Cyprus-Forum.com

[Get Real!]

“The Nature of Man and the Origin of Government”

Always include your source link so that everyone can see that you’re posting junk notes on some crap ideas from 1848!

http://www.uoregon.edu/~jboland/calhoun.html

I don’t appreciate you wasting our time with junk because democracy has come a long way since then.

[insan]

“The Nature of Man and the Origin of Government”

Always include your source link so that everyone can see that you’re posting junk notes on some crap ideas from 1848!

http://www.uoregon.edu/~jboland/calhoun.html

I don’t appreciate you wasting our time with junk because democracy has come a long way since then.

As i told u before, u r not capable to evaluate Cyprus problem in it's very unique own parameters. Your crap, embryonic ape mentality will never let u get such a mentality. Keep repeating ur nonsense, nonpragmatic; junk "ideas", like TPap.

Traditional national feeling in a civil society does not need reinforcement by nationalidentity policies. Only the construction of sub-nations in multinational states have to rely onidentity politics. The sub-nations in devolutionary federalist states have to fight the prejudicethat “symmetrical federalism” or equal treatment of all the regions is “rational,” whereasspecial protection of sub-nations is “irrational”. In Spain the privileges of the three “sub-nations” (Basque Country, Catalonia and Galicia) meet with counter-slogans such as “cafépara todos”. When the other regions get additional rights, the sub-nations make further claimsand consequently are a blamed for getting “coffee plus brandy”. A problem of moderndemocratic federalism is that symmetrical schemes of early “coming-together-federalisms” donot work in a social situation of centrifugal tendencies, limited by “keeping-together-federalism.” At least in the European Union John C. Calhoun’s (1853, 1953: 23) idea of“concurrent or constitutional majorities” - close to a liberum veto - is no longer viable as amodel of a loose confederation of “sovereign” states. But Calhoun’s basic idea for a “properorganism”, to “regard interests as well as numbers” had a kind of revival. In a more integrated way the sub-nations in post-modern federalism ask for “concurrent majorities” on the level ofregional autonomy. Federalism again became a normative concept.

http://www.afsp.msh-paris.fr/activite/2 ... beyme2.pdf

[DT.]

“The Nature of Man and the Origin of Government”

Always include your source link so that everyone can see that you’re posting junk notes on some crap ideas from 1848!

http://www.uoregon.edu/~jboland/calhoun.html

I don’t appreciate you wasting our time with junk because democracy has come a long way since then.

As i told u before, u r not capable to evaluate Cyprus problem in it's very unique own parameters. Your crap, embryonic ape mentality will never let u get such a mentality. Keep repeating ur nonsense, nonpragmatic; junk "ideas", like TPap.

Traditional national feeling in a civil society does not need reinforcement by nationalidentity policies. Only the construction of sub-nations in multinational states have to rely onidentity politics. The sub-nations in devolutionary federalist states have to fight the prejudicethat “symmetrical federalism” or equal treatment of all the regions is “rational,” whereasspecial protection of sub-nations is “irrational”. In Spain the privileges of the three “sub-nations” (Basque Country, Catalonia and Galicia) meet with counter-slogans such as “cafépara todos”. When the other regions get additional rights, the sub-nations make further claimsand consequently are a blamed for getting “coffee plus brandy”. A problem of moderndemocratic federalism is that symmetrical schemes of early “coming-together-federalisms” donot work in a social situation of centrifugal tendencies, limited by “keeping-together-federalism.” At least in the European Union John C. Calhoun’s (1853, 1953: 23) idea of“concurrent or constitutional majorities” - close to a liberum veto - is no longer viable as amodel of a loose confederation of “sovereign” states. But Calhoun’s basic idea for a “properorganism”, to “regard interests as well as numbers” had a kind of revival. In a more integrated way the sub-nations in post-modern federalism ask for “concurrent majorities” on the level ofregional autonomy. Federalism again became a normative concept.

http://www.afsp.msh-paris.fr/activite/2 ... beyme2.pdf

What the hell is an embryonic ape anyway?

[Get Real!]

As i told u before, u r not capable to evaluate Cyprus problem in it's very unique own parameters. Your crap, embryonic ape mentality will never let u get such a mentality. Keep repeating ur nonsense, nonpragmatic; junk "ideas", like TPap.

Just switch of your computer, put it in its box, and take it back were you bought it from because you’re too stupid to own one.

[Paphitis]

“The Nature of Man and the Origin of Government”

Always include your source link so that everyone can see that you’re posting junk notes on some crap ideas from 1848!

http://www.uoregon.edu/~jboland/calhoun.html

I don’t appreciate you wasting our time with junk because democracy has come a long way since then.

As i told u before, u r not capable to evaluate Cyprus problem in it's very unique own parameters. Your crap, embryonic ape mentality will never let u get such a mentality. Keep repeating ur nonsense, nonpragmatic; junk "ideas", like TPap.

Traditional national feeling in a civil society does not need reinforcement by nationalidentity policies. Only the construction of sub-nations in multinational states have to rely onidentity politics. The sub-nations in devolutionary federalist states have to fight the prejudicethat “symmetrical federalism” or equal treatment of all the regions is “rational,” whereasspecial protection of sub-nations is “irrational”. In Spain the privileges of the three “sub-nations” (Basque Country, Catalonia and Galicia) meet with counter-slogans such as “cafépara todos”. When the other regions get additional rights, the sub-nations make further claimsand consequently are a blamed for getting “coffee plus brandy”. A problem of moderndemocratic federalism is that symmetrical schemes of early “coming-together-federalisms” donot work in a social situation of centrifugal tendencies, limited by “keeping-together-federalism.” At least in the European Union John C. Calhoun’s (1853, 1953: 23) idea of“concurrent or constitutional majorities” - close to a liberum veto - is no longer viable as amodel of a loose confederation of “sovereign” states. But Calhoun’s basic idea for a “properorganism”, to “regard interests as well as numbers” had a kind of revival. In a more integrated way the sub-nations in post-modern federalism ask for “concurrent majorities” on the level ofregional autonomy. Federalism again became a normative concept.

http://www.afsp.msh-paris.fr/activite/2 ... beyme2.pdf

How old is this source? Are you in the 20th century yet?

[Oracle]

As i told u before, u r not capable to evaluate Cyprus problem in it's very unique own parameters. Your crap, embryonic ape mentality will never let u get such a mentality. Keep repeating ur nonsense, nonpragmatic; junk "ideas", like TPap.

Just switch of your computer, put it in its box, and take it back were you bought it from because you’re too stupid to own one.

But he owns an Internet Cafe .....

[insan]

“The Nature of Man and the Origin of Government”

Always include your source link so that everyone can see that you’re posting junk notes on some crap ideas from 1848!

http://www.uoregon.edu/~jboland/calhoun.html

I don’t appreciate you wasting our time with junk because democracy has come a long way since then.

As i told u before, u r not capable to evaluate Cyprus problem in it's very unique own parameters. Your crap, embryonic ape mentality will never let u get such a mentality. Keep repeating ur nonsense, nonpragmatic; junk "ideas", like TPap.

Traditional national feeling in a civil society does not need reinforcement by nationalidentity policies. Only the construction of sub-nations in multinational states have to rely onidentity politics. The sub-nations in devolutionary federalist states have to fight the prejudicethat “symmetrical federalism” or equal treatment of all the regions is “rational,” whereasspecial protection of sub-nations is “irrational”. In Spain the privileges of the three “sub-nations” (Basque Country, Catalonia and Galicia) meet with counter-slogans such as “cafépara todos”. When the other regions get additional rights, the sub-nations make further claimsand consequently are a blamed for getting “coffee plus brandy”. A problem of moderndemocratic federalism is that symmetrical schemes of early “coming-together-federalisms” donot work in a social situation of centrifugal tendencies, limited by “keeping-together-federalism.” At least in the European Union John C. Calhoun’s (1853, 1953: 23) idea of“concurrent or constitutional majorities” - close to a liberum veto - is no longer viable as amodel of a loose confederation of “sovereign” states. But Calhoun’s basic idea for a “properorganism”, to “regard interests as well as numbers” had a kind of revival. In a more integrated way the sub-nations in post-modern federalism ask for “concurrent majorities” on the level ofregional autonomy. Federalism again became a normative concept.

http://www.afsp.msh-paris.fr/activite/2 ... beyme2.pdf

How old is this source. Are you in the 20th century yet?

Be sure, it's younger than ur rotten embryonic brain.

[Oracle]

“The Nature of Man and the Origin of Government”

Always include your source link so that everyone can see that you’re posting junk notes on some crap ideas from 1848!

http://www.uoregon.edu/~jboland/calhoun.html

I don’t appreciate you wasting our time with junk because democracy has come a long way since then.

As i told u before, u r not capable to evaluate Cyprus problem in it's very unique own parameters. Your crap, embryonic ape mentality will never let u get such a mentality. Keep repeating ur nonsense, nonpragmatic; junk "ideas", like TPap.

Traditional national feeling in a civil society does not need reinforcement by nationalidentity policies. Only the construction of sub-nations in multinational states have to rely onidentity politics. The sub-nations in devolutionary federalist states have to fight the prejudicethat “symmetrical federalism” or equal treatment of all the regions is “rational,” whereasspecial protection of sub-nations is “irrational”. In Spain the privileges of the three “sub-nations” (Basque Country, Catalonia and Galicia) meet with counter-slogans such as “cafépara todos”. When the other regions get additional rights, the sub-nations make further claimsand consequently are a blamed for getting “coffee plus brandy”. A problem of moderndemocratic federalism is that symmetrical schemes of early “coming-together-federalisms” donot work in a social situation of centrifugal tendencies, limited by “keeping-together-federalism.” At least in the European Union John C. Calhoun’s (1853, 1953: 23) idea of“concurrent or constitutional majorities” - close to a liberum veto - is no longer viable as amodel of a loose confederation of “sovereign” states. But Calhoun’s basic idea for a “properorganism”, to “regard interests as well as numbers” had a kind of revival. In a more integrated way the sub-nations in post-modern federalism ask for “concurrent majorities” on the level ofregional autonomy. Federalism again became a normative concept.

http://www.afsp.msh-paris.fr/activite/2 ... beyme2.pdf

How old is this source. Are you in the 20th century yet?

Be sure, it's younger than ur rotten embryonic brain.

Insan you have embryos on the brain ... have you started on those twelve babies you want to have yet?

[Get Real!]

As i told u before, u r not capable to evaluate Cyprus problem in it's very unique own parameters. Your crap, embryonic ape mentality will never let u get such a mentality. Keep repeating ur nonsense, nonpragmatic; junk "ideas", like TPap.

Just switch of your computer, put it in its box, and take it back were you bought it from because you’re too stupid to own one.

But he owns an Internet Cafe .....

In that case he should make an announcement...

"Phoo... phoo... 1-2 1-2-3... "

"Everyone, can I please have your attention... can everyone please shut their computer down and make your way to the exit. I’ve just been informed that I’m too stupid to own a computer so it becomes a federal offence for me to rent them out to others!"

Problem solved.

[insan]

“The Nature of Man and the Origin of Government”

Always include your source link so that everyone can see that you’re posting junk notes on some crap ideas from 1848!

http://www.uoregon.edu/~jboland/calhoun.html

I don’t appreciate you wasting our time with junk because democracy has come a long way since then.

As i told u before, u r not capable to evaluate Cyprus problem in it's very unique own parameters. Your crap, embryonic ape mentality will never let u get such a mentality. Keep repeating ur nonsense, nonpragmatic; junk "ideas", like TPap.

Traditional national feeling in a civil society does not need reinforcement by nationalidentity policies. Only the construction of sub-nations in multinational states have to rely onidentity politics. The sub-nations in devolutionary federalist states have to fight the prejudicethat “symmetrical federalism” or equal treatment of all the regions is “rational,” whereasspecial protection of sub-nations is “irrational”. In Spain the privileges of the three “sub-nations” (Basque Country, Catalonia and Galicia) meet with counter-slogans such as “cafépara todos”. When the other regions get additional rights, the sub-nations make further claimsand consequently are a blamed for getting “coffee plus brandy”. A problem of moderndemocratic federalism is that symmetrical schemes of early “coming-together-federalisms” donot work in a social situation of centrifugal tendencies, limited by “keeping-together-federalism.” At least in the European Union John C. Calhoun’s (1853, 1953: 23) idea of“concurrent or constitutional majorities” - close to a liberum veto - is no longer viable as amodel of a loose confederation of “sovereign” states. But Calhoun’s basic idea for a “properorganism”, to “regard interests as well as numbers” had a kind of revival. In a more integrated way the sub-nations in post-modern federalism ask for “concurrent majorities” on the level ofregional autonomy. Federalism again became a normative concept.

http://www.afsp.msh-paris.fr/activite/2 ... beyme2.pdf

How old is this source. Are you in the 20th century yet?

Be sure, it's younger than ur rotten embryonic brain.

Insan you have embryos on the brain ... have you started on those twelve babies you want to have yet?

No dear, when we get married; i will start. R u below 40?