It is interesting to note that advocates of the system of Proportional
Representation have quoted with approval the Cyprus Constitution. Thus
the late Earl Grey in an article in the Nineteenth Century, wrote as follows :
" At the end of 1882 it was decided to give Cyprus representative institutions.
A legislative council was created in which there were twelve members to be
elected by the people. But the census taken in 1881 revealed the fact that
one-quarter of the people were Mahomedan and three-quarters non-Mahome-
dan. Now, wishing to secure fair representation, what did the Government
do ? Did they divide the island into twelve districts each returning one
member ? No ; they knew that such a course would be grossly unfair to the
Mahomedans, w^ho, although they were one-quarter of the whole, would be,
of course, out-voted in every constituency, and practically disfranchized.
So the Government decided that three of the members should be elected by
the Mahomedan and nine by the non-Mahomedan inhabitants. . . . Now
it is difficult to understand why, if it is desirable to secure the general repre-
sentation of the people of Cyprus, it should not be equally desirable to obtain
the general representation of the people of the United Kingdom." It should
be gratifying to the Cypriot to And his Constitution cited by a prominent
Englishman as a model which the United Kingdom would do well to follow I
98 CYPRUS UNDER BRITISH RULE
We are able to substantiate by many proofs that during the
long period in which we had the opportunity we have constantly
endeavoured to support goodwill and justice, holding all
classes on an equal footing in our proceedings without distinc-
tion of creed or faith, and to shield and protect the sufferers
from wrong. While at the time of the change of the adminis-
tration of the island we knew we were losing a Government
of our own faith we willingly submitted to Her Britannic
Majesty's rule, and took refuge under the equitableness and
graciousness of Her Government, so well known to the whole
world, without paying any attention and without attaching
the least importance to the constant incitement and instiga-
tions of our Christian compatriots. We have never raised
complaints against the Government under any pretext what-
ever, but have always been the first to accept and comply with
all the orders and inhibitions, whether of a heavy or light
nature, made by the Government, and have zealously applied
ourselves to the speedy observance and carrying out of the
same ; and this we believe is a fact well known to the central
authorities. Nevertheless, whilst we expected to be publicly
rewarded for our zealous services in the past, and especially
in consideration of our official rights above referred to, it is
proposed that the Greek community whose thoughts and inten-
tions of oppressing and vexing us are made manifest under all
circumstances, and in every one of their acts, who have con-
stantly made all sorts of complaints (against the Government),
and whose endless cries of ' We want the Hellenic Govern-
ment for our rulers,' are still echoing from the heights of heaven,
should all at once be granted a privilege which they have never
possessed in the past, and which they can claim on no ground
of present grievance. Our Christian compatriots would have
hardly expected to acquire the proposed privilege even after
the lapse of a thousand years had, God forbid, the island been
ceded to the Hellenic Government. Such being the case, can
this indulgence be considered justifiable or approved by the
world ?
http://www.archive.org/stream/cyprusund ... c_djvu.txt