The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Treaty of Guarantee Fact Sheet

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Get Real! » Tue Mar 10, 2009 7:10 pm

insan wrote:
DT. wrote:whose being suspicious? You're asking for a foreign power to invade anytime in our country and I'm being suspicious?


As usual u r confusing intervention with invasion. Had 40.000(NG+Eldyk+reservists) of Hellenic forces not resisted and engaged into a combat with Turkish forces; the intervention of Turkey would have been limited with those irrregular guerillas of EOKA-B.

Never assume that all that was being said during a 70s phone conversation represents fact.
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby insan » Tue Mar 10, 2009 7:14 pm

Get Real! wrote:
insan wrote:
DT. wrote:whose being suspicious? You're asking for a foreign power to invade anytime in our country and I'm being suspicious?


As usual u r confusing intervention with invasion. Had 40.000(NG+Eldyk+reservists) of Hellenic forces not resisted and engaged into a combat with Turkish forces; the intervention of Turkey would have been limited with those irrregular guerillas of EOKA-B.

Never assume that all that was being said during a 70s phone conversation represents fact.


It's not an assumption based on phone converstaions of the 70s. It's a factual examination of the events of 1973-1976 based on 400 pages of CIA report.
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby YFred » Tue Mar 10, 2009 7:18 pm

insan wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
insan wrote:
DT. wrote:whose being suspicious? You're asking for a foreign power to invade anytime in our country and I'm being suspicious?


As usual u r confusing intervention with invasion. Had 40.000(NG+Eldyk+reservists) of Hellenic forces not resisted and engaged into a combat with Turkish forces; the intervention of Turkey would have been limited with those irrregular guerillas of EOKA-B.

Never assume that all that was being said during a 70s phone conversation represents fact.


It's not an assumption based on phone converstaions of the 70s. It's a factual examination of the events of 1973-1976 based on 400 pages of CIA report.

Insan back to school. Did you for one moment actually think that our GR woul accept such a thing as a credible source. Has it got Hellenism right through it as a watermark, because if it hasn't I am affraid it is not acceptable. :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby insan » Tue Mar 10, 2009 7:23 pm

YFred wrote:
insan wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
insan wrote:
DT. wrote:whose being suspicious? You're asking for a foreign power to invade anytime in our country and I'm being suspicious?


As usual u r confusing intervention with invasion. Had 40.000(NG+Eldyk+reservists) of Hellenic forces not resisted and engaged into a combat with Turkish forces; the intervention of Turkey would have been limited with those irrregular guerillas of EOKA-B.

Never assume that all that was being said during a 70s phone conversation represents fact.


It's not an assumption based on phone converstaions of the 70s. It's a factual examination of the events of 1973-1976 based on 400 pages of CIA report.

Insan back to school. Did you for one moment actually think that our GR woul accept such a thing as a credible source. Has it got Hellenism right through it as a watermark, because if it hasn't I am affraid it is not acceptable. :lol: :lol: :lol:


:lol: :lol:
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby Oracle » Tue Mar 10, 2009 8:15 pm

YFred wrote:
RAFAELLA wrote:
YFred wrote:
RAFAELLA wrote:"When the Turkish teacher/ leader etc says the colour of milk is black, some fools start wondering if it really is black. So they go check it and what a surprise man: It is not black it is white! Then the Turkish teacher/ leader etc comes back and says you have to look at it with closed eyes. Then the fools go look at it and.... hey the Turkish teacher/ leader is right. The colour of milk is black!!! "
Then they start arguing to define milk as being equally black and equally white.

Is that the Glapsides beach or Salamis in the background of that lovely picture?


My destroyed home town. Silent for 35 years due to the turkish occupation.

Image

Iy you owned all that you must be TPapa's relation.


Your ignorance is excusable; your rudeness, cruelty and dishonesty are not!
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby YFred » Tue Mar 10, 2009 8:26 pm

Oracle wrote:
YFred wrote:
RAFAELLA wrote:
YFred wrote:
RAFAELLA wrote:"When the Turkish teacher/ leader etc says the colour of milk is black, some fools start wondering if it really is black. So they go check it and what a surprise man: It is not black it is white! Then the Turkish teacher/ leader etc comes back and says you have to look at it with closed eyes. Then the fools go look at it and.... hey the Turkish teacher/ leader is right. The colour of milk is black!!! "
Then they start arguing to define milk as being equally black and equally white.

Is that the Glapsides beach or Salamis in the background of that lovely picture?


My destroyed home town. Silent for 35 years due to the turkish occupation.

Image

Iy you owned all that you must be TPapa's relation.


Your ignorance is excusable; your rudeness, cruelty and dishonesty are not!

You can talk! She is not the only one that lost property. Some of us have lost properties.

You will find me very calculatingly reciprocating when I post. I would never be cruel or any other thing to anybody, who is not the same to the TCs and their plight.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby Simon » Tue Mar 10, 2009 8:40 pm

Even the United Nations has called Turkey's invasion 'illegal'. The facts are there for all to see. The Treaty speaks for itself. So I really can't see any point in arguing about this, as Turkey does not respect international law anyway. Simple as that. Signing any agreement with Turkey is rather pointless, as they come up with ever more imaginative ways of interpreting it so as to suit its interests.
User avatar
Simon
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1955
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 5:47 pm

Postby insan » Tue Mar 10, 2009 8:58 pm

Simon wrote:Even the United Nations has called Turkey's invasion 'illegal'. The facts are there for all to see. The Treaty speaks for itself. So I really can't see any point in arguing about this, as Turkey does not respect international law anyway. Simple as that. Signing any agreement with Turkey is rather pointless, as they come up with ever more imaginative ways of interpreting it so as to suit its interests.


Yeah, just for the sake of keeping Greece in NATO...
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby Oracle » Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:08 pm

insan wrote:
Simon wrote:Even the United Nations has called Turkey's invasion 'illegal'. The facts are there for all to see. The Treaty speaks for itself. So I really can't see any point in arguing about this, as Turkey does not respect international law anyway. Simple as that. Signing any agreement with Turkey is rather pointless, as they come up with ever more imaginative ways of interpreting it so as to suit its interests.


Yeah, just for the sake of keeping Greece in NATO...


And what do they offer to keep Turkey in NATO? ... or does Turkey beg and pay to be kept in? :lol:
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby insan » Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:49 pm

Oracle wrote:
insan wrote:
Simon wrote:Even the United Nations has called Turkey's invasion 'illegal'. The facts are there for all to see. The Treaty speaks for itself. So I really can't see any point in arguing about this, as Turkey does not respect international law anyway. Simple as that. Signing any agreement with Turkey is rather pointless, as they come up with ever more imaginative ways of interpreting it so as to suit its interests.


Yeah, just for the sake of keeping Greece in NATO...


And what do they offer to keep Turkey in NATO? ... or does Turkey beg and pay to be kept in? :lol:


They promised Turkey to fix Cyprus problem on the basis of Turkish thesis after finishing their job on Balkans. :lol: First attempt was Annan Plan but failed. We r impatiently waiting for the second attempt. :wink:
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest