Cyprus-Forum.com

[miltiades]

How disgusting !

The T/Cs have absolutely nothing to feel ashamed about . This disgusting article full of hatred was published in a Turkish newspaper not a T/C one. The overwhelming majority of the T/C people are peaceful , decent family orientated folk who have nothing what so ever to do with such despicable writings.
I do not for one second consider this article related to the T/Cs.

[Oracle]

Or the translation for those who do not read the devil's language .....


HATRED

As long as the vulgar Greek exists in this world
By Allah, my hatred won't leave me
As long as I see him there like a dog
By Allah, this hatred won't leave me
A thousand heads of infidel Giaours cannot wash away this hatred.

My only aim is revenge
When my turn comes to go to battle
In one day I'll butcher a thousand Giaours
By Allah, this hatred won't leave me
A thousand heads of Giaours cannot wash away this hatred.

Even if I crush thirty thousand of their heads with a stone
Even if I wrench out the teeth of ten thousand
And throw a hundred thousand of their corpses into the river
By Allah, this hatred won't leave me

A thousand heads of Giaours cannot wash away this hatred.
The whole world knows how superior the Turk is
Who crashed the Greek's fucked world over his head
Even if I burn in stokeholes the heads of five thousand of them
By Allah, this hatred won't leave me

A thousand heads of Giaours cannot wash away this hatred
Even if I slash forty thousand of them with my bayonet
And send eighty thousand of them to the devil
And hang a hundred thousand of them
By Allah, this hatred won't leave me

A thousand heads of Giaours cannot wash away this hatred.

The text of HATRED was published by the large circulation Turkish
newspapaer Hurriyet on 18 July 1974, just 48 hours before the
Turkish invasion of Cyprus by order of the Bulent Ecevit
government.

Research: Leonidas Koumakis, Athens

This type of shits only written and followed by ultra nationalists and ignorants. r u one of them?

Darling ... you forget ... you have to be TURKISH to digest that one!

[insan]

Insan,

Now that you posted couple of totally useless articles on two individuals bitching about nothing regarding Perry Anderson or his article on "The Division of Cyprus", why don't you answer the question put to YFred since you are such a "good reader". Here is the question again.

R sure what i posted in quotes were "couple of totally useless articles on two individuals bitching about nothing regarding Perry Anderson or his article on "The Division of Cyprus""? reread with ur pair of glasses on, dear.

As a TC myself, I would recommend that you read this article by Perry Anderson (about 40 pages) and come back and tell us which parts of his reporting you disagree with, that despite what went on, that the Annan Plan should have been accepted regardless by all Cypriots.!

So tell us Mr/Ms critique, which parts of his reporting do you disagree with, that despite what went on, that the Annan Plan should have been accepted regardless by all Cypriots.!

What i mainly disagree is seen clearly what i quoted from "2 individuals" namely Reed Coughlan and David Hannay.

www.un.org/News/dh/hlpanel/hannay-bio.htm
http://www.esc.edu/ESConline/Across_ESC ... enDocument

It's a simple question and I'm not interested in your stupid game playing antics. Either answer the damn question or don't say anything at all, which is the best thing for you to do at times.!

Ok ma master, embryonic "ape" Kikapu. Not despite what went on, that the Annan Plan should have been accepted regardless by all Cypriots but Annan Plan should have been accepted regardless by all Cypriots in awareness of what's really happened in the past, what were the inevitable consequences, since Cyprus is in a US founded EU; keeping the pace with rapidly globalizing world and trying to reconcile with what's happened in the past. Hope it satisfies u ma master, embryonic "ape" Kikapu.

No my "naked slut" Insan, you did not answer my question as usual, that's because you did not read the article by Perry Anderson. Then again, how could you have read over 40 pages in 20 minutes. I did not ask for your useless opinion on the Anna Plan, which you gave us a useless answer anyway about the US and the EU and globalisation and consequences and more crap. The question was, and try and read it closely this time my "naked slut" Insan, "which parts of his reporting do you disagree with, that despite what went on, that the Annan Plan should have been accepted regardless by all Cypriots.!". Give me the PARTS and QUOTE them for us. Which PARTS of the report do you disagree with. Perhaps this was one of those times that it would have been best if you said nothing at all, because that's all you did anyway, which you said NOTHING at all.!

I sually don't read one-sided propaganda junks full of clear intentional misinterpretations sponsored by Tpap and Pangalos. Hope u got it ma master emryonic "ape" Kikapu. Who is ur sponsor btw?

[YFred]

Not forgetting ...

KIN (Hatred)

Kahpe Yunan bu dünyada durdukça
Bu kin benden vallâhi de gidemez
Durup durup köpek gibi gördükçe
Bu kin benden vallâhi de gidemez
Bin Gâvur kellesi bir kin ödemez

Ŏç almaktur yergâne tasam
Sira gėlse savaş meydanuna uğrasam
Bir günde bin Gâvur kellesi doğrasam
Bu kin benden vallâhi de gidemez
Bin Gâvur kellesi bir kin ödemez

Otuz bininin taşla ezsem başinı
On bininin pensle söksem dişini
Yüz bininin çaya döksem leşini
Bu kin benden vallâhi de gidemez
Bin Gâvur kellesi bir kin ödemez

Bütün dünya bilir Türk ’ün farkını
Yunan ’in başina yikan çarkınt
Künhanlarda yâksam beş bin kırkını
Bu kin benden vallâhi de gidemez
Bin Gâvur kellesi bir kin ödemez

Kırk binini süngü ile pullasam
Seksen binini cehenneme yollasam
Yüz binini ile çeklip sallasam
Bu kin benden vallâhi de gidemez
Bin Gâvur kellesi bir kin ödemez

The text of HATRED was published by the large
circulation Turkish newspapaer Hurriyet on 18 July
1974, just 48 hours before the Turkish invasion of
Cyprus by order of the Bulent Ecevit government.
Research: Leonidas Koumakis, Athens

Have I lost it, or did you complain that Turkish should not be posted on this forum. Practice what you preach dearest.
War mongers do what they do. I seem to remember as a five year old in 63, listening on the GC Radio to a speech from your beloved Makarios how he was going to push the TURKS in to the Thalassa. This is TC's we are talking about.
This will be the last post on this matter, I am not wasting my time. I need to read what Kikapu asked me to. Infact I intend to read the whole thing.

[Oracle]

I seem to remmeber as a five year old in 63, listening on the GC Radio to a speech from your beloved Makarios how he was going to push the TURKS in to the Thalassa.

Really ... you expect me to believe the "memory" of what might have been a "5 year old" ...

Please prove Makarios said such a thing ... or admit you are a total waste of time in responding to, because you are full of shit ....

[YFred]

I seem to remmeber as a five year old in 63, listening on the GC Radio to a speech from your beloved Makarios how he was going to push the TURKS in to the Thalassa.

Really ... you expect me to believe the "memory" of what might have been a "5 year old" ...

Please prove Makarios said such a thing ... or admit you are a total waste of time in responding to, because you are full of shit ....

My developmental stages were discussed in an earlier post. Unless the GC radio kept the recordings, I suspect we will have to wait and see who else remembers it. With a bit of luck, you may even find some 45 year olds that may have heard it, even within their mother. It was very loud.

[Oracle]

I seem to remmeber as a five year old in 63, listening on the GC Radio to a speech from your beloved Makarios how he was going to push the TURKS in to the Thalassa.

Really ... you expect me to believe the "memory" of what might have been a "5 year old" ...

Please prove Makarios said such a thing ... or admit you are a total waste of time in responding to, because you are full of shit ....

My developmental stages were discussed in an earlier post. Unless the GC radio kept the recordings, I suspect we will have to wait and see who else remembers it. With a bit of luck, you may even find some 45 year olds that may have heard it, even within their mother. It was very loud.

Nobody remembers it because it is another of your frequent lies...

Why don't you just stop embarrassing the few remaining TCs with integrity, and stop posting made-up rubbish that you sweep away with vagueness ....

[insan]

Or the translation for those who do not read the devil's language .....


HATRED

As long as the vulgar Greek exists in this world
By Allah, my hatred won't leave me
As long as I see him there like a dog
By Allah, this hatred won't leave me
A thousand heads of infidel Giaours cannot wash away this hatred.

My only aim is revenge
When my turn comes to go to battle
In one day I'll butcher a thousand Giaours
By Allah, this hatred won't leave me
A thousand heads of Giaours cannot wash away this hatred.

Even if I crush thirty thousand of their heads with a stone
Even if I wrench out the teeth of ten thousand
And throw a hundred thousand of their corpses into the river
By Allah, this hatred won't leave me

A thousand heads of Giaours cannot wash away this hatred.
The whole world knows how superior the Turk is
Who crashed the Greek's fucked world over his head
Even if I burn in stokeholes the heads of five thousand of them
By Allah, this hatred won't leave me

A thousand heads of Giaours cannot wash away this hatred
Even if I slash forty thousand of them with my bayonet
And send eighty thousand of them to the devil
And hang a hundred thousand of them
By Allah, this hatred won't leave me

A thousand heads of Giaours cannot wash away this hatred.

The text of HATRED was published by the large circulation Turkish
newspapaer Hurriyet on 18 July 1974, just 48 hours before the
Turkish invasion of Cyprus by order of the Bulent Ecevit
government.

Research: Leonidas Koumakis, Athens

This type of shits only written and followed by ultra nationalists and ignorants. r u one of them?

Darling ... you forget ... you have to be TURKISH to digest that one!

As far as i know im a Turkish descendant human being. what u mean by saying " u have to be Turkish."?

[Kikapu]

Insan,

Now that you posted couple of totally useless articles on two individuals bitching about nothing regarding Perry Anderson or his article on "The Division of Cyprus", why don't you answer the question put to YFred since you are such a "good reader". Here is the question again.

R sure what i posted in quotes were "couple of totally useless articles on two individuals bitching about nothing regarding Perry Anderson or his article on "The Division of Cyprus""? reread with ur pair of glasses on, dear.

As a TC myself, I would recommend that you read this article by Perry Anderson (about 40 pages) and come back and tell us which parts of his reporting you disagree with, that despite what went on, that the Annan Plan should have been accepted regardless by all Cypriots.!

So tell us Mr/Ms critique, which parts of his reporting do you disagree with, that despite what went on, that the Annan Plan should have been accepted regardless by all Cypriots.!

What i mainly disagree is seen clearly what i quoted from "2 individuals" namely Reed Coughlan and David Hannay.

www.un.org/News/dh/hlpanel/hannay-bio.htm
http://www.esc.edu/ESConline/Across_ESC ... enDocument

It's a simple question and I'm not interested in your stupid game playing antics. Either answer the damn question or don't say anything at all, which is the best thing for you to do at times.!

Ok ma master, embryonic "ape" Kikapu. Not despite what went on, that the Annan Plan should have been accepted regardless by all Cypriots but Annan Plan should have been accepted regardless by all Cypriots in awareness of what's really happened in the past, what were the inevitable consequences, since Cyprus is in a US founded EU; keeping the pace with rapidly globalizing world and trying to reconcile with what's happened in the past. Hope it satisfies u ma master, embryonic "ape" Kikapu.

No my "naked slut" Insan, you did not answer my question as usual, that's because you did not read the article by Perry Anderson. Then again, how could you have read over 40 pages in 20 minutes. I did not ask for your useless opinion on the Anna Plan, which you gave us a useless answer anyway about the US and the EU and globalisation and consequences and more crap. The question was, and try and read it closely this time my "naked slut" Insan, "which parts of his reporting do you disagree with, that despite what went on, that the Annan Plan should have been accepted regardless by all Cypriots.!". Give me the PARTS and QUOTE them for us. Which PARTS of the report do you disagree with. Perhaps this was one of those times that it would have been best if you said nothing at all, because that's all you did anyway, which you said NOTHING at all.!

I sually don't read one-sided propaganda junks full of clear intentional misinterpretations sponsored by Tpap and Pangalos. Hope u got it ma master emryonic "ape" Kikapu. Who is ur sponsor btw?

You are a narrow and ignorant minded "naked slut", aren't you, Insan.!

The Divisions of Cyprus
by Perry Anderson

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v30/n08/ande01_.html

A Cyprus issue perspective by a world widely very well known and respected British intellectual.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perry_Anderson

[insan]

Insan,

Now that you posted couple of totally useless articles on two individuals bitching about nothing regarding Perry Anderson or his article on "The Division of Cyprus", why don't you answer the question put to YFred since you are such a "good reader". Here is the question again.

R sure what i posted in quotes were "couple of totally useless articles on two individuals bitching about nothing regarding Perry Anderson or his article on "The Division of Cyprus""? reread with ur pair of glasses on, dear.

As a TC myself, I would recommend that you read this article by Perry Anderson (about 40 pages) and come back and tell us which parts of his reporting you disagree with, that despite what went on, that the Annan Plan should have been accepted regardless by all Cypriots.!

So tell us Mr/Ms critique, which parts of his reporting do you disagree with, that despite what went on, that the Annan Plan should have been accepted regardless by all Cypriots.!

What i mainly disagree is seen clearly what i quoted from "2 individuals" namely Reed Coughlan and David Hannay.

www.un.org/News/dh/hlpanel/hannay-bio.htm
http://www.esc.edu/ESConline/Across_ESC ... enDocument

It's a simple question and I'm not interested in your stupid game playing antics. Either answer the damn question or don't say anything at all, which is the best thing for you to do at times.!

Ok ma master, embryonic "ape" Kikapu. Not despite what went on, that the Annan Plan should have been accepted regardless by all Cypriots but Annan Plan should have been accepted regardless by all Cypriots in awareness of what's really happened in the past, what were the inevitable consequences, since Cyprus is in a US founded EU; keeping the pace with rapidly globalizing world and trying to reconcile with what's happened in the past. Hope it satisfies u ma master, embryonic "ape" Kikapu.

No my "naked slut" Insan, you did not answer my question as usual, that's because you did not read the article by Perry Anderson. Then again, how could you have read over 40 pages in 20 minutes. I did not ask for your useless opinion on the Anna Plan, which you gave us a useless answer anyway about the US and the EU and globalisation and consequences and more crap. The question was, and try and read it closely this time my "naked slut" Insan, "which parts of his reporting do you disagree with, that despite what went on, that the Annan Plan should have been accepted regardless by all Cypriots.!". Give me the PARTS and QUOTE them for us. Which PARTS of the report do you disagree with. Perhaps this was one of those times that it would have been best if you said nothing at all, because that's all you did anyway, which you said NOTHING at all.!

I sually don't read one-sided propaganda junks full of clear intentional misinterpretations sponsored by Tpap and Pangalos. Hope u got it ma master emryonic "ape" Kikapu. Who is ur sponsor btw?

You are a narrow and ignorant minded "naked slut", aren't you, Insan.!

The Divisions of Cyprus
by Perry Anderson

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v30/n08/ande01_.html

A Cyprus issue perspective by a world widely very well known and respected British intellectual.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perry_Anderson

So what? Hannay and Coughlan r not? At least they r not sponsored by TPap and Pangalos. Anderson's report is full of historical distortions as clearly mentioned by Hannay and Coughlan. However an embryonic "ape" like u needs to put his glasses of "unbiased" to see such distortions but ur sponsors don't let u i'm sure.