Cyprus-Forum.com

[Oracle]

Darwin fails to explain why some apes “evolved” into humans while the rest did not and are still apes!

Is it an evolution of species or an evolution of some individuals of that species? The whole theory falls flat on its face from this alone!

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/

Read it and all your questions will be answered.

On the other hand Creationism can not be supported with any scientific or logical arguments.

Piratis is not a chimp or a ape, he is a ROBOT. created by man

Funny you should say that, but a current hypothesis is that the highest developed form of mankind, Homo evolutis, which we are expecting to emerge any moment now, and may well be amongst us, will be an evolutionarily controlled combination of man and robot.

So if you are equating Piratis with being a thinking (since he niggles you, and you get upset by the thinking process ), feeling (since he distinguishes between right and wrong, and it bothers you) robot, you are paying him a compliment.

I wish I was robotic ....

[lovernomore]

Darwin fails to explain why some apes “evolved” into humans while the rest did not and are still apes!

Is it an evolution of species or an evolution of some individuals of that species? The whole theory falls flat on its face from this alone!

Why don't you explain to us peasants your theories then mate !!
ps.Don't blame Darwin for not publishing links .

maybe he can also axpalin how and who can cerate such arshole like Piratis. My thory is he is craetion of man, microchip and software. A ROBOT.

[Get Real!]

Darwin fails to explain why some apes “evolved” into humans while the rest did not and are still apes!

Is it an evolution of species or an evolution of some individuals of that species? The whole theory falls flat on its face from this alone!

Why don't you explain to us peasants your theories then mate !!
ps.Don't blame Darwin for not publishing links .

Sure! My theory is simple... you're just a useless peasant who should be arrested, bound, castrated, and eternally confined.

[CopperLine]

Darwin fails to explain why some apes “evolved” into humans while the rest did not and are still apes!

Is it an evolution of species or an evolution of some individuals of that species? The whole theory falls flat on its face from this alone!

Darwin does not 'fail to explain ...' because Darwin does not purport to explain the 'evolution' or development of individuals. It is a theory of evolution by means of natural selection of species. Using essentially the same logic but at the genetic level we have Dawkins' innovations, but again these are not explanations of individual change.

[Oracle]

Darwin fails to explain why some apes “evolved” into humans while the rest did not and are still apes!

Is it an evolution of species or an evolution of some individuals of that species? The whole theory falls flat on its face from this alone!

Darwin does not 'fail to explain ...' because Darwin does not purport to explain the 'evolution' or development of individuals. It is a theory of evolution by means of natural selection of species. Using essentially the same logic but at the genetic level we have Dawkins' innovations, but again these are not explanations of individual change.

Hhmm ... We seem to have, above, a selection of the blind leading the blind

Can anyone explain what CopperLine is trying to say?

[yialousa1971]

Darwin fails to explain why some apes “evolved” into humans while the rest did not and are still apes!

Is it an evolution of species or an evolution of some individuals of that species? The whole theory falls flat on its face from this alone!

Why don't you explain to us peasants your theories then mate !!
ps.Don't blame Darwin for not publishing links .

Sure! My theory is simple... you're just a useless peasant who should be arrested, bound, castrated, and eternally confined.

Now that I must agree with.

[Bananiot]

I will help you oracle. Copperline is saying that you and Turks have the same ancestor. In your case, evolution lost its way, somehow.

[Oracle]

I will help you oracle. Copperline is saying that you and Turks have the same ancestor. In your case, evolution lost its way, somehow.

Here you go again .... confusing Evolution with something that has a teleological purpose. Something that led to you, surely didn't know what it was doing

[Bananiot]

I am not confusing anything, I cannot help it if you cannot see what I told you many times before. Evolution takes place despite natural selection, which in your case, quite accidentally, produced an evolutionary biologist who takes pride in the church which staunchly opposes the teaching of evolution to our tragic children.

[Oracle]

P.S.

I am not one of those apologists for the Turks like Bananiot, who think that Turks are less than Human, inferior and disadvantaged as members of Humanity and so need special favours from the more gifted Humans (like Bananiot) who in their mighty Charity as superior Beings, help the poor evolutionarily-stunted Turks to survive; not by improving their fitness, but by being spoon-fed what others have worked for, because surely the Patron saint of Turks, (role-model St. Francis of Assisi), Saint Bananiot, has himself achieved the pinnacle of evolutionary purpose

Nope, the Turks are Human, and as evolved as others. They cannot use excuses that they are different, and so can behave in less-than the minimum rightful moral conduct, expected for other Humans.