The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


A Sad Day For Freedom Of Speech?

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

Postby Paphitis » Fri Feb 13, 2009 2:42 am

Get Real! wrote:
bill cobbett wrote:This Wilders chappy is... well.... it would save words if I describe him as a right wing fascist bastxxrd.

The film itself isn't banned. Given the internet that would be a pretty useless step to take. The man himself is banned from GB for three years.

Does the film provoke racial or religious hatred (both crimes in GB and elsewhere) or does it provoke a breakdown pf public order or does it merely provoke debate? I guess the answer to that depends on the sensibilities of the audience and I suspect that the very small number of people who would be provoked to public disorder by the film will find some other excuse to vent their angers publically or to rouse others to do their dirty work for them.

So my view is that it was a sad day cos the limits to free expression should be as liberal as possible whilst staying on the right side the law of encitement to other crimes.

Extreme views should be condemned by way of reasoned debate and opposition. If we just ban these people aren't we just condemning ourselves by our cowardice and unwillingness to confront vile opinions in free debate? I don't think it's the job of governments to choose whether to allow people to take on that challenge, it's ours.

While you were blissfully preoccupied with your philosophical diarrhea above, only God knows how many people died in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Palestine, at the hands of US, UK, and Israeli criminals, so if you think that “confronting vile opinions” is important then imagine how important it is to confront the VILE ACTIONS of these criminal countries… so do get your priorities right Bill!


I think people have been tolerating your verbal diarrhea for a very long time, for the simple reason that you offer this forum some much needed light hearted entertainment, and witt.

However, you are starting to border the ridiculous when you get on your high horse and start speaking in this arrogant manner about peoples ideological beliefs on free speech, which were expressed in a very reasonable manner. By contrast your depiction of Israel, US, UK and Co is hardly balanced, intellectual or fair, regardless of the fact that I may agree with your general sentiments about the Iraq War but definitely DO NOT agree with you about the Afghani War.

It seems you just look for an excuse to bag the West, and I do understand your frustration, and most of it is justified, but after your last post I am going to have to ask you to smarten up, because your contributions are very one sided, and not to be taken seriously.

In order to be taken seriously you could try saying things like "America was wrong to attack Afghanistan but.....", because the fact of the matter is America is not always wrong and sometimes there are reasons as to why things happen and just maybe America was justified in attacking Afghanistan considering the fact that American soil was attacked by an enemy for the first time since Pearl Harbor.

If you think that countries are just going to sit back and take the shit dished out on September 11 or in Bali, then you severely have your head stuck up your arse. The simple fact that the citizens of America, UK, and Australia were successfully targeted in New York on September 11, Bali or Mumbai, is an act of war and for that there are consequences.
Last edited by Paphitis on Fri Feb 13, 2009 3:12 am, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby bill cobbett » Fri Feb 13, 2009 2:58 am

Get Real! wrote:
bill cobbett wrote:This Wilders chappy is... well.... it would save words if I describe him as a right wing fascist bastxxrd.

The film itself isn't banned. Given the internet that would be a pretty useless step to take. The man himself is banned from GB for three years.

Does the film provoke racial or religious hatred (both crimes in GB and elsewhere) or does it provoke a breakdown pf public order or does it merely provoke debate? I guess the answer to that depends on the sensibilities of the audience and I suspect that the very small number of people who would be provoked to public disorder by the film will find some other excuse to vent their angers publically or to rouse others to do their dirty work for them.

So my view is that it was a sad day cos the limits to free expression should be as liberal as possible whilst staying on the right side the law of encitement to other crimes.

Extreme views should be condemned by way of reasoned debate and opposition. If we just ban these people aren't we just condemning ourselves by our cowardice and unwillingness to confront vile opinions in free debate? I don't think it's the job of governments to choose whether to allow people to take on that challenge, it's ours.

While you were blissfully preoccupied with your philosophical diarrhea above, only God knows how many people died in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Palestine, at the hands of US, UK, and Israeli criminals, so if you think that “confronting vile opinions” is important then imagine how important it is to confront the VILE ACTIONS of these criminal countries… so do get your priorities right Bill!


What me? A "feelosofer" ? I don't think so. :lol:

As I'm sure you'll be aware, if only in the clear light of morning, it is not unusual to hold far than one opinion at a time on a wide range of subjects. So it is just about possible to hold strong convictions about free speech and say the vile, outrageous and criminal Gaza massacres of a few weeks ago at the same time. The foundation for the latter statement, is not through any strange allegiance to any nation state (which seems to provide some here with the basis for their opeeeeneeons) but as a matter of personal individual conscience....

....oh dear! ...."feelosofising" again!

(Edit - If I can add hatred of a nation state please as an equally condemnable motive for opinions)
User avatar
bill cobbett
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 15759
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Embargoed from Kyrenia by Jurkish Army and Genocided (many times) by Thieving, Brain-Washed Lordo

Postby Paphitis » Fri Feb 13, 2009 3:24 am

bill cobbett wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
bill cobbett wrote:This Wilders chappy is... well.... it would save words if I describe him as a right wing fascist bastxxrd.

The film itself isn't banned. Given the internet that would be a pretty useless step to take. The man himself is banned from GB for three years.

Does the film provoke racial or religious hatred (both crimes in GB and elsewhere) or does it provoke a breakdown pf public order or does it merely provoke debate? I guess the answer to that depends on the sensibilities of the audience and I suspect that the very small number of people who would be provoked to public disorder by the film will find some other excuse to vent their angers publically or to rouse others to do their dirty work for them.

So my view is that it was a sad day cos the limits to free expression should be as liberal as possible whilst staying on the right side the law of encitement to other crimes.

Extreme views should be condemned by way of reasoned debate and opposition. If we just ban these people aren't we just condemning ourselves by our cowardice and unwillingness to confront vile opinions in free debate? I don't think it's the job of governments to choose whether to allow people to take on that challenge, it's ours.

While you were blissfully preoccupied with your philosophical diarrhea above, only God knows how many people died in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Palestine, at the hands of US, UK, and Israeli criminals, so if you think that “confronting vile opinions” is important then imagine how important it is to confront the VILE ACTIONS of these criminal countries… so do get your priorities right Bill!


What me? A "feelosofer" ? I don't think so. :lol:

As I'm sure you'll be aware, if only in the clear light of morning, it is not unusual to hold far than one opinion at a time on a wide range of subjects. So it is just about possible to hold strong convictions about free speech and say the vile, outrageous and criminal Gaza massacres of a few weeks ago at the same time. The foundation for the latter statement, is not through any strange allegiance to any nation state (which seems to provide some here with the basis for their opeeeeneeons) but as a matter of personal individual conscience....

....oh dear! ...."feelosofising" again!

(Edit - If I can add hatred of a nation state please as an equally condemnable motive for opinions)


I think most decent people have strong opinions against the events in Gaza, only the heartless would not.

The same can be said about the Iraq War which was on false pretences as well. :roll:

People can express their opinions any way they wish, and it is appreciated when it is done in a logical and sensible manner. It is also greatly appreciated when people express their opinions in a considerate, fair and balanced manner, something Miltiades, Free Spirit and our good friend GR! are not capable off. :roll:
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby Get Real! » Fri Feb 13, 2009 4:45 am

What is more important to you all?

The alleged threat to our right to free speech or that we end this unnecessary death & destruction the west is causing in various parts of the world?

GB’s decision to stop any further fuel being added to the fire was correct because getting our priorities right can save lives and suffering…

Bill, this one's for you...

"I cried for not having shoes until I saw a man with no legs”

Paphitis, this one's for you...

GROW UP!
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Paphitis » Fri Feb 13, 2009 4:50 am

Get Real! wrote:What is more important to you all?

The alleged threat to our right to free speech or that we end this unnecessary death & destruction the west is causing in various parts of the world?

GB’s decision to stop any further fuel being added to the fire was correct because getting our priorities right can save lives and suffering…

Bill, this one's for you...

"I cried for not having shoes until I saw a man with no legs”

Paphitis, this one's for you...

GROW UP!


Gee thanks! :lol:

Since what I was saying is beyond you, let me dumb it down for you.

My post was not about free Speech but was about balance and fairness. Try It! :)
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby Get Real! » Fri Feb 13, 2009 5:00 am

Paphitis wrote:
Get Real! wrote:What is more important to you all?

The alleged threat to our right to free speech or that we end this unnecessary death & destruction the west is causing in various parts of the world?

GB’s decision to stop any further fuel being added to the fire was correct because getting our priorities right can save lives and suffering…

Bill, this one's for you...

"I cried for not having shoes until I saw a man with no legs”

Paphitis, this one's for you...

GROW UP!


Gee thanks! :lol:

Since what I was saying is beyond you, let me dumb it down for you.

My post was not about free Speech but was about balance and fairness. Try It! :)

This thread is called “A Sad Day For Freedom Of Speech?” and I know a bollocks thread when I see one, and Bill gave us the full Monty with this one!

As for your irrelevant “balance and fairness” theories, start your own thread on that and watch how fast unkie GR can give you a mental rearrangement…
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Paphitis » Fri Feb 13, 2009 5:05 am

Get Real! wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
Get Real! wrote:What is more important to you all?

The alleged threat to our right to free speech or that we end this unnecessary death & destruction the west is causing in various parts of the world?

GB’s decision to stop any further fuel being added to the fire was correct because getting our priorities right can save lives and suffering…

Bill, this one's for you...

"I cried for not having shoes until I saw a man with no legs”

Paphitis, this one's for you...

GROW UP!


Gee thanks! :lol:

Since what I was saying is beyond you, let me dumb it down for you.

My post was not about free Speech but was about balance and fairness. Try It! :)

This thread is called “A Sad Day For Freedom Of Speech?” and I know a bollocks thread when I see one, and Bill gave us the full Monty with this one!

As for your irrelevant “balance and fairness” theories, start your own thread on that and watch how fast unkie GR can give you a mental rearrangement…


Balance and Fairness is not a theory and as far mental rearrangements are concerned, we can all see how you have put into practice exactly what you preach...

Have a nice day GR! the Great. :)
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby miltiades » Fri Feb 13, 2009 10:18 am

Paphitis wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
Get Real! wrote:What is more important to you all?

The alleged threat to our right to free speech or that we end this unnecessary death & destruction the west is causing in various parts of the world?

GB’s decision to stop any further fuel being added to the fire was correct because getting our priorities right can save lives and suffering…

Bill, this one's for you...

"I cried for not having shoes until I saw a man with no legs”

Paphitis, this one's for you...

GROW UP!


Gee thanks! :lol:

Since what I was saying is beyond you, let me dumb it down for you.

My post was not about free Speech but was about balance and fairness. Try It! :)

This thread is called “A Sad Day For Freedom Of Speech?” and I know a bollocks thread when I see one, and Bill gave us the full Monty with this one!

As for your irrelevant “balance and fairness” theories, start your own thread on that and watch how fast unkie GR can give you a mental rearrangement…


Balance and Fairness is not a theory and as far mental rearrangements are concerned, we can all see how you have put into practice exactly what you preach...

Have a nice day GR! the Great. :)


You missed out the word CLOWN after Great !
This guy is so full of crap it would take a huge VOTHRO to hold it.
He is funny , at times , but of late I have become oblivious of his wittiness since it has been overtaken by his sheer nonsensical posts.
Give the clown a hand , a push more likely !!!
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Postby wallace » Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:05 pm

Get Real! wrote:And btw, to answer your question... "A Sad Day For Freedom Of Speech?"

On the contrary, the Dutch clown is an insult to...

Iraq's Shocking Human Toll:

About 1 Million Killed, 4.5 Million Displaced, 1-2 Million Widows, 5 Million Orphans


http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/12381 ... n_orphans/


The only clown here is you if you do not recognise that most of these deaths (how sad they are) are caused by the fanatics under the muslim population itself. (suicide bombers & car bombers) The man is a parlementarian which was denied entry into another EU state. The film is combined footage which has already been seen around the world in news bulletins. So get your facts right. The men lost his freedom of movement were we all so proudly fight for in Cyprus, and it was taken away by the phekking Brits. I will call you GR the clown from now on 8) Have a nice day :lol:
User avatar
wallace
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:52 am
Location: Far Away

Postby wallace » Fri Feb 13, 2009 1:47 pm

Get Real! wrote:
wallace wrote:
Get Real! wrote:And btw, to answer your question... "A Sad Day For Freedom Of Speech?"

On the contrary, the Dutch clown is an insult to...

Iraq's Shocking Human Toll:

About 1 Million Killed, 4.5 Million Displaced, 1-2 Million Widows, 5 Million Orphans


http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/12381 ... n_orphans/


The only clown here is you if you do not recognise that most of these deaths (how sad they are) are caused by the fanatics under the muslim population itself. (suicide bombers & car bombers) The man is a parlementarian which was denied entry into another EU state. The film is combined footage which has already been seen around the world in news bulletins. So get your facts right. The men lost his freedom of movement were we all so proudly fight for in Cyprus, and it was taken away by the phekking Brits. I will call you GR the clown from now on 8) Have a nice day :lol:

Even if there were 1000 suicide bombings (and there were not) by 50 victims per attempt (and there were not) that would account for just 50,000 of Iraqi victims!

NOW WHERE’S THE REMAINING 950,000 DEATHS YOU INCOMPETENT LITTLE WHORE??? :evil:

The next time you open your stupid mouth make sure you’ve got credible facts to back the manufactured trash you post.

Now get out of my sight fool!


First....this thread is called A Sad day for freedom of speech!!! Now GR the CLOWN has to come along and throw in some links of the deaths in Iraq. Now who is the incompetent whore here you silly Bitch? :evil: So get back to the topic and talk about the freedom of speech and movement or just F... OFF from this thread. Plonker
User avatar
wallace
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:52 am
Location: Far Away

PreviousNext

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest