Cyprus-Forum.com

[Bananiot]

DT, so you think that only the left is capable of stupidity? Who put is in the non alligned movement, would you like to ponder on this? Today, which section of our society is staunchly anti american? Any idea?

[Get Real!]

...and what my political affiliations are and this manure spreader is still trying to figure out who I am.

Every now and then Bananiot makes me laugh too...

[DT.]

DT, so you think that only the left is capable of stupidity? Who put is in the non alligned movement, would you like to ponder on this? Today, which section of our society is staunchly anti american? Any idea?

Makarios put us in the non-alligned movement if I'm not mistaken and he was voted to power with the help of AKEL.

And no I do not think the left is only capable of stupidity. You are absolutely right on that. The only party that accepted that monstrosity the annan plan was DISY.

[christos1]

So now I am extreme left! I suppose Anastasiades is extreme left too, according to the logic of this Christos moron. How does he know I voted for Christofias? He is smart enough to know that I did not vote for Papadopoulos, it seems, but this is as far his intelligence can take him. Everybody in this forum knows who I am and what my political affiliations are and this manure spreader is still trying to figure out who I am. Unlike the bash patriots who declare their cyber courage at every opportunity but conveniently hide behind nicks, I have had my photo published on the forum several times, even when the witch hunt was on during the ambient bloody atmosphere times of Papadopoulos when "democratic" members of the forum threatened to tell my boss of my heresy.

Come here twit. I recall the first comment you made when i came to this forum. Take a look at it in this thread:

http://www.cyprus-forum.com/cyprus16046-40.html

You were upset that Christofias was forming a coalition with Diko and you stated "I did not vote for Christofias to form a pact with corrupt DIKO". Explain yourself. You wouldnt have made that statement if you voted for kasoulidis. Now dont you try and hide from me. I got you in my crosshairs and i cant wait to read how your going to wiggle out of this one. Amuse me, Bana. AMUSE ME. I am waiting for your reply with great anticipation.

BTW You love the Cyprus Mail so much that you sound like that rasta man Haji Mike. Mike's favorite word is "ambient". You know how little kids learn new words and they cant stop saying the word? Well behold:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&clie ... tnG=Search

Who is this?

I write for the Cyprus Mail. ohh, gimmee a toke of that sh-it you're smokin. Whhhhhh ahhhhhh. the ambiance bla bla bla bla ambient whhhhhhhhhh ahhh Papadopoulos the ambianator bla bla bla. I am a burnt philosopher bla bla bla.

too funny.

[christos1]

The only party that accepted that monstrosity the annan plan was DISY.

Well it wasn't DISY's greatest moment, thats for sure.

[runaway]

But the Greek-majority island is geographically part of Europe and joined the European Union in 2004.

So if South Cyprus, being closer to Africa, is geographically in Europe, so is Turkey.

Don't be so humble. A big important country like Turkey shouldn't need tiny Cyprus to help it define itself of where its place in the world is.

I would like to be humble regarding this. Sarkozy needs very basic if clauses to understand some geography:

If South Cyprus is in EU, it is in Europe.
If South Cyprus is in Europe, Turkey is Europe.

this one is to the Greeks:
If Turkey's Anatolia is called Minor Asia, how come South Cyprus is Europe and what the hell is it doing in EU? Consistency is a virtue.

To be a European country or not is not subject of your boarders or your location. Is subject of values people shared and respect in Europe and in this regard Turkey is some decades behind this target.

Turkey is not Europe,but ,of course,can be

You are perfectly wrong. First condition for EU membership is to have land in Europe. If you admit South Cyprus to EU membership, and question Turkey's Europeanness geographically, you just fool yourself. If being European has nothing to do with borders, then Greeks in Australia should be 28th member and Greeks in USA 29th etc... Oh and don't forget the Philippines, they are Christians as well.

Even your country was next to Luxemburg in the map would not be a European country if it had the same culture and political saystem Turkey has today.You thing Turkey is a European country for the simple reason that you do not understand what a European country is.

You claim to be European just because you are Christian. You don't have any other common point with a person from Luxembourg not geographically nor culturally. In terms of religion, even christianity cant save you. Most of them are probably atheists or dont care about religion's role in society. They are not narrow-minded due to religion and not ruled by priests.

[DT.]

But the Greek-majority island is geographically part of Europe and joined the European Union in 2004.

So if South Cyprus, being closer to Africa, is geographically in Europe, so is Turkey.

Don't be so humble. A big important country like Turkey shouldn't need tiny Cyprus to help it define itself of where its place in the world is.

I would like to be humble regarding this. Sarkozy needs very basic if clauses to understand some geography:

If South Cyprus is in EU, it is in Europe.
If South Cyprus is in Europe, Turkey is Europe.

this one is to the Greeks:
If Turkey's Anatolia is called Minor Asia, how come South Cyprus is Europe and what the hell is it doing in EU? Consistency is a virtue.

To be a European country or not is not subject of your boarders or your location. Is subject of values people shared and respect in Europe and in this regard Turkey is some decades behind this target.

Turkey is not Europe,but ,of course,can be

You are perfectly wrong. First condition for EU membership is to have land in Europe. If you admit South Cyprus to EU membership, and question Turkey's Europeanness geographically, you just fool yourself. If being European has nothing to do with borders, then Greeks in Australia should be 28th member and Greeks in USA 29th etc... Oh and don't forget the Philippines, they are Christians as well.

Even your country was next to Luxemburg in the map would not be a European country if it had the same culture and political saystem Turkey has today.You thing Turkey is a European country for the simple reason that you do not understand what a European country is.

You claim to be European just because you are Christian. You don't have any other common point with a person from Luxembourg not geographically nor culturally. In terms of religion, even christianity cant save you. Most of them are probably atheists or dont care about religion's role in society. They are not narrow-minded due to religion and not ruled by priests.

I need help understanding your tag line on the bottom. Why exactly does North Cyprus belong to the TC's?

[runaway]

But the Greek-majority island is geographically part of Europe and joined the European Union in 2004.

So if South Cyprus, being closer to Africa, is geographically in Europe, so is Turkey.

Don't be so humble. A big important country like Turkey shouldn't need tiny Cyprus to help it define itself of where its place in the world is.

I would like to be humble regarding this. Sarkozy needs very basic if clauses to understand some geography:

If South Cyprus is in EU, it is in Europe.
If South Cyprus is in Europe, Turkey is Europe.

this one is to the Greeks:
If Turkey's Anatolia is called Minor Asia, how come South Cyprus is Europe and what the hell is it doing in EU? Consistency is a virtue.

To be a European country or not is not subject of your boarders or your location. Is subject of values people shared and respect in Europe and in this regard Turkey is some decades behind this target.

Turkey is not Europe,but ,of course,can be

You are perfectly wrong. First condition for EU membership is to have land in Europe. If you admit South Cyprus to EU membership, and question Turkey's Europeanness geographically, you just fool yourself. If being European has nothing to do with borders, then Greeks in Australia should be 28th member and Greeks in USA 29th etc... Oh and don't forget the Philippines, they are Christians as well.

Even your country was next to Luxemburg in the map would not be a European country if it had the same culture and political saystem Turkey has today.You thing Turkey is a European country for the simple reason that you do not understand what a European country is.

You claim to be European just because you are Christian. You don't have any other common point with a person from Luxembourg not geographically nor culturally. In terms of religion, even christianity cant save you. Most of them are probably atheists or dont care about religion's role in society. They are not narrow-minded due to religion and not ruled by priests.

I need help understanding your tag line on the bottom. Why exactly does North Cyprus belong to the TC's?

Don't bother to understand anything. You are so thick you can't even understand where you are situated on the map. Turkey is Minor Asia and South Cyprus is the center of Europe. LOL

[Bananiot]

Hadjimike, moron, is not just a rasta man. He is an accomplished Professor in Sociology and you can bet your bottom dollar the word "ambient" is not new to him.

I do not need to wiggle out of anything, moron, either. If you went back enough you would know that my political affiliations are no secret and that I have stated my views on AKEL on numerous occasions. My first choise in the second round was Kasoulides because I trust Anastasiades more than Christofias, but like many in my party, decided to vote Christofias because had Kasoulides won, AKEL would have regressed to negative party politics, whereas, with Christofias at the helm, I was more confident that DISI would behave sensibly and grand him almost unconditional support to deal with the Cyprus issue. I believe I have been proved correct here. If your issue is with the extremists on the political spectrum, I would suggest you look for them in national socialist EDEK, DIKO and EVROKO.

DT, Makarios was not voted in by AKEL when he opted for the non alligned. AKEL stood against him in 1960. Makarios was a megalomaniac, basically, who thought he could mess about with the west, in order to gain leverage (and personal prestige probably) by blackmailing the powers that controlled the Eastern Mediterranean.

About the Annan Plan. Just wait for a bit longer when we will be begging to be given another chance ...

[YFred]

Hadjimike, moron, is not just a rasta man. He is an accomplished Professor in Sociology and you can bet your bottom dollar the word "ambient" is not new to him.

I do not need to wiggle out of anything, moron, either. If you went back enough you would know that my political affiliations are no secret and that I have stated my views on AKEL on numerous occasions. My first choise in the second round was Kasoulides because I trust Anastasiades more than Christofias, but like many in my party, decided to vote Christofias because had Kasoulides won, AKEL would have regressed to negative party politics, whereas, with Christofias at the helm, I was more confident that DISI would behave sensibly and grand him almost unconditional support to deal with the Cyprus issue. I believe I have been proved correct here. If your issue is with the extremists on the political spectrum, I would suggest you look for them in national socialist EDEK, DIKO and EVROKO.

DT, Makarios was not voted in by AKEL when he opted for the non alligned. AKEL stood against him in 1960. Makarios was a megalomaniac, basically, who thought he could mess about with the west, in order to gain leverage (and personal prestige probably) by blackmailing the powers that controlled the Eastern Mediterranean.

About the Annan Plan. Just wait for a bit longer when we will be begging to be given another chance ...

I am glad you said that Bananiot. I now know why I like his artciles.
What a light for humanity.