


come on titty man...spill the beans...it was capitalism and globalism....


@DT

excellent post...


Still it is. Boomsy bumsy dumbazzy man. :lol: So stop crying and keep pace with the globalization. :D
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby boomerang » Tue Mar 17, 2009 4:23 pm

insan wrote:
boomerang wrote:
insan wrote:
DT. wrote:
Bananiot wrote:DT, what do you find offensive in utu´s comment?

Turkey has more than its fair share of blame, but as long as the Greek Cypriots blame solely Turkey and the Greek military Junta, there is not going to be any real solution.

I think it is very fair and balanced. Can we agree on this?


I didn't even comment on utu's post. I'm all for recognising our mistakes. The only people in denial here are a few tc's and turks who claim turkey came here to "save" them.

I recognise Makarios's mistakes, Clerides's mistakes, Vasiiliou's mistakes, Kyprianou's mistakes and now I am starting to recognise Christofias's mistakes.

There is no point in your friend YFred recognising or admitting to the mistakes the turkish side committed (not that he ever would), because they were'nt mistakes they were crimes still being committed to this day Bananiot!


If not accepting minority status was/is a mistake, TCs and Turkey had/has a mistake. What other mistakes did Turkey and TCs? Don't tell what inevitable was a mistake.


come on titty man...spill the beans...it was capitalism and globalism....


@DT

excellent post...


Still it is. Boomsy bumsy dumbazzy man. :lol: So stop crying and keep pace with the globalization. :D


an idiot embargoed 35 odd years is gonna teach us globalism and capitalism... this has to be the joke of the century titty man... :lol:

don't ever forget titty man...your asses are owned big time... :lol:


now table 6 is needing your immediate attention...see that you get to it immediately :lol:
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

Postby insan » Tue Mar 17, 2009 4:31 pm

boomerang wrote:
insan wrote:
boomerang wrote:
insan wrote:
DT. wrote:
Bananiot wrote:DT, what do you find offensive in utu´s comment?

Turkey has more than its fair share of blame, but as long as the Greek Cypriots blame solely Turkey and the Greek military Junta, there is not going to be any real solution.

I think it is very fair and balanced. Can we agree on this?


I didn't even comment on utu's post. I'm all for recognising our mistakes. The only people in denial here are a few tc's and turks who claim turkey came here to "save" them.

I recognise Makarios's mistakes, Clerides's mistakes, Vasiiliou's mistakes, Kyprianou's mistakes and now I am starting to recognise Christofias's mistakes.

There is no point in your friend YFred recognising or admitting to the mistakes the turkish side committed (not that he ever would), because they were'nt mistakes they were crimes still being committed to this day Bananiot!


If not accepting minority status was/is a mistake, TCs and Turkey had/has a mistake. What other mistakes did Turkey and TCs? Don't tell what inevitable was a mistake.


come on titty man...spill the beans...it was capitalism and globalism....


@DT

excellent post...


Still it is. Boomsy bumsy dumbazzy man. :lol: So stop crying and keep pace with the globalization. :D


an idiot embargoed 35 odd years is gonna teach us globalism and capitalism... this has to be the joke of the century titty man... :lol:

don't ever forget titty man...your asses are owned big time... :lol:


now table 6 is needing your immediate attention...see that you get to it immediately :lol:


In ur dreams boomsy bumsy dumbazzy man. My mind has no borders, while ur mind is limited with the borders of ur illiteracy. :lol:
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby boomerang » Tue Mar 17, 2009 4:36 pm

insan wrote:
boomerang wrote:
insan wrote:
boomerang wrote:
insan wrote:
DT. wrote:
Bananiot wrote:DT, what do you find offensive in utu´s comment?

Turkey has more than its fair share of blame, but as long as the Greek Cypriots blame solely Turkey and the Greek military Junta, there is not going to be any real solution.

I think it is very fair and balanced. Can we agree on this?


I didn't even comment on utu's post. I'm all for recognising our mistakes. The only people in denial here are a few tc's and turks who claim turkey came here to "save" them.

I recognise Makarios's mistakes, Clerides's mistakes, Vasiiliou's mistakes, Kyprianou's mistakes and now I am starting to recognise Christofias's mistakes.

There is no point in your friend YFred recognising or admitting to the mistakes the turkish side committed (not that he ever would), because they were'nt mistakes they were crimes still being committed to this day Bananiot!


If not accepting minority status was/is a mistake, TCs and Turkey had/has a mistake. What other mistakes did Turkey and TCs? Don't tell what inevitable was a mistake.


come on titty man...spill the beans...it was capitalism and globalism....


@DT

excellent post...


Still it is. Boomsy bumsy dumbazzy man. :lol: So stop crying and keep pace with the globalization. :D


an idiot embargoed 35 odd years is gonna teach us globalism and capitalism... this has to be the joke of the century titty man... :lol:

don't ever forget titty man...your asses are owned big time... :lol:


now table 6 is needing your immediate attention...see that you get to it immediately :lol:


In ur dreams boomsy bumsy dumbazzy man. My mind has no borders, while ur mind is limited with the borders of ur illiteracy. :lol:


are we to assume you have a mind?... :lol: ...you having a mind is a fiction of your own imagination titty man... :lol:
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

Postby Bananiot » Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:33 am

DT wrote:

I don't think Utu is TC actully. You seem to be stuck on all this admittion of crimes. The GC side can admit, confess and repent for everything those gangs of fanatics committed in the 60's. A situation so dark and badly recorded that sometimes you feel that this period happened in another country and not our own. And yet, we admit to these crimes and take our fair share of what these individuals had done. Careful now, this is the important bit the fact that we admit that these crimes happened and share our shame with the world depsite the fact that they never happened in the name or desire of 95% of the population of the Cypriots.
Yet we grudgingly admit to these killings and murders een though we were never taught them. Personally I still find fault of the TC's with a well orchestrated withdrawal from govt that gave our fanatics the perfect signal to carry out their share of horrors. But I could never ever understand the maniacs that committed the crimes that they did against TC civilians. Our biggest mistake as a community was not ignoring both Makarios and Clerides whe they pardoned these bastards and hunt them down ourselves. We should have hung them in ELeftheria Sq for the whole world to see.


The same can be said by the TC's with the activities of the TMT. The ordinary TC never gave a carte blanche to these officers from Turkey who were kidnapping and slaugthering GC's either. This one however gets notched down as self defense. How the hell we've reached a stage where slaughtering and heinous crimes against humanity are excused as self defense is beyond me. (by both sides!!)

The 3rd one is the invasion. This is the Big one for me and the one that baffles me the most. Grown men, educated and with families have sat on their PC's and told the forum that the invasion was a peace intervention to save the GC's and the TC's. They told us how no GC civilians were killed during this even though most of us have family that died in 74. They told us they would never have fired had the GC's not fired back and kept a straight face while those of us who remembered the F5's dropping bombs on the villages read with disbelief. They told us that all our missing where killed by the coup when everyday more and more brave TC's are confessing what their entire village knows, that the well on the mountain contains something more than water. Excuses, more excuses and more excuses....and then I sit and wonder. WHat make s a grown man lie like this in someone else's face when that someone else has obviosuly been affected so much by this?

FOr the life of me the only reason I can find is that its the fear of having your words used against you on a later argument. So we sit here and sell our souls to our own propaganda machine for a lousy argument.

Sorry if I dragged on.


Thank you for this response DT. I believe it provides the basis for some serious debate, despite the fact that you started aggressively (just like APOEL). I am referring to the point you made about me being stuck on an issue which probably you find not worth considering. I think that a good start will be made if all of us recognise our crimes, assume responsibilities for them and ask for forgiveness. It will be a good start, especially if we are interested to find a common language that will enable us to move on. It is a simple case of burying the skeletons. Anyway, lets move on to more important aspects of the events that led to the Cyprus tragedy.

You write about gangs of fanatics that represented only 5% of our community which was responsible for committing crimes. (Piratis recognises that crimes were committed only by EOKA B, despite the fact that EOKA B was not around in the early 60`s). I cannot agree with your thesis. In our community, paramilitary organisations were set up and funded by the government, under the leadership of Makarios. They were led by blood-thirsty warlords of the kind of Lyssarides, Yiorgadjis and Sampson. Their sole aim was to prevent a reaction by the Turkish Cypriots to the proposals of Makarios for changes to the constitution and to ensure that these changes would take effect regardless of the desires of the Turkish Cypriot community. What Makarios did was unconstitutional and it violated our signatures that were placed on the agreements only 3 years before. Enosis was the predominant issue in the Greek Cypriot community at the time and it is no secret that we wanted to use the agreements as a stepping stone to achieve our age long desire of union with Greece. We still boast that 99% of the Greek Cypriot community voted for enosis only a few years prior. Denktash and other nationalist elements in the Turkish Cypriot community embarked on a course that would encourage the Greek Cypriot leadership to pursue a path that would lead to an armed conflict. Both sides were thus preparing for this eventuality.

Our side fell into the trap set by Denktash quite willingly because we underestimated the Turkish Cypriots and overrated our ability to contain a head to head conflict. Denktash succeeded in another way too, just as important, by convincing the majority of the Turkish Cypriots that their very existence was in danger. We in fact helped Denktash to gain the respect of the Turkish Cypriots when our warlords started killing innocent Turkish Cypriots and then making these killings appear as heroic acts against a barbaric enemy. Every Turkish Cypriot we killed then brought us one step closer to partition but foolishly we shouted hooray while Denktash rubbed his hands with delight too. Perhaps you are right DT and only 5% did the killings but the remaining 95% not only kept quite but unfortunately condoned the killings. You see, we were fighting a war at the time and we were blinded by the noble aim of this war which was to fulfil our national so called aspirations.

I will carry on later, time permitting.
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Postby DT. » Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:05 am

Bananiot wrote:DT wrote:

I don't think Utu is TC actully. You seem to be stuck on all this admittion of crimes. The GC side can admit, confess and repent for everything those gangs of fanatics committed in the 60's. A situation so dark and badly recorded that sometimes you feel that this period happened in another country and not our own. And yet, we admit to these crimes and take our fair share of what these individuals had done. Careful now, this is the important bit the fact that we admit that these crimes happened and share our shame with the world depsite the fact that they never happened in the name or desire of 95% of the population of the Cypriots.
Yet we grudgingly admit to these killings and murders een though we were never taught them. Personally I still find fault of the TC's with a well orchestrated withdrawal from govt that gave our fanatics the perfect signal to carry out their share of horrors. But I could never ever understand the maniacs that committed the crimes that they did against TC civilians. Our biggest mistake as a community was not ignoring both Makarios and Clerides whe they pardoned these bastards and hunt them down ourselves. We should have hung them in ELeftheria Sq for the whole world to see.


The same can be said by the TC's with the activities of the TMT. The ordinary TC never gave a carte blanche to these officers from Turkey who were kidnapping and slaugthering GC's either. This one however gets notched down as self defense. How the hell we've reached a stage where slaughtering and heinous crimes against humanity are excused as self defense is beyond me. (by both sides!!)

The 3rd one is the invasion. This is the Big one for me and the one that baffles me the most. Grown men, educated and with families have sat on their PC's and told the forum that the invasion was a peace intervention to save the GC's and the TC's. They told us how no GC civilians were killed during this even though most of us have family that died in 74. They told us they would never have fired had the GC's not fired back and kept a straight face while those of us who remembered the F5's dropping bombs on the villages read with disbelief. They told us that all our missing where killed by the coup when everyday more and more brave TC's are confessing what their entire village knows, that the well on the mountain contains something more than water. Excuses, more excuses and more excuses....and then I sit and wonder. WHat make s a grown man lie like this in someone else's face when that someone else has obviosuly been affected so much by this?

FOr the life of me the only reason I can find is that its the fear of having your words used against you on a later argument. So we sit here and sell our souls to our own propaganda machine for a lousy argument.

Sorry if I dragged on.


Thank you for this response DT. I believe it provides the basis for some serious debate, despite the fact that you started aggressively (just like APOEL). I am referring to the point you made about me being stuck on an issue which probably you find not worth considering. I think that a good start will be made if all of us recognise our crimes, assume responsibilities for them and ask for forgiveness. It will be a good start, especially if we are interested to find a common language that will enable us to move on. It is a simple case of burying the skeletons. Anyway, lets move on to more important aspects of the events that led to the Cyprus tragedy.

You write about gangs of fanatics that represented only 5% of our community which was responsible for committing crimes. (Piratis recognises that crimes were committed only by EOKA B, despite the fact that EOKA B was not around in the early 60`s). I cannot agree with your thesis. In our community, paramilitary organisations were set up and funded by the government, under the leadership of Makarios. They were led by blood-thirsty warlords of the kind of Lyssarides, Yiorgadjis and Sampson. Their sole aim was to prevent a reaction by the Turkish Cypriots to the proposals of Makarios for changes to the constitution and to ensure that these changes would take effect regardless of the desires of the Turkish Cypriot community. What Makarios did was unconstitutional and it violated our signatures that were placed on the agreements only 3 years before. Enosis was the predominant issue in the Greek Cypriot community at the time and it is no secret that we wanted to use the agreements as a stepping stone to achieve our age long desire of union with Greece. We still boast that 99% of the Greek Cypriot community voted for enosis only a few years prior. Denktash and other nationalist elements in the Turkish Cypriot community embarked on a course that would encourage the Greek Cypriot leadership to pursue a path that would lead to an armed conflict. Both sides were thus preparing for this eventuality.

Our side fell into the trap set by Denktash quite willingly because we underestimated the Turkish Cypriots and overrated our ability to contain a head to head conflict. Denktash succeeded in another way too, just as important, by convincing the majority of the Turkish Cypriots that their very existence was in danger. We in fact helped Denktash to gain the respect of the Turkish Cypriots when our warlords started killing innocent Turkish Cypriots and then making these killings appear as heroic acts against a barbaric enemy. Every Turkish Cypriot we killed then brought us one step closer to partition but foolishly we shouted hooray while Denktash rubbed his hands with delight too. Perhaps you are right DT and only 5% did the killings but the remaining 95% not only kept quite but unfortunately condoned the killings. You see, we were fighting a war at the time and we were blinded by the noble aim of this war which was to fulfil our national so called aspirations.

I will carry on later, time permitting.


I'd appreciate your comments on the other paragraphs as well Bananiot..not just the first one.
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby Piratis » Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:06 am

The fact is that the 1960 agreements were not what the Cypriots wanted, but what was forced on us by the British and the Turks, and served the interests of the British, the Turks and the small Turkish minority, on the expense of the native Cypriot people.

The inter-communal conflict didn't start in the 60s, but in 1958 when we were attacked by the TCs, as part of their collaboration with the colonialists and with the aim to deny to Cypriots their freedom and self-determination.

Makarios in 1963 simply proposed changes that would make Cyprus more democratic and create a Cypriot constitution for Cyprus. If the Turks had accepted the democratic reforms then there would be no conflict, but they instead choose to attack us. Yet you blame us because we were prepared to defend ourselves in case the Turks choose to attack again?

If it wasn't for the Athens Junta and EOKA B then the democratic reforms of Makarios would have been eventfully implemented. In fact if Makarios had not made an attempt for democratic reforms, and the Cyprus government continued to be dysfunctional and problematic and with the TC minority getting the 30% of government jobs, the dissatisfaction of the majority of Cypriots from the Cypriot government would be so great that probably a lot more of them would support the coup.

Therefore you can blame Makarios for some of his choices before 1960 (and accepting the Zurich agreements could be one of the mistakes) but after 1960 he did what he had to do, and if some minority of extremists who thought they knew better (Bananiots) had not gone against the will of the majority, then Turkey would not get her excuse to invade Cyprus, and Cyprus would gradually become more independent and truly democratic.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby CopperLine » Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:37 am

DT. wrote:
Bananiot wrote:I did not say you did, I mere wantd your comment. In my opinion there is a queue of GC forumers who do not recognise that we did mistakes. Piratis, in his last post, claims that our mistakes were simply political (whatever this means). Thus, Erk´s father who was dragged out of hospital bed, shot and thrown into a well, was just a political (!) mistake, not a crime. Perhaps he means that crimes could be a result of wrong policies but really i cannot follow him on this one. Also, he indirectly accepts that Makarios made mistakes because he was politically uneducated but then, in the same breath, he says that after 1960 he made only one mistake, that of accepting federation. Piratis is one badly confused chap.

Enough on Piratis (bet you he will now resort to his infamous percentages - we killed one you killed tens) let us go back to our original argument. Utu is TC isn´t he? He is rather generous in apportioning blame on his own community and Turkey. We should now see what some GC´s say, besides Piratis. Have we committed any crimes? Which were they? Can we admit to some of them? Is it patriotic to deny them?


I don't think Utu is TC actully. You seem to be stuck on all this admittion of crimes. The GC side can admit, confess and repent for everything those gangs of fanatics committed in the 60's. A situation so dark and badly recorded that sometimes you feel that this period happened in another country and not our own. And yet, we admit to these crimes and take our fair share of what these individuals had done. Careful now, this is the important bit the fact that we admit that these crimes happened and share our shame with the world depsite the fact that they never happened in the name or desire of 95% of the population of the Cypriots.
Yet we grudgingly admit to these killings and murders een though we were never taught them. Personally I still find fault of the TC's with a well orchestrated withdrawal from govt that gave our fanatics the perfect signal to carry out their share of horrors. But I could never ever understand the maniacs that committed the crimes that they did against TC civilians. Our biggest mistake as a community was not ignoring both Makarios and Clerides whe they pardoned these bastards and hunt them down ourselves. We should have hung them in ELeftheria Sq for the whole world to see.


The same can be said by the TC's with the activities of the TMT. The ordinary TC never gave a carte blanche to these officers from Turkey who were kidnapping and slaugthering GC's either. This one however gets notched down as self defense. How the hell we've reached a stage where slaughtering and heinous crimes against humanity are excused as self defense is beyond me. (by both sides!!)

The 3rd one is the invasion. This is the Big one for me and the one that baffles me the most. Grown men, educated and with families have sat on their PC's and told the forum that the invasion was a peace intervention to save the GC's and the TC's. They told us how no GC civilians were killed during this even though most of us have family that died in 74. They told us they would never have fired had the GC's not fired back and kept a straight face while those of us who remembered the F5's dropping bombs on the villages read with disbelief. They told us that all our missing where killed by the coup when everyday more and more brave TC's are confessing what their entire village knows, that the well on the mountain contains something more than water. Excuses, more excuses and more excuses....and then I sit and wonder. WHat make s a grown man lie like this in someone else's face when that someone else has obviosuly been affected so much by this?

FOr the life of me the only reason I can find is that its the fear of having your words used against you on a later argument. So we sit here and sell our souls to our own propaganda machine for a lousy argument.

Sorry if I dragged on.


Very well said DT.
User avatar
CopperLine
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1558
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:04 pm

Postby YFred » Wed Mar 18, 2009 2:33 pm

CopperLine wrote:
DT. wrote:
Bananiot wrote:I did not say you did, I mere wantd your comment. In my opinion there is a queue of GC forumers who do not recognise that we did mistakes. Piratis, in his last post, claims that our mistakes were simply political (whatever this means). Thus, Erk´s father who was dragged out of hospital bed, shot and thrown into a well, was just a political (!) mistake, not a crime. Perhaps he means that crimes could be a result of wrong policies but really i cannot follow him on this one. Also, he indirectly accepts that Makarios made mistakes because he was politically uneducated but then, in the same breath, he says that after 1960 he made only one mistake, that of accepting federation. Piratis is one badly confused chap.

Enough on Piratis (bet you he will now resort to his infamous percentages - we killed one you killed tens) let us go back to our original argument. Utu is TC isn´t he? He is rather generous in apportioning blame on his own community and Turkey. We should now see what some GC´s say, besides Piratis. Have we committed any crimes? Which were they? Can we admit to some of them? Is it patriotic to deny them?


I don't think Utu is TC actully. You seem to be stuck on all this admittion of crimes. The GC side can admit, confess and repent for everything those gangs of fanatics committed in the 60's. A situation so dark and badly recorded that sometimes you feel that this period happened in another country and not our own. And yet, we admit to these crimes and take our fair share of what these individuals had done. Careful now, this is the important bit the fact that we admit that these crimes happened and share our shame with the world depsite the fact that they never happened in the name or desire of 95% of the population of the Cypriots.
Yet we grudgingly admit to these killings and murders een though we were never taught them. Personally I still find fault of the TC's with a well orchestrated withdrawal from govt that gave our fanatics the perfect signal to carry out their share of horrors. But I could never ever understand the maniacs that committed the crimes that they did against TC civilians. Our biggest mistake as a community was not ignoring both Makarios and Clerides whe they pardoned these bastards and hunt them down ourselves. We should have hung them in ELeftheria Sq for the whole world to see.


The same can be said by the TC's with the activities of the TMT. The ordinary TC never gave a carte blanche to these officers from Turkey who were kidnapping and slaugthering GC's either. This one however gets notched down as self defense. How the hell we've reached a stage where slaughtering and heinous crimes against humanity are excused as self defense is beyond me. (by both sides!!)

The 3rd one is the invasion. This is the Big one for me and the one that baffles me the most. Grown men, educated and with families have sat on their PC's and told the forum that the invasion was a peace intervention to save the GC's and the TC's. They told us how no GC civilians were killed during this even though most of us have family that died in 74. They told us they would never have fired had the GC's not fired back and kept a straight face while those of us who remembered the F5's dropping bombs on the villages read with disbelief. They told us that all our missing where killed by the coup when everyday more and more brave TC's are confessing what their entire village knows, that the well on the mountain contains something more than water. Excuses, more excuses and more excuses....and then I sit and wonder. WHat make s a grown man lie like this in someone else's face when that someone else has obviosuly been affected so much by this?

FOr the life of me the only reason I can find is that its the fear of having your words used against you on a later argument. So we sit here and sell our souls to our own propaganda machine for a lousy argument.

Sorry if I dragged on.


Very well said DT.

Can somebody please tell me what would have happend to he TCs if Turkey did not intervine.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby DT. » Wed Mar 18, 2009 2:44 pm

YFred wrote:
CopperLine wrote:
DT. wrote:
Bananiot wrote:I did not say you did, I mere wantd your comment. In my opinion there is a queue of GC forumers who do not recognise that we did mistakes. Piratis, in his last post, claims that our mistakes were simply political (whatever this means). Thus, Erk´s father who was dragged out of hospital bed, shot and thrown into a well, was just a political (!) mistake, not a crime. Perhaps he means that crimes could be a result of wrong policies but really i cannot follow him on this one. Also, he indirectly accepts that Makarios made mistakes because he was politically uneducated but then, in the same breath, he says that after 1960 he made only one mistake, that of accepting federation. Piratis is one badly confused chap.

Enough on Piratis (bet you he will now resort to his infamous percentages - we killed one you killed tens) let us go back to our original argument. Utu is TC isn´t he? He is rather generous in apportioning blame on his own community and Turkey. We should now see what some GC´s say, besides Piratis. Have we committed any crimes? Which were they? Can we admit to some of them? Is it patriotic to deny them?


I don't think Utu is TC actully. You seem to be stuck on all this admittion of crimes. The GC side can admit, confess and repent for everything those gangs of fanatics committed in the 60's. A situation so dark and badly recorded that sometimes you feel that this period happened in another country and not our own. And yet, we admit to these crimes and take our fair share of what these individuals had done. Careful now, this is the important bit the fact that we admit that these crimes happened and share our shame with the world depsite the fact that they never happened in the name or desire of 95% of the population of the Cypriots.
Yet we grudgingly admit to these killings and murders een though we were never taught them. Personally I still find fault of the TC's with a well orchestrated withdrawal from govt that gave our fanatics the perfect signal to carry out their share of horrors. But I could never ever understand the maniacs that committed the crimes that they did against TC civilians. Our biggest mistake as a community was not ignoring both Makarios and Clerides whe they pardoned these bastards and hunt them down ourselves. We should have hung them in ELeftheria Sq for the whole world to see.


The same can be said by the TC's with the activities of the TMT. The ordinary TC never gave a carte blanche to these officers from Turkey who were kidnapping and slaugthering GC's either. This one however gets notched down as self defense. How the hell we've reached a stage where slaughtering and heinous crimes against humanity are excused as self defense is beyond me. (by both sides!!)

The 3rd one is the invasion. This is the Big one for me and the one that baffles me the most. Grown men, educated and with families have sat on their PC's and told the forum that the invasion was a peace intervention to save the GC's and the TC's. They told us how no GC civilians were killed during this even though most of us have family that died in 74. They told us they would never have fired had the GC's not fired back and kept a straight face while those of us who remembered the F5's dropping bombs on the villages read with disbelief. They told us that all our missing where killed by the coup when everyday more and more brave TC's are confessing what their entire village knows, that the well on the mountain contains something more than water. Excuses, more excuses and more excuses....and then I sit and wonder. WHat make s a grown man lie like this in someone else's face when that someone else has obviosuly been affected so much by this?

FOr the life of me the only reason I can find is that its the fear of having your words used against you on a later argument. So we sit here and sell our souls to our own propaganda machine for a lousy argument.

Sorry if I dragged on.


Very well said DT.

Can somebody please tell me what would have happend to he TCs if Turkey did not intervine.


Supposing you don't believe that the TC's would not had been harmed during the coup which they weren't....what was the reason for the 2nd invasion after constituional order was re-established and Clerides was Acting President.?
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests