insan wrote:Prove me with a credible evidence that private + state land ownership/share of TCs is 12.3%. According to TC soces it's around 29.2%.
Viewpoint wrote:An independent committee can evaluate and decide claims, but Im pretty certain GCs would be against this?
insan wrote:when Ottomans ceded Cyprus to Brits, the Ottoman muslim population constituted 1/3 of island population. Land belongs to Turkish Cypriots could not be less than %30 but could be more because before Brits take the rule of Cyprus, rulers were Ottoman Turks.
Kikapu wrote:insan wrote:Kikapu wrote:insan wrote:Get Real! wrote:YFred wrote:Sotos wrote:The other is called give and take.
You mean GCs to give and TCs to take so the TCs will go from 18% of land to 30%?
You either think you are so clever or you think I am stupid.
Let me explain.
Let us assume that I have 1 donum in the south worth 100,000 and you expect me to exchange that with 1 donum in Karpaz worth 1000. Who is stealing who's land?
You thieving sod.
Look fool, you were a MINORITY of 18% and only owned around 12% of land so any notion that you can “exchange” land with the Greek Cypriots is a joke.
To each his own Kochan…
Prove me with a credible evidence that private + state land ownership/share of TCs is 12.3%. According to TC soces it's around 29.2%.
Do the TC's have the DEEDS to prove this claim, or is it only because Annan Plan said so.?
I can see Insane scoring another "own goal" here.!
Pick-a-boo the staphilynoidea ; when Ottomans ceded Cyprus to Brits, the Ottoman muslim population constituted 1/3 of island population. Land belongs to Turkish Cypriots could not be less than %30 but could be more because before Brits take the rule of Cyprus, rulers were Ottoman Turks.
I think with this u scored a few dozens of goal into your own goal post
So, the simple answer to my question without all the other nonsense you wrote, the answer is NO, the TC's do not have DEEDS to prove their claim.!
Insane, if we were to take your silly reasoning, does that not mean then, that since before 1571 there were NO Ottomans in Cyprus, therefore all 100% of the land should go to the GC's.! Why do you arbitrarily only go back only as far as when the Brits came and the Ottos left.? Sorry Insane, but your reasoning is sillier than you I'm afraid. Either put up the proof of ownership or shut it up.!
Just one more point. If the Ottos were the occupiers of the whole island, why would there have been any reason to have direct ownership of any land. They believed they owned the whole island as conquerors, and when they left as losers, they lost the whole island. Perhaps only after the Brits arrived, that the remaining Ottos in Cyprus actually started owning land.....legally, or else the Brits would have given them their 30% from day one as you claimed. Man, which ever propaganda school you went to, must have passed out graduation diplomas like candy to kids. Do you ever stop and think in what you write:? That was a rhetorical question.!
Now, this really is an "OWN GOAL" with EPIC proportions.!:lol:
Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:An independent committee can evaluate and decide claims, but Im pretty certain GCs would be against this?
Do you want a committee to decide if your house legally belongs to you or not.?
I'm sure, as soon as you provide the proof what they need from you, the deeds, it will be determined that that house belongs to you, so let the committee check everyone’s deeds.!
You will agree to this arrangement, right. VP.?
Get Real! wrote:insan wrote:Prove me with a credible evidence that private + state land ownership/share of TCs is 12.3%. According to TC soces it's around 29.2%.
There are no "TC sources" for that except for bollocks!
http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... ge5105.htm
insan wrote:Get Real! wrote:insan wrote:Prove me with a credible evidence that private + state land ownership/share of TCs is 12.3%. According to TC soces it's around 29.2%.
There are no "TC sources" for that except for bollocks!
http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... ge5105.htm
That is exactly what the Hellenist, propagandist, Prof. Dr. galimatias lover Gene Rossides claims. He has zero credibility.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest