Cyprus-Forum.com

[magikthrill]

“the return of Greek Cypriot property in the Turkish north” = Turks go back to enclaves = 63 –74

i thought these enclaves were in the north so as to prepare partition.


[/quote]
’” end to Turkey's rights as a guarantor country”. = no protection for Tcs = 63-74
[/quote]

and whose gonna protect the GCs?????


[/quote]
And the bit I missed was the spirit.

We saw spirit under Makarios and it didn’t amount to much. Now we got Paps (no tc’s killed 63-74). Great spirit huh?

Quantify spirit[/quote]

after his 13 pts makarios was of the few politicians who did show good will into solving the problem. as mu8ch as i hate to admit it cause i hate the guy because hes a priest and shouldnt have been a politician.

[metecyp]

i thought these enclaves were in the north so as to prepare partition.

How did you think that? Because MicAtCyp suggested so? You know he's the expert in TC history!! You really dont have any clue...

[magikthrill]

actually micatcyps posts are usually too long for me. i get my infromation from various sources.

how many enclaves were there in the south and how many in the north? maybe you can tell us all wise one mete

[metecyp]

how many enclaves were there in the south and how many in the north? maybe you can tell us all wise one mete

There were enclaves both in the north and in the south. They were mainly formed due to GC attacks against TCs. Erol and others discussed this a lot so I'm not going to repeat the discussion here.

[erolz]

after his 13 pts makarios was of the few politicians who did show good will into solving the problem. as mu8ch as i hate to admit it cause i hate the guy because hes a priest and shouldnt have been a politician.

What absolute baloney!

[suetoniuspaulinus]

“the return of Greek Cypriot property in the Turkish north” = Turks go back to enclaves = 63 –74

i thought these enclaves were in the north so as to prepare partition.

’” end to Turkey's rights as a guarantor country”. = no protection for Tcs = 63-74
[/quote]

and whose gonna protect the GCs?????


[/quote]
And the bit I missed was the spirit.

We saw spirit under Makarios and it didn’t amount to much. Now we got Paps (no tc’s killed 63-74). Great spirit huh?

Quantify spirit[/quote]

after his 13 pts makarios was of the few politicians who did show good will into solving the problem. as mu8ch as i hate to admit it cause i hate the guy because hes a priest and shouldnt have been a politician.[/quote]

Mr magikthrill

I, also, would have thought that since the enclave were supposed to have been planned by TMT to assist in the future "TAKSIM" of Cyprus that most if not all would have been in the North. About 40 miles from Turkey.

This was clearly not the case. Could some of our GC friends be suggestinf untruths?? Or am I just reading too much into what some of these posts contain?

AND I nearly agree with some of you other points as well.

[magikthrill]

after his 13 pts makarios was of the few politicians who did show good will into solving the problem. as mu8ch as i hate to admit it cause i hate the guy because hes a priest and shouldnt have been a politician.

What absolute baloney!

bologna

let me rephrase it "compared to every other politician, Makarios did show good will to solve the problem" moreso cleaning up after his mess.

makarios never showed any intention of eliminating the TCs from Cyprus in any way. he just thought the 1960 agreements were unfair. after he saw the chaos that was created i believe he showed extraordinary diplomatic skills in trying to solve the problem.

[erolz]

let me rephrase it "compared to every other politician, Makarios did show good will to solve the problem" moreso cleaning up after his mess.

makarios never showed any intention of eliminating the TCs from Cyprus in any way. he just thought the 1960 agreements were unfair. after he saw the chaos that was created i believe he showed extraordinary diplomatic skills in trying to solve the problem.

Let me rephrase it

What baloney!

[magikthrill]

Let me rephrase it

What baloney!

and let me correct you again: its spelled BOLOGNA

also would you care to elaborate or just stick to that.

[erolz]

and let me correct you again: its spelled BOLOGNA

better correct these people too

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=baloney

also would you care to elaborate or just stick to that.

Given it apparently makes not one iota of differnce if I explain my views, why I hold them and the evidence I have that supports them or not - no I do not really care to elaborate.