The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Today is the 45th anniversary of the Baf (Paphos) Resistance

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Ierini-Baris » Mon Mar 09, 2009 7:30 pm

DT. wrote:
Ierini-Baris wrote:
DT. wrote:
halil wrote:
Ierini-Baris wrote:See Halil what kind of productive debate can be expected from a thread like this ?


Yes indeed Baris ,

i knew what will come out ..... these are proofs that both sides are suffered in Cyprus .....The Cyprus problem did not started as their saying .... Turkey invade the island and occupied 1/3 of the island .
and all our problems are after 74 .

It is started after 13 points forcement over TC's to except how they wanna get the control of the Cyprus . İt was the plan to break up equal partnership of the 2 sides .


want to talk about your plan for taksim sine the 50's halil or did that plan suddenly die in 1960? What were tc ministers doing with the circular from denktash and kutchuk? Why where they ready to depart from govt so easily?


As with all cases this has two different views and like most cases both of them are true. Some ministers were ready to depart from the goverment with the idea of Taksim in mind but the others who wanted to attend were excriminated and their right to attend were taken from their hands.Also even If the ones that wanted taksim were ready to depart it was the idea of Enosis and the actions that were well planned to lead to Enosis that gave them the chance and excuse to depart !!!


So the proposals were a ploy for enosis? That what you were saying?

Do you remember why the proposals were made? Do you remember how the tc ministers bankrupted the govt by refusing to vote for the tax bill until the unworkable municipality bill was enforced?


Irrelevant whenever you do not like anything in the posts you include extra information to make you right...You well know Makarios ideas better than I do..I agree there were problems in the goverment but the change in constitutions was not due to that.You have admitted it many times .That you were the majority and wanted Enosis and it was your right..What happened now that you started talking about different points.
? Addition of different topics to debate just as a show of your knowldge does not make you right !!!
Ierini-Baris
Member
Member
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:04 pm

Postby DT. » Wed Mar 11, 2009 10:43 am

Ierini-Baris wrote:
DT. wrote:
Ierini-Baris wrote:
DT. wrote:
halil wrote:
Ierini-Baris wrote:See Halil what kind of productive debate can be expected from a thread like this ?


Yes indeed Baris ,

i knew what will come out ..... these are proofs that both sides are suffered in Cyprus .....The Cyprus problem did not started as their saying .... Turkey invade the island and occupied 1/3 of the island .
and all our problems are after 74 .

It is started after 13 points forcement over TC's to except how they wanna get the control of the Cyprus . İt was the plan to break up equal partnership of the 2 sides .


want to talk about your plan for taksim sine the 50's halil or did that plan suddenly die in 1960? What were tc ministers doing with the circular from denktash and kutchuk? Why where they ready to depart from govt so easily?


As with all cases this has two different views and like most cases both of them are true. Some ministers were ready to depart from the goverment with the idea of Taksim in mind but the others who wanted to attend were excriminated and their right to attend were taken from their hands.Also even If the ones that wanted taksim were ready to depart it was the idea of Enosis and the actions that were well planned to lead to Enosis that gave them the chance and excuse to depart !!!


So the proposals were a ploy for enosis? That what you were saying?

Do you remember why the proposals were made? Do you remember how the tc ministers bankrupted the govt by refusing to vote for the tax bill until the unworkable municipality bill was enforced?


Irrelevant whenever you do not like anything in the posts you include extra information to make you right...You well know Makarios ideas better than I do..I agree there were problems in the goverment but the change in constitutions was not due to that.You have admitted it many times .That you were the majority and wanted Enosis and it was your right..What happened now that you started talking about different points.
? Addition of different topics to debate just as a show of your knowldge does not make you right !!!


You said the plans were to lead to enosis.

I replied to give you the practical reasons behind the proposed amendments. Why can't you discuss it?
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Previous

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests