Piratis wrote: Erolz, what I offer to you is democracy and full human rights for everybody.
What I support is what they have in France, in UK, in US, in Germany, in Italy, in Spain, in Portugal, in Poland, in Hungary, in Ireland, in Sweden, in Norway, in Finland, in Australia, in Turkey .. oops take turkey out, I don't want TCs to be treated as Kurds are treated in Turkey.
Cyprus' history is unique. Have any of the countries mentioned above exited for many 1000's of years as an owned country with no independance? Did they gain their independance only in the last 50 years? Did they have two distinic ehtnic groups that made up the population of the island/country for hundreds of years?
Have you never heard of the 'tyranny of the majority'?
Piratis wrote:So what I am saying is just the normal. I want to have a normal democratic country. Is that so bad for you?
It is normal for an ethnic group of people that have lived as such for hundreds of years to seek a right to self determination? To not be controlled by a larger majority from another ethnic group?
Your ideal of 'normal' is based on a normalacy that simply does not exists in Cyprus (but does in all your other invalid comparisons). That of a common national idendtity. There has never been a common national cypriot idendtity in Cyprus. There has always been a G Cypriot identity and a T Cypriot idenitity. It is for the very reason that from the inception of the independent state of Cyprus there was some form of acceptance of a need for and a reality of some degree of political 'equality'. There was back then I believe (amongst progressives and optimists at least) a hope that over time this reality of two sperate people living togeather on Cyprus would evolve into a true common Cypriot idenitity. That hope was destroyed by the events from 60 onwards and is still being thwarted by your current position today. You want to impose a 'normalacy' that has to be based on and dependent on a single common Cypriot identity before such common idendtity exists. You also just 'happen' to be in the numericaly larger of the two communites whilst insisting this - coincidence perhaps?
Piratis wrote:I said it to Insan a while ago:
If we are going to be friends we have to respect each others human and democratic rights. Why should I want to be your friend and make peace with you when you want to continue violating my and my children and grandchildren human and democratic rights?
What it feels you are saying to me is either accpet that TC must live as a political minority in Cyprus under the domination of a GC majority - or accept you will be my enemy. That to mee feels less like an offer of friendship and more like a threat. Just because I do not accept TC should live under laws and rules and a government that is controlled and dominated by a different ethnic group, and one that has a long history of animosity towards TC, that does not mean I am violating your, your childrens or grandchildrens human or democratic rights. Unless you believe it is a basic human right for a seperate and distinict ethnic group to control and dominate the destiny of another seperate and different ethnic group?
Do you think a united Cyprus should be 'multi lingual'? That there should be two offical languages? Or do you believe that all TC, their children and grand children should be forced to speak Greek? If you believe they should then that is just one example of the potential for a 'tyranny of the majority'. Even if you do not and agree it should be written into the consitituion of Cyprus that there are two languages, what is to stop a GC majority later deciding and imposing Greek as the sole offical language of Cyprus (and thus destroying Cyprus' TC culture), if there are to be no protections for TC given by some form of political equality? Or am I supposed to just trust in the goodwill and sense of the majority and further a majority that has a long long history of animosity to TC?
If you a comparable 'normalacy' to other countries in EU then first you must create the 'normalacy' of a single common national Cypriot identity. To insist on one without the other is for me unreasonable, unrealistic and biased and not compatible with true unity in Cyprus, or for that matter fundamental human rights. It is compatible for me with a GC who believes Cyprus is Greek and solely Greek. With one that believes the problems of Cyprus are related to TC not being willing to accept their place (as a minority) in a Greek Cyprus.