metecyp wrote:Well, Kifeas, gabaston might have misunderstood TPap's proposals but tell me, do you think TPaps proposals are realistic? Do you think expecting return of all properties is realistic? How can you talk about bizonal federation and ask for return of all properties? How can you ask for return of all Turkish soldiers and on top of that asking for removal of Turkish guarantees? This shows that he really doesnt care if TCs have security problems or not.
Denktash used to do the same thing, ask for the moon so he could get more in the end. Same goes for TPap.
First of all we have to be careful when commenting on anything regarding what has been discussed between Papadopoullos and others with the UN envoys, because we do not know yet the exact content of these proximity discussions.
No I do not agree that it is realistic to expect complete and full restoration of all GC properties in the north, back to the GCs. I also do not believe that Papadopoullos has made such proposals. The property issue is indeed very complicated and I honestly do not have a clue yet as to which way Papadopoullos has addressed it. What I know is that the property provisions of the last A-plan (in fact in all A-plan versions,) is totally unacceptable from a GC perspective.
Regarding security, Papadopoullos suggests alternative ways in which the TC security concerns will be addressed. They should involve the UN or the E.U., presumably under the context of the E.U. army establishment treaty, but which will not necessarily exclude Turkey, except the right of unilateral intervention. I do not see how the TC security concerns cannot be met under any such context.
Hopefully some time in the future, when the trust between the Two communities is fully restored, we can speak about a common Cypriot army which can replace any other third party involvement on that issue.