The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


ENCLAVES DIVIDE GREEK CYPRIOTS

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Piratis » Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:10 am

Bananiot wrote:I cannot really respond to Piratis's logic for the simple reason that he thinks that democracy is just a matter of statistics. No matter what anyone says the mind of such people cannot be changed. Piratis believes that the majority has a sovereign right over the minority and if the majority decides to annihilate the minority then this is the democratic right of the majority. We have been through this one thousand times and Piratis has not learnt a single thing.

Let me return to the enclaves issue. The question that begs an answer is who guided and kept the turkish cypriots into the enclaves and a life of misery and pain. The liars in the Greek Cypriot community say that it was their choice. The truth of the matter is that the Turkish Cypriots were forced into the enclaves by the strong pressure of TMT, their fear of Greek Cypriot attacks and the actions of the legal government of Cyprus. Makarios, speaking in Athens on February 6 1967 was quite revealing. He said:

What kind of a new Turkish Cypriot generation will be produced in Cyprus when everything is in the hands of the Greeks? For how long will they last? May be for 3, 5 or 10 months, I cannot be sure. The Turks will then give in. Their morale is extremely low.


Makarios admits here what the defendants of the true history deny. That the aim for keeping the Turkish Cypriots in enclaves was to squeeze them to submission. There were 33 road blocks at the time around the enclaves as well as check points and all persons going in or out were checked out. There was a list of products that were not allowed in the enclaves. Among them were spare parts for cars! The worst, the government would allow Turkish Cypriots to go abroad for studies but upon concluding their studies they were not allowed to return to Cyprus!

How many Greek Cypriot pupils know of the above? The answer is no body knows these horrific details. We have been telling our kids that the Turkish Cypriots went into the enclaves willingly and that this was the policy of Turkey. These kind of lies have produced a nation of ignorant imbeciles like a few of the Greek Cypriots that write in this forum and make decent Greek Cypriots ashamed of what they are.


You can not defeat my arguments so you put words in my mouth and defeat them instead. What you do actually has a name. It is called the "Straw Man Fallacy" http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/straw-man.html

I never said anything about the right of majority to "annihilate the minority". :roll: I am talking about the right of the Cypriot people for self-determination. To determine the destiny of their own island in a democratic way and unite (if they want) with whomever they want to unite, Greece, EU or whatever.

The TCs, with the encouragement of Turkey and UK, attacked us in the 50s starting the inter-communal conflict with the aim to refuse to Cyprus its self-determination rights and have gains on our expense, which were granted to them by the British with the 1960 "agreements" which were forced on the Cypriot people. We simply fought back seeking our rights. Noting more than that.

What Makarios did in the 60s had one aim: To bring democracy. If the Turks had accepted democracy (=one person - one vote, majority rule, minority rights) then the conflict would not continue. But the TCs insisted on continuing the conflict they started in the 50s with the aim to maintain the unfair privileges that were granted to them by the British and Turks.

What did you expect us to do? To just sit there and be second category citizens on our own country? Sorry Bananiot, but we had enough of the Ottoman Style privileges granted to the Muslims by foreigners on our expense. We are were not living in the Ottoman era anymore. Every Cypriot should be equal citizen and there was no way we could tolerate any more racist discriminations on our expense anymore.

These are the facts.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby Get Real! » Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:16 am

Bananiot wrote:Ignorant he is but not too young. If he is so sure about himself he should now refer to resolution S/7967 dated 13/6/1967 again by U Thant. There lies the truth whom U thant discovered in 1967.

S/7967. Letter of 9 June 1967 from USSR (request to place on agenda item entitled: "Cessation of military action by Israel and withdrawal of the Israeli forces from those parts of the territory of the United Arab Republic, Jordan and Syria which they have seized as the result of an aggression).”

http://domino.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/361eea ... enDocument

Stick to the coffee shop Bananiot because here you have no credibility...
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Piratis » Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:24 am

CopperLine wrote:
I have shown time and time again in this forum that all conflicts and wars between Cypriots and Turks in Cyprus were in fact started by the Turks, in their attempt to deny to the Cypriot people their self-determination and keep Cyprus under their control.

The Cypriot people fought and will continue to fight for democracy, freedom and self-determination.

If the Turks had allowed the Cypriot people to democratically choose what to do with their own island, then there would be no conflicts, no wars and no suffering for anybody.


Piratis,
You demonstrate here, again, that you are not interested in history but instead in moralising. You demonstrate that you're not a historian but a theologian - trying to identify the original sinner : Adam not Eve ? Eve not Adam. A daft exercise of trying to find the truth in self-serving fiction.


Adam and Eve are imaginary creations. Here we are talking about historical facts. You can't complain about your casualties and suffering in a war, presenting yourselves as the victims, and ignore the fact that it is you who started the war.

How about if we do the same for WWII? We just skip how the war started, and we fast forward some years later, and see Germany being bombed and invaded from all sites, and nuclear bombs being dropped in Japan. Would starting from the middle give an accurate picture of what happened in that war? I think not. This is why I start from the beginning.

I like it how the Turks often cry "the Cyprus problem didn't start in 74", and they take us back to 63. But when it is pointed out to them that the begging was not 63 either, but the 50s (when they collaborated with the Colonialists and attacked us starting the conflict), they start crying because it doesn't suit them.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby Murataga » Mon Feb 09, 2009 8:03 am

Piratis wrote:
CopperLine wrote:
I have shown time and time again in this forum that all conflicts and wars between Cypriots and Turks in Cyprus were in fact started by the Turks, in their attempt to deny to the Cypriot people their self-determination and keep Cyprus under their control.

The Cypriot people fought and will continue to fight for democracy, freedom and self-determination.

If the Turks had allowed the Cypriot people to democratically choose what to do with their own island, then there would be no conflicts, no wars and no suffering for anybody.


Piratis,
You demonstrate here, again, that you are not interested in history but instead in moralising. You demonstrate that you're not a historian but a theologian - trying to identify the original sinner : Adam not Eve ? Eve not Adam. A daft exercise of trying to find the truth in self-serving fiction.


Adam and Eve are imaginary creations. Here we are talking about historical facts. You can't complain about your casualties and suffering in a war, presenting yourselves as the victims, and ignore the fact that it is you who started the war.

How about if we do the same for WWII? We just skip how the war started, and we fast forward some years later, and see Germany being bombed and invaded from all sites, and nuclear bombs being dropped in Japan. Would starting from the middle give an accurate picture of what happened in that war? I think not. This is why I start from the beginning.

I like it how the Turks often cry "the Cyprus problem didn't start in 74", and they take us back to 63. But when it is pointed out to them that the begging was not 63 either, but the 50s (when they collaborated with the Colonialists and attacked us starting the conflict), they start crying because it doesn't suit them.


And again, how is it that I have started the conflict when you were the one to first launch an organized offensive to hand my land and citizenship over to Greece? The fancy name which you want to call your "struggle" does not change the fact that it was a murder campaign to hand me and everything I owned in Cyprus to Greece and it certainly does not mean that I did not have the inalienable right and the responsibility to resist it. We are not crying about our resistance; we are in fact very proud of it.

On the other hand you made an agreement in to the 1960 government. There was an established state, a rule of law ratified by all sides. There was a state whose name was registered to the U.N. You prooved beyond any doubt that you lied in your signature and that you can not be trusted. And today, you are the one that starts to cry that your were "forced" to sign this agreement. Don`t confuse things.
User avatar
Murataga
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 824
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 5:32 pm

Postby Bananiot » Mon Feb 09, 2009 10:44 am

“S/7967. Letter of 9 June 1967 from USSR (request to place on agenda item entitled: "Cessation of military action by Israel and withdrawal of the Israeli forces from those parts of the territory of the United Arab Republic, Jordan and Syria which they have seized as the result of an aggression).”

http://domino.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/361eea ... enDocument

Stick to the coffee shop Bananiot because here you have no credibility...


Now, try S79/69 paragraph 108, that's a good boy!
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Postby Oracle » Mon Feb 09, 2009 11:24 am

Murataga wrote:
Piratis wrote:
CopperLine wrote:
I have shown time and time again in this forum that all conflicts and wars between Cypriots and Turks in Cyprus were in fact started by the Turks, in their attempt to deny to the Cypriot people their self-determination and keep Cyprus under their control.

The Cypriot people fought and will continue to fight for democracy, freedom and self-determination.

If the Turks had allowed the Cypriot people to democratically choose what to do with their own island, then there would be no conflicts, no wars and no suffering for anybody.


Piratis,
You demonstrate here, again, that you are not interested in history but instead in moralising. You demonstrate that you're not a historian but a theologian - trying to identify the original sinner : Adam not Eve ? Eve not Adam. A daft exercise of trying to find the truth in self-serving fiction.


Adam and Eve are imaginary creations. Here we are talking about historical facts. You can't complain about your casualties and suffering in a war, presenting yourselves as the victims, and ignore the fact that it is you who started the war.

How about if we do the same for WWII? We just skip how the war started, and we fast forward some years later, and see Germany being bombed and invaded from all sites, and nuclear bombs being dropped in Japan. Would starting from the middle give an accurate picture of what happened in that war? I think not. This is why I start from the beginning.

I like it how the Turks often cry "the Cyprus problem didn't start in 74", and they take us back to 63. But when it is pointed out to them that the begging was not 63 either, but the 50s (when they collaborated with the Colonialists and attacked us starting the conflict), they start crying because it doesn't suit them.


And again, how is it that I have started the conflict when you were the one to first launch an organized offensive to hand my land and citizenship over to Greece? The fancy name which you want to call your "struggle" does not change the fact that it was a murder campaign to hand me and everything I owned in Cyprus to Greece and it certainly does not mean that I did not have the inalienable right and the responsibility to resist it. We are not crying about our resistance; we are in fact very proud of it.

On the other hand you made an agreement in to the 1960 government. There was an established state, a rule of law ratified by all sides. There was a state whose name was registered to the U.N. You prooved beyond any doubt that you lied in your signature and that you can not be trusted. And today, you are the one that starts to cry that your were "forced" to sign this agreement. Don`t confuse things.


The Creationist has turned up .... :roll:

From Piratis' facts to Murataga's Myths .... imaginary "murder campaigns" exchanged for present day actual, inexcusable violations of thousands of GCs' Rights.
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby halil » Mon Feb 09, 2009 11:30 am

Bananiot wrote:
“S/7967. Letter of 9 June 1967 from USSR (request to place on agenda item entitled: "Cessation of military action by Israel and withdrawal of the Israeli forces from those parts of the territory of the United Arab Republic, Jordan and Syria which they have seized as the result of an aggression).”

http://domino.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/361eea ... enDocument

Stick to the coffee shop Bananiot because here you have no credibility...


Now, try S79/69 paragraph 108, that's a good boy!


let them to talk Bananiot ...... living witness or evidances are we are about the enclaves ..... I have been all true ...... sea was so close to my home but i could not go ...... barricades .....Barricades ......searches on the ways and people are disappearing just like that ..... let them to talk .... tongue hasn't got bone !!!!!!!!!!!!

GR ....Pirates never had those days .... they don't understand .......

To get food people were on the ques ..... Waiting the red cresent or UN helps ..... For those helps weren't also easy to pass from the barricades..... To understand the enclave people you must all live true to those years . Day time u can work at field and night times u can not be at your home .... you must be at frontier ( our fathers , uncles ,brothers) for 11 years most of the enclaves life was like this . they never enjoy their life .... day and night they were at hills ..... Evidence .... what a bloody evidence .... it is very easyway to try to get away from truth . These people are still in life .... may in 20-30 years time they will all go but thanks to god most of them started to publishing their memories now ....
halil
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8804
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: nicosia

Postby lovernomore » Mon Feb 09, 2009 12:38 pm

Bananiot wrote:
“S/7967. Letter of 9 June 1967 from USSR (request to place on agenda item entitled: "Cessation of military action by Israel and withdrawal of the Israeli forces from those parts of the territory of the United Arab Republic, Jordan and Syria which they have seized as the result of an aggression).”

http://domino.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/361eea ... enDocument

Stick to the coffee shop Bananiot because here you have no credibility...


Now, try S79/69 paragraph 108, that's a good boy!


Bananiot, GR has allready see this, he is very clever. He see it but it dose not serve his purpose to aknowlege. This kind of people (piratis, GR Kifeas) are all blind to trueth.

The worry for me is one day we will hav to lieve together with such people and God help us and God help Gcs like Bananiot.
User avatar
lovernomore
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 4:58 pm

Postby lovernomore » Mon Feb 09, 2009 12:41 pm

Oracle wrote:
Murataga wrote:
Piratis wrote:
CopperLine wrote:
I have shown time and time again in this forum that all conflicts and wars between Cypriots and Turks in Cyprus were in fact started by the Turks, in their attempt to deny to the Cypriot people their self-determination and keep Cyprus under their control.

The Cypriot people fought and will continue to fight for democracy, freedom and self-determination.

If the Turks had allowed the Cypriot people to democratically choose what to do with their own island, then there would be no conflicts, no wars and no suffering for anybody.


Piratis,
You demonstrate here, again, that you are not interested in history but instead in moralising. You demonstrate that you're not a historian but a theologian - trying to identify the original sinner : Adam not Eve ? Eve not Adam. A daft exercise of trying to find the truth in self-serving fiction.


Adam and Eve are imaginary creations. Here we are talking about historical facts. You can't complain about your casualties and suffering in a war, presenting yourselves as the victims, and ignore the fact that it is you who started the war.

How about if we do the same for WWII? We just skip how the war started, and we fast forward some years later, and see Germany being bombed and invaded from all sites, and nuclear bombs being dropped in Japan. Would starting from the middle give an accurate picture of what happened in that war? I think not. This is why I start from the beginning.

I like it how the Turks often cry "the Cyprus problem didn't start in 74", and they take us back to 63. But when it is pointed out to them that the begging was not 63 either, but the 50s (when they collaborated with the Colonialists and attacked us starting the conflict), they start crying because it doesn't suit them.


And again, how is it that I have started the conflict when you were the one to first launch an organized offensive to hand my land and citizenship over to Greece? The fancy name which you want to call your "struggle" does not change the fact that it was a murder campaign to hand me and everything I owned in Cyprus to Greece and it certainly does not mean that I did not have the inalienable right and the responsibility to resist it. We are not crying about our resistance; we are in fact very proud of it.

On the other hand you made an agreement in to the 1960 government. There was an established state, a rule of law ratified by all sides. There was a state whose name was registered to the U.N. You prooved beyond any doubt that you lied in your signature and that you can not be trusted. And today, you are the one that starts to cry that your were "forced" to sign this agreement. Don`t confuse things.


The Creationist has turned up .... :roll:

From Piratis' facts to Murataga's Myths .... imaginary "murder campaigns" exchanged for present day actual, inexcusable violations of thousands of GCs' Rights.


Oracle is reely a mistery to me. She write best English but her argumens give me impresion her brain is size of a pea. How can this be?
User avatar
lovernomore
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 4:58 pm

Postby DT. » Mon Feb 09, 2009 12:46 pm

lovernomore wrote:
Bananiot wrote:
“S/7967. Letter of 9 June 1967 from USSR (request to place on agenda item entitled: "Cessation of military action by Israel and withdrawal of the Israeli forces from those parts of the territory of the United Arab Republic, Jordan and Syria which they have seized as the result of an aggression).”

http://domino.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/361eea ... enDocument

Stick to the coffee shop Bananiot because here you have no credibility...


Now, try S79/69 paragraph 108, that's a good boy!


Bananiot, GR has allready see this, he is very clever. He see it but it dose not serve his purpose to aknowlege. This kind of people (piratis, GR Kifeas) are all blind to trueth.

The worry for me is one day we will hav to lieve together with such people and God help us and God help Gcs like Bananiot.


But you told us you weren't a TC? Why do you have to live with the GC's?
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests