Cyprus-Forum.com

[CopperLine]

Kifeas,
You gave a predictably boring reply wildly speculating in your typical way what my motivations might be. On that you are quite simply clueless.

The property commission is indeed under evaluation to see whether it is an effective local remedy. But this does not diminish the fact that ECHR demanded that there be instituted an effective local remedy in northern Cyprus. It may turn out that the ECHR determines that the Property Commission is not an effective local remedy, but to return to my original criticism of Piratis, it would be foolhardy for someone to simply ignore the Property Commission because should the ECHR determine that it is effective - however slow - then by definition a claimant will not have exhausted local remedies.

[Oracle]

Sounds like CopperLine needs an effective "local" remedy.

If something is still on trial, having been "demanded" by the ECHR to be set up; they are hardly likely to insist people use this unknown-in-effectiveness entity, for resolving property issues.

But CopperLine is just trying to salvage something after inventing another "CopperLine Code of Law", cracked by Kifeas.

When medicinal drugs are in the Clinical Trials stage, sufferers are not forced to try them. Except of course if CopperLine was evaluating them

[Jerry]

It's just North of Famagusta on the coast.

There is a TRNC property commision you can apply to, it's just not promoted that well. If you contact the TRNC representitve in Trafalgar SQ they will have the details on where and how to apply.
There has been some positive results recently.

There is no such thing as "trnc" property commission.

Turkey established some property commission in the territory of Republic of Cyprus that they illegally occupy in order to try to delay the cases against her in the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). This Turkish property commission will only give to you peanuts.

Take your case directly to the ECHR.

There IS such a thing a the TRNC Property Commission. It has been established precisely in response and as a direct requirement of previous ECHR cases. So Piratis' advice is dead wrong, in fact if you tried to go direct to ECHR as he suggests they'd simply reject your application because you had not 'exhausted local remedies' i.e, had not at least tried to get remedy through the Property Commission.
Piratis' 'advice' is as reckless as it is misleading. Plus ca change ...

Sorry Copperline but you are WRONG. I've been there and done it. I have posted on here before that the "Property Commission" is badly run by incompetent fools, I wrote to the ECHR telling them so. Their response was to send me application forms (currently with my solicitor in Cyprus) to submit my case. I told them I had no confidence in the "Property Commission" and would not apply there - hardly exhausting the local remedy!

[DT.]

Kifeas,
You gave a predictably boring reply wildly speculating in your typical way what my motivations might be. On that you are quite simply clueless.

The property commission is indeed under evaluation to see whether it is an effective local remedy. But this does not diminish the fact that ECHR demanded that there be instituted an effective local remedy in northern Cyprus. It may turn out that the ECHR determines that the Property Commission is not an effective local remedy, but to return to my original criticism of Piratis, it would be foolhardy for someone to simply ignore the Property Commission because should the ECHR determine that it is effective - however slow - then by definition a claimant will not have exhausted local remedies.

Copperline who does the ECHR recognise as the governing authority of this property commission?