The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Turkish Cypriots executed 22 GC innocent civilians in Aug 74

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Piratis » Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:54 pm

Viewpoint wrote:
Piratis wrote:
insan wrote:
Piratis wrote:
insan wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
insan wrote:As i told previously, u should have prayed that Turkish army hadn't launched a 3rd phase of intervention in order to ward off all those EOKA-B guerillas.

It's the Turkish Cypriots that had comitted these attrocities and many others in 1974.

And by the same token...YOU should pray that the National Guard doesn't turn Kyrenia into glass in the future with all this incriminating evidence being dug up all the time, and the treasonous games your foolish leaders STILL keep playing despite the fact that they can’t even afford to buy a new pair of knickers, let alone play "power games"! :roll:


I'm not trying to justify what some groups of TC extremists or idiots or lunatics did but most probably the 11 years lasted, "RoC" originated physical and psychologic oppression caused them to went berserk. How else could it be explained? Could a mentally healthy person commit such an atrocity? :roll:


Then I hope you can understand the psychological condition of the native Cypriot people after being oppressed and murdered by the 10s of thousands by foreign invaders for centuries.

If you think that because you suffered for a decade during a conflict which you started in 1958, that gives you the right to kill 1000s, ethnically cleanse 100s of thousands and steal our lands, then I hope you will give the same excuse, multiplied by 30, to the native Cypriots who suffered under your oppressive rule not for 10 but for 300 years.

So if one action can excuse a reaction, then who is to blame is the one who started it all. And that is the Turks, in 1571, when the attacked and oppressed Cypriots for centuries, without previously the Cypriots harming the Turks in any way.


I acknowledge ur rightousness to a degree. However we had really no other options. Either we would accept minority status and let ourselves into a darksome future in our homeland Cyprus or we would struggle to create ourselves a safe territory to survive by fair means or foul. :roll:


What you say does not excuse you initial attack and the first 300 years of oppression against us though. It really was not our fault that your minority was created on our island and that you could not accept that Cyprus could be ruled democratically.

Furthermore your survival was not under threat. I many times gave you the Turkish minority of Rhodes as an example. Rhodes united with Greece in 1947 and the Turkish minority was not annihilated as your imaginary scenarios would have as believe.

Just like Cyprus was under the Ottoman and later British empires, against the will of Cypriots and with Cypriots being the subjects of those empires, instead Cyprus would be part of the Greek Republic, and Cypriots equal citizens of the Greek Republic, something that the vast majority of Cypriots wanted. GCs, TCs and the other minorities would continue to live in Cyprus just like they did under British or Ottoman Empires. (without you having any Ottoman Style privileges on our expense of course)

So don't create baseless unrealistic scenarios in order to excuse your attacks against us.


Could you please supply population figures of Turks in both Rhodes and Crete after the became part of Greece.


The figures for Rhodes are given by your friend Insan. Around 4000 when Rhodes united with Greece in 1947, around 5000 today - a 20% increase in population. And that is without the addition of Turkish Settlers.

Compare that with your population after 1974. Many TCs emigrated abroad and many continue to do so. Today the real TCs in Cyprus are less than what they used to be in the 50s and 60s.

So if instead of war and conflict you had accepted that Cypriots could decide the destiny of their own island in a democratic and peaceful way, and Cyprus united with Greece just as Rhodes did, then not only you would not have been annihilated, but your population would be higher.

Crete was part of Greece during the 1923 Exchange of Populations Agreement between Greece and Turkey. During the exchange 500.000 Turks moved from Greece (including Crete) to Turkey, and three times more, 1.500.000 Greeks moved from Turkey to Greece.

Since then, the minority of Turks that remained in Greece kept increasing, while the minority of Greeks that remained in Turkey is almost totally annihilated.

The Turks and other Muslims of Western Thrace were exempted from this transfer as well as the Greeks of Istanbul and the Aegean Islands of Imbros (Gökçeada) and Tenedos (Bozcaada). Due to punitive measures carried out by the Republic of Turkey, such as the 1932 parliamentary law which barred Greek citizens in Turkey from a series of 30 trades and professions from tailor and carpenter to medicine, law, and real estate,[8] the Greek population of Istanbul began to decline, as evidenced by demographic statistics. The Varlık Vergisi capital gains tax imposed in 1942 on wealthy non-Muslims in Turkey also served to reduce the economic potential of ethnic Greek businesspeople in Turkey. Furthermore, violent incidents as the Istanbul Pogrom (1955) directed against the ethnic Greek community greatly accelerated emigration of Greeks, reducing the 200,000-strong Greek minority in 1924 to just over 5,000 in 2005.[9] By contrast the Muslim community of Greece has increased in size to over 100,000 since the signing of the Lausane Treaty, while Greece is also host to tens of thousands of Muslim immigrants.


Here is the ethnic distribution in 1911, before the exchange:

http://www.emersonkent.com/images/balka ... r_1911.jpg
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby Gabira » Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:57 pm

You can sit back and take a breather now Booms, mama has come to tighten your loosened training wheels.

Oracle wrote:Yes there is a lot of difference between those, and what is posted here, with supporting eye-witness accounts, which you choose to label as lies.


"I choose to label as lies" :roll:
I have no control over how you perceive of my open ended questions. They are your words and not mine. There was no intended malice in my questions, I promise :?

Oracle wrote:Well where is your evidence that the eye-witness was lying? Is it enough that it's because you just say so? ... Go on Gabira, keep filling in the gaps with your crap .... Never has a statement been more apt, in describing what you do ! So, thanks for reminding everyone by adopting it as your signature!


Allegations have been made through this article. I have asked some reasonable and fair open ended questions in relation to the allegations to provoke discussion. My questions have been in line and of similar nature to questions that GC's haved asked when countering TC allegations, articles or posts.

It is not for me to prove if the 'eye witness' was lying or not. I wasn't there to confirm or deny the validity of the allegations towards TC's. I have asked a few questions about the identity of the murderers. As you unfairly suggest, I didn't call the 'eye witness' a liar, they are your words, not mine.
User avatar
Gabira
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 365
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 11:25 am
Location: In Your Greek Veins.

Postby boulio » Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:04 pm

turks od the dodecanese:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turks_of_the_Dodecanese

there are aslo 2,000 in kos,i also believe there is a small community in karpathos and kalimnos of about 500-1,000

the turks of crete:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cretan_Turks
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Postby runaway » Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:09 pm

boulio wrote:turks od the dodecanese:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turks_of_the_Dodecanese

there are aslo 2,000 in kos,i also believe there is a small community in karpathos and kalimnos of about 500-1,000

the turks of crete:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cretan_Turks


Nice to hear that. Now it is time for Greece to recognize the TURKISH minority in the country.
User avatar
runaway
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1723
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:41 pm
Location: Istanbul

Postby paliometoxo » Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:11 pm

right after turkey recognises their minority
User avatar
paliometoxo
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8837
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 3:55 pm
Location: Nicosia, paliometocho

Postby boulio » Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:21 pm

Sure once turkey allows the Island of Imvros and tenedos(gokceada and bozcadda)local christian administration.
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Postby Oracle » Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:27 pm

Gabira wrote:You can sit back and take a breather now Booms, mama has come to tighten your loosened training wheels.

Oracle wrote:Yes there is a lot of difference between those, and what is posted here, with supporting eye-witness accounts, which you choose to label as lies.


"I choose to label as lies" :roll:
I have no control over how you perceive of my open ended questions. They are your words and not mine. There was no intended malice in my questions, I promise :?

Oracle wrote:Well where is your evidence that the eye-witness was lying? Is it enough that it's because you just say so? ... Go on Gabira, keep filling in the gaps with your crap .... Never has a statement been more apt, in describing what you do ! So, thanks for reminding everyone by adopting it as your signature!


Allegations have been made through this article. I have asked some reasonable and fair open ended questions in relation to the allegations to provoke discussion. My questions have been in line and of similar nature to questions that GC's haved asked when countering TC allegations, articles or posts.

It is not for me to prove if the 'eye witness' was lying or not. I wasn't there to confirm or deny the validity of the allegations towards TC's. I have asked a few questions about the identity of the murderers. As you unfairly suggest, I didn't call the 'eye witness' a liar, they are your words, not mine.


Well you did edit your post .... :wink:

But your forgot this one:

Gabira wrote:As far as I am concerned, this whole article could be fabricated.


Pretty accusatory to use such a strong term as fabricated and condemning everyone associated with the article, including the eye-witness!

So as I said, you just keep filling in the gaps with crap ....
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Piratis » Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:29 pm

runaway wrote:
boulio wrote:turks od the dodecanese:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turks_of_the_Dodecanese

there are aslo 2,000 in kos,i also believe there is a small community in karpathos and kalimnos of about 500-1,000

the turks of crete:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cretan_Turks


Nice to hear that. Now it is time for Greece to recognize the TURKISH minority in the country.


According to the Treaty of Lausanne (1923) The Muslim/Turkish minority Greece is officially recognized as Muslim, not Turkish.

Turkey didn't respect the agreements in that treaty, and the Greek minority in Turky is almost totally annihilated. On the contrary Greece respected that treaty, and her Muslim/Turkish minority has grown in size.

The Turks, after annihilating almost all the Greeks from Turkey in violation of the Treaty of Lausanne, they came and they want for their minority in Greece even more rights!

I am not against the right of that minority to be called as they wish. But I point out how the Turks demand every drop of their rights, even those which are not given to them by agreements, but when it comes to others, they don't even give them their basic human rights, not even the right to exist!

Also, it is funny that Turks do remember the treaty of Lausanne when it suits them:

Deputy Prime Minister Devlet Bahceli on Saturday said Turkey could not grant minority status to Kurds because that would legitimate the separatist war waged by Kurdish rebels.

Kurdish guerrilla leader Abdullah Ocalan – sentenced to hang for treason last year – has from his jail cell ordered his fighters to cease fire and instead wage a peaceful campaign for cultural rights for the country's 12 million Kurds.

The European Union has urged Turkish authorities to ease restrictions on the use of Kurdish language in education and broadcasting and improve its checkered human rights record as a step towards EU membership.

Turkey has so far refused, saying Kurds enjoy equal rights with Turks before the law. Only non-Muslims have minority status in Turkey under the 1923 Lausanne Agreement and rights such as that of education in their own languages.

"It is impossible for us to accept such an approach which on ethnic basis could justify a terror movement... by producing a new minority concept that goes beyond the minority description made by the Lausanne Agreement," the nationalist Bahceli told mainstream daily Hurriyet in an interview published on Saturday.

Bahceli's conservative coalition partners appear to take a softer line on Kurdish cultural rights. Conservative Mesut Yilmaz, coordinator for Turkey's EU membership bid, said last week that now that "terrorism" was over Ankara could take unprecedented steps.

Ocalan's Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) fought for self-rule in the mountainous southeast for 15 years, in a conflict that cost over 30,000 lives. Fighting has now largely ended.

Bahceli said there was no ban on using Kurdish in daily life but he opposed any further moves such as officially allowing education in Kurdish. "That would mean handing down what the PKK has been seeking for years as middle term goals in order to reach its final target," he was quoted as saying by the daily.

The Nationalist Action Party leader also objects to abolishing the death penalty, saying that would save Ocalan's neck. Scrapping it is a condition of EU membership.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby runaway » Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:31 pm

paliometoxo wrote:right after turkey recognises their minority


right after?? Greece shoud have done it way before entering EU. Greece does not respect minority rights and is not critisized by EU. Such a hypocrisy!
User avatar
runaway
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1723
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:41 pm
Location: Istanbul

Postby insan » Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:33 pm

DT. wrote:22 inncocens placed in front of the firing squad. The youngest being 2 years old and we're talking about the understandable phsycological state of the executioners?

When things like this are posted for your information Insan, you read it...you digest it...you bow your head and curse the killers....then you try to move on with the knowledge.

You do this no matter what community the killers blonged to.

You don't try to excuse the pshycological reasons of these son's of bitches when they were executing children with a phrase "most probably the 11 years lasted, "RoC" originated physical and psychologic oppression caused them to went berserk."

Here's hoping they experience a slow painful death.


I could behave how u described but it's the simplest. Since the main theme of this sad incident is to learn from our mistakes we need to examine it by going to it's roots. It was me again emphisizing that EOKA-B issue should be examined on the basis of ideology, criminology and the then circumstances. My unconventional attitude towards these type of incidents might sounds weird and incomprehensible to u but this is my personality.
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests