Viewpoint wrote:Piratis wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Piratis wrote:The fact of the matter is that we have the right to unite with whomever we want.
How could it be fine if Cyprus was part of the Ottoman or British empires, against the will of the native Cypriots, but not fine for Cyprus to be part of the Greek Republic, if this is what the vast majority of Cypriots themselves wanted?
You attacked and you continue to attack us in order to prevent Cyprus from being free. This is the Cyprus problem.
If it wasn't for the Turkish aggression and expansionism there wouldn't even be Turks in Cyprus to begin with.
See this is exactly where you go wrong being the majority does not mean you can do what you want to the detrement of others, if you all voted to behead female adultesses would that be right? There are somethings where you cannto disregard the opinion of a large percentage of your population escpecially when you ask them to sign their own death warrant.
But I never said that the majority can do whatever it wants on the detriment of others. This is only what
you say.
Beheading female adulteresses is a human right violation. We never asked for the human rights of anybody to be violated. (this is what you are asking for, and you seek derogations from the EU aquis)
What we asked is what we had every right for. Our self-determination and freedom from foreign rulers. And self-determination means that you can democratically decide to unite with others. This is not something which violates the human rights of anybody.
In fact there is a UN resolution about decolonization that clearly states that " integration into an independent State" is one of the "three legitimate options of full self-government."
http://www.un.org/Depts/dpi/decolonizat ... ration.htmSo how can you compare our right for self-determination with a crime like "Beheading female adulteresses"?? On the contrary, the crime was denying to the Cypriot people their freedom and self-determination, and the Turks did behead many innocent people in order to prevent Cyprus from being free:
During the Greek War of Independence in 1821, the Ottoman authorities feared that Greek Cypriots would rebel again. Archbishop Kyprianos, a powerful leader who worked to improve the education of Greek Cypriot children, was accused of plotting against the government. Kyprianos, his bishops, and hundreds of priests and important laymen were arrested and summarily hanged or decapitated on July 9, 1821.
And in the 1950s, while we were again fighting against the British for our right for self-determination, you again choose to attack us in order to deny to us our rights.
And to excuse the crimes that you committed and which let us to the inter-communal conflict and the war of 74, you are trying to present our desire for freedom and self-determination as supposedly something terrible and wrong. You do this by using baseless and
imaginary scenarios which have nothing to do with reality. The reality is that Cypriots wanted their self-determination which was their
right and we have been attacked by you.
So don't put words in my mouth. What I support is
democracy and a true democracy, the one you
never allowed to exist in Cyprus, is one were all citizens are equal, one person one vote, and were you have
majority rule AND
human and minority rights.
So stop trying to make the lame argument that democracy and majority rule means no human or minority rights, and that if we have democracy all hell will break loose.
Can the "democracy" you crave give you the GCs the right to bring about capital punishment for women adultresses? a YES or NO is good enough to prove my point.
The answer is
NO. So what point did you prove?
Probably you confuse the real democracy that I advocate with "democracies" like Turkey or non democracies like in other Muslim countries that "capital punishment for women adulteresses" is possible.
As I explained you already, democracy means both, majority rule AND human and minority rights. For your information in EU countries capital punishment is prohibited even for serious crimes.
Its not the democracy that frightens us but the people who you demand should administer it named the "majority" being the GCs. We need safeguards and plenty of them to defend our rights therefore guaranteeing we have an effective say in our own future.
Here we go with the "evil" GCs theories again and the lame excuse to deny democracy from Cyprus. It is this mentality of yours that caused the conflicts. There would be no conflicts at all if you respected democracy to begin with.
You say there is no factual evidence that your "democratic" right to gift Cyprus to Greece would in fact have meant my anniahalation, well thank god there is none as I would not be here to write this post..
Not only there is no evidence to support your baseless imaginary scenarios, but the evidence point to the
contrary. Rhodes united with Greece in 1947 and Rhodes also has a Turkish minority on it. Nothing happened to them.
a large portion of the "Cypriot" population opposed becoming part of Greece and wanted to stay independent your rentless mindless actions that it was your right forced the TC hand to beg for help from Turkey in the shape of Taksim, so again you have been your own worst enemy as if you would have embraced independence and building of one Cypriot people including the TCs you would have divided the island.
First of all when you came up with Taksim Cyprus was not independent, and you had not even proposed independence. Cyprus was part of the British and earlier Ottoman empires. So how could it be fine for Cyprus to be part of the British or Ottoman empires against the will of the
vast majority of Cypriots, but not OK for Cyprus to be part of Greece which is what most of the Cypriots themselves wanted?
Not only that, but uniting our island with whomever we democratically choose was in fact our right, as clearly stated by the UN resolution for decolonization which clearly states that "integration into an independent State" is one of the " three legitimate options of full self-government."
http://www.un.org/Depts/dpi/decolonizat ... ration.htmWhat is more humane forcing someone to live in another country which they want nothing to do with or giving you a share of a country so you can do whatever you wish, out of the 2 options Taksim is much fairer that enosis, we both get to live as we wish, you only problem is your greed for more land.
Nobody forced you to live in Cyprus. On the contrary you are the ones who came on this island with the aim to enslave and exploit us.
After being ruled by foreigners for centuries we had
every right for our self-determination, and self-determination also means the right to unite with whomever we democratically choose.
Union with Greece was the
right of Cypriots and would violate the human rights of
nobody. All you have against union with Greece is some imaginary and baseless scenarios and nothing more.
On the other hand taksim, means the
ethnic cleaning of 100s of thousands of people from their homeland and a ton of other human rights violations.
And then you have the nerve to say that the only problem with partition is our "greed"?? So it our "greed" that we want to live in
our own land, and not your greed that you want to steal our land?
You are shameless!